Life-cycle assessment comparison for long-span cable and truss structural systems

Case study

Matthew Trussoni, Evan Simatic, Christopher H. Raebel, H. Peter Huttelmaier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The architectural engineer has a considerable influence on the sustainability of buildings. The reduction in environmental impacts of building materials, as measured by life-cycle assessment (LCA), has recently become a focus in construction sustainability initiatives. The LCA comparisons of material alternatives in building structures, like concrete and steel, have not captured the material efficiency that the comparisons of structural system alternatives can provide. This paper compares the LCAs of two long-span structural systems, a truss system and a cable system, for the same application. Lower environmental outcomes are shown for the cable system when comparing the two systems' LCAs. Results showed a 29% reduction in structural system mass, a 65.1% reduction in embodied energy, and a 67.2% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions when comparing the cable to the truss system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number05014005
JournalJournal of Architectural Engineering
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Life cycle
Cables
Sustainable development
Environmental impact
Carbon dioxide
Concretes
Engineers
Case System
Life Cycle
Truss
Steel

Keywords

  • Case study
  • Efficiency
  • Environmental issues
  • Life cycles
  • Structural design
  • Structural systems
  • Sustainable buildings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Architecture
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Cite this

Life-cycle assessment comparison for long-span cable and truss structural systems : Case study. / Trussoni, Matthew; Simatic, Evan; Raebel, Christopher H.; Huttelmaier, H. Peter.

In: Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 1, 05014005, 01.03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trussoni, Matthew ; Simatic, Evan ; Raebel, Christopher H. ; Huttelmaier, H. Peter. / Life-cycle assessment comparison for long-span cable and truss structural systems : Case study. In: Journal of Architectural Engineering. 2015 ; Vol. 21, No. 1.
@article{892e1fff5f41410e9eaf5101a8a1ef8b,
title = "Life-cycle assessment comparison for long-span cable and truss structural systems: Case study",
abstract = "The architectural engineer has a considerable influence on the sustainability of buildings. The reduction in environmental impacts of building materials, as measured by life-cycle assessment (LCA), has recently become a focus in construction sustainability initiatives. The LCA comparisons of material alternatives in building structures, like concrete and steel, have not captured the material efficiency that the comparisons of structural system alternatives can provide. This paper compares the LCAs of two long-span structural systems, a truss system and a cable system, for the same application. Lower environmental outcomes are shown for the cable system when comparing the two systems' LCAs. Results showed a 29{\%} reduction in structural system mass, a 65.1{\%} reduction in embodied energy, and a 67.2{\%} reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions when comparing the cable to the truss system.",
keywords = "Case study, Efficiency, Environmental issues, Life cycles, Structural design, Structural systems, Sustainable buildings",
author = "Matthew Trussoni and Evan Simatic and Raebel, {Christopher H.} and Huttelmaier, {H. Peter}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000154",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
journal = "Journal of Architectural Engineering",
issn = "1076-0431",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Life-cycle assessment comparison for long-span cable and truss structural systems

T2 - Case study

AU - Trussoni, Matthew

AU - Simatic, Evan

AU - Raebel, Christopher H.

AU - Huttelmaier, H. Peter

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - The architectural engineer has a considerable influence on the sustainability of buildings. The reduction in environmental impacts of building materials, as measured by life-cycle assessment (LCA), has recently become a focus in construction sustainability initiatives. The LCA comparisons of material alternatives in building structures, like concrete and steel, have not captured the material efficiency that the comparisons of structural system alternatives can provide. This paper compares the LCAs of two long-span structural systems, a truss system and a cable system, for the same application. Lower environmental outcomes are shown for the cable system when comparing the two systems' LCAs. Results showed a 29% reduction in structural system mass, a 65.1% reduction in embodied energy, and a 67.2% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions when comparing the cable to the truss system.

AB - The architectural engineer has a considerable influence on the sustainability of buildings. The reduction in environmental impacts of building materials, as measured by life-cycle assessment (LCA), has recently become a focus in construction sustainability initiatives. The LCA comparisons of material alternatives in building structures, like concrete and steel, have not captured the material efficiency that the comparisons of structural system alternatives can provide. This paper compares the LCAs of two long-span structural systems, a truss system and a cable system, for the same application. Lower environmental outcomes are shown for the cable system when comparing the two systems' LCAs. Results showed a 29% reduction in structural system mass, a 65.1% reduction in embodied energy, and a 67.2% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions when comparing the cable to the truss system.

KW - Case study

KW - Efficiency

KW - Environmental issues

KW - Life cycles

KW - Structural design

KW - Structural systems

KW - Sustainable buildings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923170138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923170138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000154

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000154

M3 - Article

VL - 21

JO - Journal of Architectural Engineering

JF - Journal of Architectural Engineering

SN - 1076-0431

IS - 1

M1 - 05014005

ER -