Letter to the editor

Fred Landis; Peter Wald; Richard S Weisman; Neal Lewin; Neal Flomenbaum; Lewis Goldfrank

doi:10.3109/15563658408992580

Letter to the editor

Fred Landis, Peter Wald, Richard S Weisman, Neal Lewin, Neal Flomenbaum, Lewis Goldfrank

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

We read with great interest the article comparing physostigmine and naloxone in the treatment of acute heroin overdose (Rupreht and Dwodacek, Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology, 21(3), 387-397, 1984). However, we take issue with a number of points in the study and in the interpretation of the data submitted.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	493-498
Number of pages	6
Journal	Clinical Toxicology
Volume	22
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3109/15563658408992580
State	Published - Jan 1 1984
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Toxicology

Access to Document

10.3109/15563658408992580

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Letter to the editor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{d3b416ba42f2484280fd829747d8fb12,

title = "Letter to the editor",

abstract = "We read with great interest the article comparing physostigmine and naloxone in the treatment of acute heroin overdose (Rupreht and Dwodacek, Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology, 21(3), 387-397, 1984). However, we take issue with a number of points in the study and in the interpretation of the data submitted.",

author = "Fred Landis and Peter Wald and Weisman, {Richard S} and Neal Lewin and Neal Flomenbaum and Lewis Goldfrank",

year = "1984",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3109/15563658408992580",

language = "English",

volume = "22",

pages = "493--498",

journal = "Clinical Toxicology",

issn = "1556-3650",

publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Letter to the editor

AU - Landis, Fred

AU - Wald, Peter

AU - Weisman, Richard S

AU - Lewin, Neal

AU - Flomenbaum, Neal

AU - Goldfrank, Lewis

PY - 1984/1/1

Y1 - 1984/1/1

N2 - We read with great interest the article comparing physostigmine and naloxone in the treatment of acute heroin overdose (Rupreht and Dwodacek, Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology, 21(3), 387-397, 1984). However, we take issue with a number of points in the study and in the interpretation of the data submitted.

AB - We read with great interest the article comparing physostigmine and naloxone in the treatment of acute heroin overdose (Rupreht and Dwodacek, Journal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology, 21(3), 387-397, 1984). However, we take issue with a number of points in the study and in the interpretation of the data submitted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907130384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907130384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/15563658408992580

DO - 10.3109/15563658408992580

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 493

EP - 498

JO - Clinical Toxicology

JF - Clinical Toxicology

SN - 1556-3650

IS - 5

ER -