Learning jazz, teaching jazz

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Not everyone has subscribed to the idea that all people can learn to play jazz. Since the time of the earliest accounts of the music, many writers and audiences have perceived jazz as a ‘natural expression’ of the performers rather than as a learned and practised behaviour. This perception has taken two predominant modes: that the ability to play jazz passes mysteriously from some invisible source through select ‘great’ individuals (i.e., geniuses), or that jazz springs forth from a subconscious and unmediated ‘voice of the people’, more specifically, an apparently unified African-American population. Prevalent as these notions have been, however, neither of them explains certain fundamental aspects of musical performance, and this chapter will focus on some of the ways in which jazz musicians have acquired and handed down to others the practical knowledge of their craft. It will investigate both the informal venues in which individuals learn how to play jazz and, in somewhat greater depth, some of the methods, values and influences of the relatively recent institutionalisation of jazz pedagogy, commonly referred to now as ‘jazz education’. But before turning to these issues, it may be helpful to review briefly the attitudes and beliefs behind the aforementioned ‘natural expression’ perceptions. ‘Some folks got it and some folks ain't’: Public notions of jazz as the product of either biology or genius are rooted in a number of historical and cultural domains. First, white audiences and critics around the turn of the twentieth century had come to understand music largely as a notated phenomenon, the craft of improvisation in European-based styles having gradually died out over the course of the previous decades. Consequently, these listeners marvelled at the ability of jazz musicians to vary, embellish and invent melodic lines, seemingly effortlessly and ‘out of thin air’ (see, for example, Ansermet 1919).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Companion to Jazz
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages253-269
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781139002233
ISBN (Print)9780521663205
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Teaching
Jazz
Genius
Jazz musicians
Music
Performer
Pedagogy
Improvisation
Listeners
African Americans
Invisible
Fundamental
Venues
Education
Writer
Institutionalization
Practical Knowledge
Musical Performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Ake, D. (2003). Learning jazz, teaching jazz. In The Cambridge Companion to Jazz (pp. 253-269). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521663205.015

Learning jazz, teaching jazz. / Ake, David.

The Cambridge Companion to Jazz. Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 253-269.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Ake, D 2003, Learning jazz, teaching jazz. in The Cambridge Companion to Jazz. Cambridge University Press, pp. 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521663205.015
Ake D. Learning jazz, teaching jazz. In The Cambridge Companion to Jazz. Cambridge University Press. 2003. p. 253-269 https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521663205.015
Ake, David. / Learning jazz, teaching jazz. The Cambridge Companion to Jazz. Cambridge University Press, 2003. pp. 253-269
@inbook{45caf47c3fba4c99bedc6e4432d92b8c,
title = "Learning jazz, teaching jazz",
abstract = "Not everyone has subscribed to the idea that all people can learn to play jazz. Since the time of the earliest accounts of the music, many writers and audiences have perceived jazz as a ‘natural expression’ of the performers rather than as a learned and practised behaviour. This perception has taken two predominant modes: that the ability to play jazz passes mysteriously from some invisible source through select ‘great’ individuals (i.e., geniuses), or that jazz springs forth from a subconscious and unmediated ‘voice of the people’, more specifically, an apparently unified African-American population. Prevalent as these notions have been, however, neither of them explains certain fundamental aspects of musical performance, and this chapter will focus on some of the ways in which jazz musicians have acquired and handed down to others the practical knowledge of their craft. It will investigate both the informal venues in which individuals learn how to play jazz and, in somewhat greater depth, some of the methods, values and influences of the relatively recent institutionalisation of jazz pedagogy, commonly referred to now as ‘jazz education’. But before turning to these issues, it may be helpful to review briefly the attitudes and beliefs behind the aforementioned ‘natural expression’ perceptions. ‘Some folks got it and some folks ain't’: Public notions of jazz as the product of either biology or genius are rooted in a number of historical and cultural domains. First, white audiences and critics around the turn of the twentieth century had come to understand music largely as a notated phenomenon, the craft of improvisation in European-based styles having gradually died out over the course of the previous decades. Consequently, these listeners marvelled at the ability of jazz musicians to vary, embellish and invent melodic lines, seemingly effortlessly and ‘out of thin air’ (see, for example, Ansermet 1919).",
author = "David Ake",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CCOL9780521663205.015",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521663205",
pages = "253--269",
booktitle = "The Cambridge Companion to Jazz",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Learning jazz, teaching jazz

AU - Ake, David

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Not everyone has subscribed to the idea that all people can learn to play jazz. Since the time of the earliest accounts of the music, many writers and audiences have perceived jazz as a ‘natural expression’ of the performers rather than as a learned and practised behaviour. This perception has taken two predominant modes: that the ability to play jazz passes mysteriously from some invisible source through select ‘great’ individuals (i.e., geniuses), or that jazz springs forth from a subconscious and unmediated ‘voice of the people’, more specifically, an apparently unified African-American population. Prevalent as these notions have been, however, neither of them explains certain fundamental aspects of musical performance, and this chapter will focus on some of the ways in which jazz musicians have acquired and handed down to others the practical knowledge of their craft. It will investigate both the informal venues in which individuals learn how to play jazz and, in somewhat greater depth, some of the methods, values and influences of the relatively recent institutionalisation of jazz pedagogy, commonly referred to now as ‘jazz education’. But before turning to these issues, it may be helpful to review briefly the attitudes and beliefs behind the aforementioned ‘natural expression’ perceptions. ‘Some folks got it and some folks ain't’: Public notions of jazz as the product of either biology or genius are rooted in a number of historical and cultural domains. First, white audiences and critics around the turn of the twentieth century had come to understand music largely as a notated phenomenon, the craft of improvisation in European-based styles having gradually died out over the course of the previous decades. Consequently, these listeners marvelled at the ability of jazz musicians to vary, embellish and invent melodic lines, seemingly effortlessly and ‘out of thin air’ (see, for example, Ansermet 1919).

AB - Not everyone has subscribed to the idea that all people can learn to play jazz. Since the time of the earliest accounts of the music, many writers and audiences have perceived jazz as a ‘natural expression’ of the performers rather than as a learned and practised behaviour. This perception has taken two predominant modes: that the ability to play jazz passes mysteriously from some invisible source through select ‘great’ individuals (i.e., geniuses), or that jazz springs forth from a subconscious and unmediated ‘voice of the people’, more specifically, an apparently unified African-American population. Prevalent as these notions have been, however, neither of them explains certain fundamental aspects of musical performance, and this chapter will focus on some of the ways in which jazz musicians have acquired and handed down to others the practical knowledge of their craft. It will investigate both the informal venues in which individuals learn how to play jazz and, in somewhat greater depth, some of the methods, values and influences of the relatively recent institutionalisation of jazz pedagogy, commonly referred to now as ‘jazz education’. But before turning to these issues, it may be helpful to review briefly the attitudes and beliefs behind the aforementioned ‘natural expression’ perceptions. ‘Some folks got it and some folks ain't’: Public notions of jazz as the product of either biology or genius are rooted in a number of historical and cultural domains. First, white audiences and critics around the turn of the twentieth century had come to understand music largely as a notated phenomenon, the craft of improvisation in European-based styles having gradually died out over the course of the previous decades. Consequently, these listeners marvelled at the ability of jazz musicians to vary, embellish and invent melodic lines, seemingly effortlessly and ‘out of thin air’ (see, for example, Ansermet 1919).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923501273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923501273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CCOL9780521663205.015

DO - 10.1017/CCOL9780521663205.015

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780521663205

SP - 253

EP - 269

BT - The Cambridge Companion to Jazz

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -