Life-cycle cost and life-cycle assessment analysis at the design stage of a fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete bridge in Florida

Thomas Cadenazzi, Giovanni Dotelli, Marco Rossini, Steven Nolan, Antonio Nanni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To support and promote the deployment of innovative technologies in infrastructure, it is fundamental to quantify their implications in terms of both economic and environmental impacts. Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) strands are validated corrosion-resistant solutions for Reinforced Concrete (RC) and Prestressed Concrete (PC) structures. Studies on the performance of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) reinforcement in seawater and salt-contaminated concrete have been conducted and show that the technology is a viable solution. Nevertheless, the economic and environmental implications of FRP-RC/PC deployment have not been fully investigated. This article deals with the Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) and Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) analyses of an FRP-RC/PC bridge in Florida. The bridge is designed to be entirely reinforced with FRP bars and strands and does not include any Carbon Steel (CS) reinforcement. Furthermore, the deployment of seawater concrete in some of the elements of the bridge is considered. LCC and LCA analyses are performed at the design stage. Data regarding equipment, labor rates, consumables, fuel consumption, and disposal were collected during the construction phase, and the analysis was refined accordingly. The FRP-RC/PC bridge design is compared with a traditional CS-RC/PC alternative. Salient differences are discussed to determine the least-impactful solution from both an economic and environmental perspective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberACEM20180113
JournalAdvances in Civil Engineering Materials
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 13 2019

Fingerprint

Concrete bridges
Reinforced concrete
Life cycle
Polymers
Prestressed concrete
Fibers
Costs
Seawater
Economics
Carbon steel
Reinforcement
Concretes
Concrete construction
Fuel consumption
Glass fibers
Carbon fibers
Environmental impact
Salts
Personnel
Corrosion

Keywords

  • Bridges
  • Fiber-reinforced polymer
  • Life-cycle assessment
  • Life-cycle cost
  • Prestressed concrete
  • Reinforced concrete
  • Sustainable constructions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Metals and Alloys
  • Materials Chemistry

Cite this

Life-cycle cost and life-cycle assessment analysis at the design stage of a fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete bridge in Florida. / Cadenazzi, Thomas; Dotelli, Giovanni; Rossini, Marco; Nolan, Steven; Nanni, Antonio.

In: Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, Vol. 8, No. 2, ACEM20180113, 13.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7db1150f13e046bdb87442acb2d022f5,
title = "Life-cycle cost and life-cycle assessment analysis at the design stage of a fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete bridge in Florida",
abstract = "To support and promote the deployment of innovative technologies in infrastructure, it is fundamental to quantify their implications in terms of both economic and environmental impacts. Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) strands are validated corrosion-resistant solutions for Reinforced Concrete (RC) and Prestressed Concrete (PC) structures. Studies on the performance of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) reinforcement in seawater and salt-contaminated concrete have been conducted and show that the technology is a viable solution. Nevertheless, the economic and environmental implications of FRP-RC/PC deployment have not been fully investigated. This article deals with the Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) and Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) analyses of an FRP-RC/PC bridge in Florida. The bridge is designed to be entirely reinforced with FRP bars and strands and does not include any Carbon Steel (CS) reinforcement. Furthermore, the deployment of seawater concrete in some of the elements of the bridge is considered. LCC and LCA analyses are performed at the design stage. Data regarding equipment, labor rates, consumables, fuel consumption, and disposal were collected during the construction phase, and the analysis was refined accordingly. The FRP-RC/PC bridge design is compared with a traditional CS-RC/PC alternative. Salient differences are discussed to determine the least-impactful solution from both an economic and environmental perspective.",
keywords = "Bridges, Fiber-reinforced polymer, Life-cycle assessment, Life-cycle cost, Prestressed concrete, Reinforced concrete, Sustainable constructions",
author = "Thomas Cadenazzi and Giovanni Dotelli and Marco Rossini and Steven Nolan and Antonio Nanni",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1520/ACEM20180113",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Advances in Civil Engineering Materials",
issn = "2379-1357",
publisher = "ASTM International",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Life-cycle cost and life-cycle assessment analysis at the design stage of a fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete bridge in Florida

AU - Cadenazzi, Thomas

AU - Dotelli, Giovanni

AU - Rossini, Marco

AU - Nolan, Steven

AU - Nanni, Antonio

PY - 2019/3/13

Y1 - 2019/3/13

N2 - To support and promote the deployment of innovative technologies in infrastructure, it is fundamental to quantify their implications in terms of both economic and environmental impacts. Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) strands are validated corrosion-resistant solutions for Reinforced Concrete (RC) and Prestressed Concrete (PC) structures. Studies on the performance of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) reinforcement in seawater and salt-contaminated concrete have been conducted and show that the technology is a viable solution. Nevertheless, the economic and environmental implications of FRP-RC/PC deployment have not been fully investigated. This article deals with the Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) and Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) analyses of an FRP-RC/PC bridge in Florida. The bridge is designed to be entirely reinforced with FRP bars and strands and does not include any Carbon Steel (CS) reinforcement. Furthermore, the deployment of seawater concrete in some of the elements of the bridge is considered. LCC and LCA analyses are performed at the design stage. Data regarding equipment, labor rates, consumables, fuel consumption, and disposal were collected during the construction phase, and the analysis was refined accordingly. The FRP-RC/PC bridge design is compared with a traditional CS-RC/PC alternative. Salient differences are discussed to determine the least-impactful solution from both an economic and environmental perspective.

AB - To support and promote the deployment of innovative technologies in infrastructure, it is fundamental to quantify their implications in terms of both economic and environmental impacts. Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) strands are validated corrosion-resistant solutions for Reinforced Concrete (RC) and Prestressed Concrete (PC) structures. Studies on the performance of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) reinforcement in seawater and salt-contaminated concrete have been conducted and show that the technology is a viable solution. Nevertheless, the economic and environmental implications of FRP-RC/PC deployment have not been fully investigated. This article deals with the Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) and Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) analyses of an FRP-RC/PC bridge in Florida. The bridge is designed to be entirely reinforced with FRP bars and strands and does not include any Carbon Steel (CS) reinforcement. Furthermore, the deployment of seawater concrete in some of the elements of the bridge is considered. LCC and LCA analyses are performed at the design stage. Data regarding equipment, labor rates, consumables, fuel consumption, and disposal were collected during the construction phase, and the analysis was refined accordingly. The FRP-RC/PC bridge design is compared with a traditional CS-RC/PC alternative. Salient differences are discussed to determine the least-impactful solution from both an economic and environmental perspective.

KW - Bridges

KW - Fiber-reinforced polymer

KW - Life-cycle assessment

KW - Life-cycle cost

KW - Prestressed concrete

KW - Reinforced concrete

KW - Sustainable constructions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061302513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061302513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1520/ACEM20180113

DO - 10.1520/ACEM20180113

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061302513

VL - 8

JO - Advances in Civil Engineering Materials

JF - Advances in Civil Engineering Materials

SN - 2379-1357

IS - 2

M1 - ACEM20180113

ER -