Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults

Cora Peterson, Megan C. Kearns, Wendy Li Kam Wa McIntosh, Lianne Fuino Estefan, Christina Nicolaidis, Kathryn McCollister, Amy Gordon, Curtis Florence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study estimated the U.S. lifetime per-victim cost and economic burden of intimate partner violence.

METHODS: Data from previous studies were combined with 2012 U.S. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey data in a mathematical model. Intimate partner violence was defined as contact sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking victimization with related impact (e.g., missed work days). Costs included attributable impaired health, lost productivity, and criminal justice costs from the societal perspective. Mean age at first victimization was assessed as 25 years. Future costs were discounted by 3%. The main outcome measures were the mean per-victim (female and male) and total population (or economic burden) lifetime cost of intimate partner violence. Secondary outcome measures were marginal outcome probabilities among victims (e.g., anxiety disorder) and associated costs. Analysis was conducted in 2017.

RESULTS: The estimated intimate partner violence lifetime cost was $103,767 per female victim and $23,414 per male victim, or a population economic burden of nearly $3.6 trillion (2014 US$) over victims' lifetimes, based on 43 million U.S. adults with victimization history. This estimate included $2.1 trillion (59% of total) in medical costs, $1.3 trillion (37%) in lost productivity among victims and perpetrators, $73 billion (2%) in criminal justice activities, and $62 billion (2%) in other costs, including victim property loss or damage. Government sources pay an estimated $1.3 trillion (37%) of the lifetime economic burden.

CONCLUSIONS: Preventing intimate partner violence is possible and could avoid substantial costs. These findings can inform the potential benefit of prioritizing prevention, as well as evaluation of implemented prevention strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)433-444
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Economics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Crime Victims
Criminal Law
Sex Offenses
Stalking
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Intimate Partner Violence
Anxiety Disorders
Population
Theoretical Models
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Peterson, C., Kearns, M. C., McIntosh, W. L. K. W., Estefan, L. F., Nicolaidis, C., McCollister, K., ... Florence, C. (2018). Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(4), 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049

Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults. / Peterson, Cora; Kearns, Megan C.; McIntosh, Wendy Li Kam Wa; Estefan, Lianne Fuino; Nicolaidis, Christina; McCollister, Kathryn; Gordon, Amy; Florence, Curtis.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 55, No. 4, 01.10.2018, p. 433-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peterson, C, Kearns, MC, McIntosh, WLKW, Estefan, LF, Nicolaidis, C, McCollister, K, Gordon, A & Florence, C 2018, 'Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults', American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049
Peterson, Cora ; Kearns, Megan C. ; McIntosh, Wendy Li Kam Wa ; Estefan, Lianne Fuino ; Nicolaidis, Christina ; McCollister, Kathryn ; Gordon, Amy ; Florence, Curtis. / Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 433-444.
@article{54aa28f9392449f1831e7113dfe4bf98,
title = "Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: This study estimated the U.S. lifetime per-victim cost and economic burden of intimate partner violence.METHODS: Data from previous studies were combined with 2012 U.S. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey data in a mathematical model. Intimate partner violence was defined as contact sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking victimization with related impact (e.g., missed work days). Costs included attributable impaired health, lost productivity, and criminal justice costs from the societal perspective. Mean age at first victimization was assessed as 25 years. Future costs were discounted by 3{\%}. The main outcome measures were the mean per-victim (female and male) and total population (or economic burden) lifetime cost of intimate partner violence. Secondary outcome measures were marginal outcome probabilities among victims (e.g., anxiety disorder) and associated costs. Analysis was conducted in 2017.RESULTS: The estimated intimate partner violence lifetime cost was $103,767 per female victim and $23,414 per male victim, or a population economic burden of nearly $3.6 trillion (2014 US$) over victims' lifetimes, based on 43 million U.S. adults with victimization history. This estimate included $2.1 trillion (59{\%} of total) in medical costs, $1.3 trillion (37{\%}) in lost productivity among victims and perpetrators, $73 billion (2{\%}) in criminal justice activities, and $62 billion (2{\%}) in other costs, including victim property loss or damage. Government sources pay an estimated $1.3 trillion (37{\%}) of the lifetime economic burden.CONCLUSIONS: Preventing intimate partner violence is possible and could avoid substantial costs. These findings can inform the potential benefit of prioritizing prevention, as well as evaluation of implemented prevention strategies.",
author = "Cora Peterson and Kearns, {Megan C.} and McIntosh, {Wendy Li Kam Wa} and Estefan, {Lianne Fuino} and Christina Nicolaidis and Kathryn McCollister and Amy Gordon and Curtis Florence",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "433--444",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults

AU - Peterson, Cora

AU - Kearns, Megan C.

AU - McIntosh, Wendy Li Kam Wa

AU - Estefan, Lianne Fuino

AU - Nicolaidis, Christina

AU - McCollister, Kathryn

AU - Gordon, Amy

AU - Florence, Curtis

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - INTRODUCTION: This study estimated the U.S. lifetime per-victim cost and economic burden of intimate partner violence.METHODS: Data from previous studies were combined with 2012 U.S. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey data in a mathematical model. Intimate partner violence was defined as contact sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking victimization with related impact (e.g., missed work days). Costs included attributable impaired health, lost productivity, and criminal justice costs from the societal perspective. Mean age at first victimization was assessed as 25 years. Future costs were discounted by 3%. The main outcome measures were the mean per-victim (female and male) and total population (or economic burden) lifetime cost of intimate partner violence. Secondary outcome measures were marginal outcome probabilities among victims (e.g., anxiety disorder) and associated costs. Analysis was conducted in 2017.RESULTS: The estimated intimate partner violence lifetime cost was $103,767 per female victim and $23,414 per male victim, or a population economic burden of nearly $3.6 trillion (2014 US$) over victims' lifetimes, based on 43 million U.S. adults with victimization history. This estimate included $2.1 trillion (59% of total) in medical costs, $1.3 trillion (37%) in lost productivity among victims and perpetrators, $73 billion (2%) in criminal justice activities, and $62 billion (2%) in other costs, including victim property loss or damage. Government sources pay an estimated $1.3 trillion (37%) of the lifetime economic burden.CONCLUSIONS: Preventing intimate partner violence is possible and could avoid substantial costs. These findings can inform the potential benefit of prioritizing prevention, as well as evaluation of implemented prevention strategies.

AB - INTRODUCTION: This study estimated the U.S. lifetime per-victim cost and economic burden of intimate partner violence.METHODS: Data from previous studies were combined with 2012 U.S. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey data in a mathematical model. Intimate partner violence was defined as contact sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking victimization with related impact (e.g., missed work days). Costs included attributable impaired health, lost productivity, and criminal justice costs from the societal perspective. Mean age at first victimization was assessed as 25 years. Future costs were discounted by 3%. The main outcome measures were the mean per-victim (female and male) and total population (or economic burden) lifetime cost of intimate partner violence. Secondary outcome measures were marginal outcome probabilities among victims (e.g., anxiety disorder) and associated costs. Analysis was conducted in 2017.RESULTS: The estimated intimate partner violence lifetime cost was $103,767 per female victim and $23,414 per male victim, or a population economic burden of nearly $3.6 trillion (2014 US$) over victims' lifetimes, based on 43 million U.S. adults with victimization history. This estimate included $2.1 trillion (59% of total) in medical costs, $1.3 trillion (37%) in lost productivity among victims and perpetrators, $73 billion (2%) in criminal justice activities, and $62 billion (2%) in other costs, including victim property loss or damage. Government sources pay an estimated $1.3 trillion (37%) of the lifetime economic burden.CONCLUSIONS: Preventing intimate partner violence is possible and could avoid substantial costs. These findings can inform the potential benefit of prioritizing prevention, as well as evaluation of implemented prevention strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053897073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053897073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 433

EP - 444

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 4

ER -