LGBTI rights and the 2017 German national election

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines the 2017 German national election through the lens of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) interests. It depicts the ways in which sexual minorities articulated their policy preferences, the degree to which these positions were taken up in party platforms and electoral discourse, and the extent to which the resulting coalition agreement pledged to address queer citizens' concerns. I argue that, as a result of what Sarah Childs and Mona Lena Krook call a critical actor, this election provided sexual minorities with a high degree of responsiveness on one core issue: marriage equality. Other issues of interest to LGBTI voters, however, remained largely invisible. The conclusions here are based on analysis of primary documents including interest group statements, party platforms, and coalition agreements, as well as on German-language news coverage of the election campaign.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-54
Number of pages28
JournalGerman Politics and Society
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

party platform
coalition
election
minority
German language
election campaign
interest group
equality
news
marriage
coverage
citizen
discourse
Lesbian
Elections
Sexual
Bisexual
Minorities

Keywords

  • Critical actors
  • Intersex
  • LGBT
  • Same-sex marriage
  • Sexual minorities
  • Transgender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

LGBTI rights and the 2017 German national election. / Davidson-Schmich, Louise.

In: German Politics and Society, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 27-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed32e7c485fe4651a96fd958e0092e8d,
title = "LGBTI rights and the 2017 German national election",
abstract = "This article examines the 2017 German national election through the lens of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) interests. It depicts the ways in which sexual minorities articulated their policy preferences, the degree to which these positions were taken up in party platforms and electoral discourse, and the extent to which the resulting coalition agreement pledged to address queer citizens' concerns. I argue that, as a result of what Sarah Childs and Mona Lena Krook call a critical actor, this election provided sexual minorities with a high degree of responsiveness on one core issue: marriage equality. Other issues of interest to LGBTI voters, however, remained largely invisible. The conclusions here are based on analysis of primary documents including interest group statements, party platforms, and coalition agreements, as well as on German-language news coverage of the election campaign.",
keywords = "Critical actors, Intersex, LGBT, Same-sex marriage, Sexual minorities, Transgender",
author = "Louise Davidson-Schmich",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3167/gps.2018.360203",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "27--54",
journal = "German Politics and Society",
issn = "1045-0300",
publisher = "Center for European Studies, Harvard University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - LGBTI rights and the 2017 German national election

AU - Davidson-Schmich, Louise

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This article examines the 2017 German national election through the lens of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) interests. It depicts the ways in which sexual minorities articulated their policy preferences, the degree to which these positions were taken up in party platforms and electoral discourse, and the extent to which the resulting coalition agreement pledged to address queer citizens' concerns. I argue that, as a result of what Sarah Childs and Mona Lena Krook call a critical actor, this election provided sexual minorities with a high degree of responsiveness on one core issue: marriage equality. Other issues of interest to LGBTI voters, however, remained largely invisible. The conclusions here are based on analysis of primary documents including interest group statements, party platforms, and coalition agreements, as well as on German-language news coverage of the election campaign.

AB - This article examines the 2017 German national election through the lens of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) interests. It depicts the ways in which sexual minorities articulated their policy preferences, the degree to which these positions were taken up in party platforms and electoral discourse, and the extent to which the resulting coalition agreement pledged to address queer citizens' concerns. I argue that, as a result of what Sarah Childs and Mona Lena Krook call a critical actor, this election provided sexual minorities with a high degree of responsiveness on one core issue: marriage equality. Other issues of interest to LGBTI voters, however, remained largely invisible. The conclusions here are based on analysis of primary documents including interest group statements, party platforms, and coalition agreements, as well as on German-language news coverage of the election campaign.

KW - Critical actors

KW - Intersex

KW - LGBT

KW - Same-sex marriage

KW - Sexual minorities

KW - Transgender

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049233657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049233657&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3167/gps.2018.360203

DO - 10.3167/gps.2018.360203

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049233657

VL - 36

SP - 27

EP - 54

JO - German Politics and Society

JF - German Politics and Society

SN - 1045-0300

IS - 2

ER -