Life in configuration space

Peter Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper investigates the tenability of wavefunction realism, according to which the quantum mechanical wavefunction is not just a convenient predictive tool, but is a real entity figuring in physical explanations of our measurement results. An apparent difficulty with this position is that the wavefunction exists in a many-dimensional configuration space, whereas the world appears to us to be three-dimensional. 1 consider the arguments that have been given for and against the tenability of wavefunction realism, and note that both the proponents and the opponents assume that quantum mechanical configuration space is many-dimensional in exactly the same sense in which classical space is three-dimensional. I argue that this assumption is mistaken, and that configuration space can be taken as three-dimensional in a relevant sense. I conclude that wavefunction realism is far less problematic than it has been taken to be.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)713-729
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume55
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Realism
Three-dimensional
Physical
Opponents
Entity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Life in configuration space. / Lewis, Peter.

In: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2004, p. 713-729.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewis, Peter. / Life in configuration space. In: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2004 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 713-729.
@article{e643e16553e94f6287dcc710596bf50c,
title = "Life in configuration space",
abstract = "This paper investigates the tenability of wavefunction realism, according to which the quantum mechanical wavefunction is not just a convenient predictive tool, but is a real entity figuring in physical explanations of our measurement results. An apparent difficulty with this position is that the wavefunction exists in a many-dimensional configuration space, whereas the world appears to us to be three-dimensional. 1 consider the arguments that have been given for and against the tenability of wavefunction realism, and note that both the proponents and the opponents assume that quantum mechanical configuration space is many-dimensional in exactly the same sense in which classical space is three-dimensional. I argue that this assumption is mistaken, and that configuration space can be taken as three-dimensional in a relevant sense. I conclude that wavefunction realism is far less problematic than it has been taken to be.",
author = "Peter Lewis",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1093/bjps/55.4.713",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "713--729",
journal = "British Journal for the Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0007-0882",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Life in configuration space

AU - Lewis, Peter

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This paper investigates the tenability of wavefunction realism, according to which the quantum mechanical wavefunction is not just a convenient predictive tool, but is a real entity figuring in physical explanations of our measurement results. An apparent difficulty with this position is that the wavefunction exists in a many-dimensional configuration space, whereas the world appears to us to be three-dimensional. 1 consider the arguments that have been given for and against the tenability of wavefunction realism, and note that both the proponents and the opponents assume that quantum mechanical configuration space is many-dimensional in exactly the same sense in which classical space is three-dimensional. I argue that this assumption is mistaken, and that configuration space can be taken as three-dimensional in a relevant sense. I conclude that wavefunction realism is far less problematic than it has been taken to be.

AB - This paper investigates the tenability of wavefunction realism, according to which the quantum mechanical wavefunction is not just a convenient predictive tool, but is a real entity figuring in physical explanations of our measurement results. An apparent difficulty with this position is that the wavefunction exists in a many-dimensional configuration space, whereas the world appears to us to be three-dimensional. 1 consider the arguments that have been given for and against the tenability of wavefunction realism, and note that both the proponents and the opponents assume that quantum mechanical configuration space is many-dimensional in exactly the same sense in which classical space is three-dimensional. I argue that this assumption is mistaken, and that configuration space can be taken as three-dimensional in a relevant sense. I conclude that wavefunction realism is far less problematic than it has been taken to be.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14844325865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14844325865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bjps/55.4.713

DO - 10.1093/bjps/55.4.713

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:14844325865

VL - 55

SP - 713

EP - 729

JO - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

JF - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

SN - 0007-0882

IS - 4

ER -