Abstract
The architectural engineer has a considerable influence on the sustainability of buildings. The reduction in environmental impacts of building materials, as measured by life-cycle assessment (LCA), has recently become a focus in construction sustainability initiatives. The LCA comparisons of material alternatives in building structures, like concrete and steel, have not captured the material efficiency that the comparisons of structural system alternatives can provide. This paper compares the LCAs of two long-span structural systems, a truss system and a cable system, for the same application. Lower environmental outcomes are shown for the cable system when comparing the two systems' LCAs. Results showed a 29% reduction in structural system mass, a 65.1% reduction in embodied energy, and a 67.2% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions when comparing the cable to the truss system.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 05014005 |
| Journal | Journal of Architectural Engineering |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2015 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Case study
- Efficiency
- Environmental issues
- Life cycles
- Structural design
- Structural systems
- Sustainable buildings
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Building and Construction
- Architecture
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts
Cite this
Life-cycle assessment comparison for long-span cable and truss structural systems : Case study. / Trussoni, Matthew; Simatic, Evan; Raebel, Christopher H.; Huttelmaier, H. Peter.
In: Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 1, 05014005, 01.03.2015.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Life-cycle assessment comparison for long-span cable and truss structural systems
T2 - Case study
AU - Trussoni, Matthew
AU - Simatic, Evan
AU - Raebel, Christopher H.
AU - Huttelmaier, H. Peter
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - The architectural engineer has a considerable influence on the sustainability of buildings. The reduction in environmental impacts of building materials, as measured by life-cycle assessment (LCA), has recently become a focus in construction sustainability initiatives. The LCA comparisons of material alternatives in building structures, like concrete and steel, have not captured the material efficiency that the comparisons of structural system alternatives can provide. This paper compares the LCAs of two long-span structural systems, a truss system and a cable system, for the same application. Lower environmental outcomes are shown for the cable system when comparing the two systems' LCAs. Results showed a 29% reduction in structural system mass, a 65.1% reduction in embodied energy, and a 67.2% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions when comparing the cable to the truss system.
AB - The architectural engineer has a considerable influence on the sustainability of buildings. The reduction in environmental impacts of building materials, as measured by life-cycle assessment (LCA), has recently become a focus in construction sustainability initiatives. The LCA comparisons of material alternatives in building structures, like concrete and steel, have not captured the material efficiency that the comparisons of structural system alternatives can provide. This paper compares the LCAs of two long-span structural systems, a truss system and a cable system, for the same application. Lower environmental outcomes are shown for the cable system when comparing the two systems' LCAs. Results showed a 29% reduction in structural system mass, a 65.1% reduction in embodied energy, and a 67.2% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions when comparing the cable to the truss system.
KW - Case study
KW - Efficiency
KW - Environmental issues
KW - Life cycles
KW - Structural design
KW - Structural systems
KW - Sustainable buildings
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923170138&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923170138&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000154
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000154
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84923170138
VL - 21
JO - Journal of Architectural Engineering
JF - Journal of Architectural Engineering
SN - 1076-0431
IS - 1
M1 - 05014005
ER -