Left anterior small thoracotomy versus coronary artery bypass graft for single-vessel occlusion

A cost identification analysis

Eric Nauenberg, Joan M. Dorn, Tomas Salerno, Jacob Bergsland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Single-vessel bypass can often be accomplished through less invasive techniques than conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) at substantially lower cost. We undertook a study to empirically determine the cost savings associated with one such technique, left anterior small thoracotomy (LAST). Methods: Reviewing medical and billing records, we measured the difference in hospitalization costs between two methods of coronary bypass surgery. The study groups consisted of 50 patients who underwent LAST and 28 who underwent single-vessel conventional CABG during 1995 and 1996. A subsequent validation sample of 50 patients who underwent LAST was also analyzed. Hospitalization costs were estimated using a relative value unit methodology and were risk-adjusted for both perioperative risk factors and changes in operating room technology. Results: Risk-adjusted hospitalization costs for those undergoing LAST were $9,510 and $12,546 for the CABG control subjects (p < .01), with differences in surgical costs reflecting over 62% of this overall difference. Differences in average length of stay were under a half-day (10.0 for LAST vs. 10.46 for CABG). Only one inpatient fatality was reported; therefore, no inference regarding mortality differences could be made. Conclusions: LAST is substantially less costly than conventional surgery, and the savings are potentially greater if hospital length of stay is reduced to a clinically recommended time of 2 days.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-269
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Thoracotomy
Coronary Artery Bypass
Transplants
Costs and Cost Analysis
Length of Stay
Hospitalization
Cost Savings
Operating Rooms
Medical Records
Inpatients
Technology
Mortality

Keywords

  • Coronary bypass
  • Cost identification
  • Risk adjustment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Left anterior small thoracotomy versus coronary artery bypass graft for single-vessel occlusion : A cost identification analysis. / Nauenberg, Eric; Dorn, Joan M.; Salerno, Tomas; Bergsland, Jacob.

In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.12.2000, p. 260-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f0c91becfaeb4dc1965e60362e0a7fc4,
title = "Left anterior small thoracotomy versus coronary artery bypass graft for single-vessel occlusion: A cost identification analysis",
abstract = "Objectives: Single-vessel bypass can often be accomplished through less invasive techniques than conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) at substantially lower cost. We undertook a study to empirically determine the cost savings associated with one such technique, left anterior small thoracotomy (LAST). Methods: Reviewing medical and billing records, we measured the difference in hospitalization costs between two methods of coronary bypass surgery. The study groups consisted of 50 patients who underwent LAST and 28 who underwent single-vessel conventional CABG during 1995 and 1996. A subsequent validation sample of 50 patients who underwent LAST was also analyzed. Hospitalization costs were estimated using a relative value unit methodology and were risk-adjusted for both perioperative risk factors and changes in operating room technology. Results: Risk-adjusted hospitalization costs for those undergoing LAST were $9,510 and $12,546 for the CABG control subjects (p < .01), with differences in surgical costs reflecting over 62{\%} of this overall difference. Differences in average length of stay were under a half-day (10.0 for LAST vs. 10.46 for CABG). Only one inpatient fatality was reported; therefore, no inference regarding mortality differences could be made. Conclusions: LAST is substantially less costly than conventional surgery, and the savings are potentially greater if hospital length of stay is reduced to a clinically recommended time of 2 days.",
keywords = "Coronary bypass, Cost identification, Risk adjustment",
author = "Eric Nauenberg and Dorn, {Joan M.} and Tomas Salerno and Jacob Bergsland",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0266462300161252",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "260--269",
journal = "International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care",
issn = "0266-4623",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Left anterior small thoracotomy versus coronary artery bypass graft for single-vessel occlusion

T2 - A cost identification analysis

AU - Nauenberg, Eric

AU - Dorn, Joan M.

AU - Salerno, Tomas

AU - Bergsland, Jacob

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - Objectives: Single-vessel bypass can often be accomplished through less invasive techniques than conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) at substantially lower cost. We undertook a study to empirically determine the cost savings associated with one such technique, left anterior small thoracotomy (LAST). Methods: Reviewing medical and billing records, we measured the difference in hospitalization costs between two methods of coronary bypass surgery. The study groups consisted of 50 patients who underwent LAST and 28 who underwent single-vessel conventional CABG during 1995 and 1996. A subsequent validation sample of 50 patients who underwent LAST was also analyzed. Hospitalization costs were estimated using a relative value unit methodology and were risk-adjusted for both perioperative risk factors and changes in operating room technology. Results: Risk-adjusted hospitalization costs for those undergoing LAST were $9,510 and $12,546 for the CABG control subjects (p < .01), with differences in surgical costs reflecting over 62% of this overall difference. Differences in average length of stay were under a half-day (10.0 for LAST vs. 10.46 for CABG). Only one inpatient fatality was reported; therefore, no inference regarding mortality differences could be made. Conclusions: LAST is substantially less costly than conventional surgery, and the savings are potentially greater if hospital length of stay is reduced to a clinically recommended time of 2 days.

AB - Objectives: Single-vessel bypass can often be accomplished through less invasive techniques than conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) at substantially lower cost. We undertook a study to empirically determine the cost savings associated with one such technique, left anterior small thoracotomy (LAST). Methods: Reviewing medical and billing records, we measured the difference in hospitalization costs between two methods of coronary bypass surgery. The study groups consisted of 50 patients who underwent LAST and 28 who underwent single-vessel conventional CABG during 1995 and 1996. A subsequent validation sample of 50 patients who underwent LAST was also analyzed. Hospitalization costs were estimated using a relative value unit methodology and were risk-adjusted for both perioperative risk factors and changes in operating room technology. Results: Risk-adjusted hospitalization costs for those undergoing LAST were $9,510 and $12,546 for the CABG control subjects (p < .01), with differences in surgical costs reflecting over 62% of this overall difference. Differences in average length of stay were under a half-day (10.0 for LAST vs. 10.46 for CABG). Only one inpatient fatality was reported; therefore, no inference regarding mortality differences could be made. Conclusions: LAST is substantially less costly than conventional surgery, and the savings are potentially greater if hospital length of stay is reduced to a clinically recommended time of 2 days.

KW - Coronary bypass

KW - Cost identification

KW - Risk adjustment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034119504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034119504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0266462300161252

DO - 10.1017/S0266462300161252

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 260

EP - 269

JO - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

JF - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

SN - 0266-4623

IS - 1

ER -