Leader-group interactions: A longitudinal field investigation

Charles N. Greene, Chester Schriesheim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Investigated relationships among subordinate perceptions of instrumental and supportive leader behavior and group arousal and cohesiveness. Identical questionnaire measures (i.e., modified versions of the Structure and Consideration subscales of the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire; portions of W. E. Scott's [1967] semantic differential) of the 4 variables were administered to employees in 123 work groups in 4 organizations at 2 points in time (separated by 6 mo). Two moderator variables, recency of group formation and group size, were also measured. All responses were averaged within the work group, to produce group scores. Using cross-lagged correlational and path analytic procedures, the effect of each assumed independent variable (leader behavior) on each dependent variable (group arousal or cohesiveness) was assessed under moderated (e.g., large vs small group size) and unmoderated conditions. Both leader behaviors were found to positively influence group arousal and cohesion. As predicted, instrumental leadership had particularly strong effects on arousal and cohesiveness in both large and new groups. Supportive leadership exerted its greatest influence in small as well as new groups. (30 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-59
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1980
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Arousal
Semantic Differential
Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • instrumental & supportive leader behavior & group size & recency of formation, group arousal/productivity & cohesiveness, employees in work groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Leader-group interactions : A longitudinal field investigation. / Greene, Charles N.; Schriesheim, Chester.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 65, No. 1, 02.1980, p. 50-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{eb20b9863e1147fca2de222c58f8a893,
title = "Leader-group interactions: A longitudinal field investigation",
abstract = "Investigated relationships among subordinate perceptions of instrumental and supportive leader behavior and group arousal and cohesiveness. Identical questionnaire measures (i.e., modified versions of the Structure and Consideration subscales of the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire; portions of W. E. Scott's [1967] semantic differential) of the 4 variables were administered to employees in 123 work groups in 4 organizations at 2 points in time (separated by 6 mo). Two moderator variables, recency of group formation and group size, were also measured. All responses were averaged within the work group, to produce group scores. Using cross-lagged correlational and path analytic procedures, the effect of each assumed independent variable (leader behavior) on each dependent variable (group arousal or cohesiveness) was assessed under moderated (e.g., large vs small group size) and unmoderated conditions. Both leader behaviors were found to positively influence group arousal and cohesion. As predicted, instrumental leadership had particularly strong effects on arousal and cohesiveness in both large and new groups. Supportive leadership exerted its greatest influence in small as well as new groups. (30 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "instrumental & supportive leader behavior & group size & recency of formation, group arousal/productivity & cohesiveness, employees in work groups",
author = "Greene, {Charles N.} and Chester Schriesheim",
year = "1980",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.50",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "50--59",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leader-group interactions

T2 - A longitudinal field investigation

AU - Greene, Charles N.

AU - Schriesheim, Chester

PY - 1980/2

Y1 - 1980/2

N2 - Investigated relationships among subordinate perceptions of instrumental and supportive leader behavior and group arousal and cohesiveness. Identical questionnaire measures (i.e., modified versions of the Structure and Consideration subscales of the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire; portions of W. E. Scott's [1967] semantic differential) of the 4 variables were administered to employees in 123 work groups in 4 organizations at 2 points in time (separated by 6 mo). Two moderator variables, recency of group formation and group size, were also measured. All responses were averaged within the work group, to produce group scores. Using cross-lagged correlational and path analytic procedures, the effect of each assumed independent variable (leader behavior) on each dependent variable (group arousal or cohesiveness) was assessed under moderated (e.g., large vs small group size) and unmoderated conditions. Both leader behaviors were found to positively influence group arousal and cohesion. As predicted, instrumental leadership had particularly strong effects on arousal and cohesiveness in both large and new groups. Supportive leadership exerted its greatest influence in small as well as new groups. (30 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Investigated relationships among subordinate perceptions of instrumental and supportive leader behavior and group arousal and cohesiveness. Identical questionnaire measures (i.e., modified versions of the Structure and Consideration subscales of the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire; portions of W. E. Scott's [1967] semantic differential) of the 4 variables were administered to employees in 123 work groups in 4 organizations at 2 points in time (separated by 6 mo). Two moderator variables, recency of group formation and group size, were also measured. All responses were averaged within the work group, to produce group scores. Using cross-lagged correlational and path analytic procedures, the effect of each assumed independent variable (leader behavior) on each dependent variable (group arousal or cohesiveness) was assessed under moderated (e.g., large vs small group size) and unmoderated conditions. Both leader behaviors were found to positively influence group arousal and cohesion. As predicted, instrumental leadership had particularly strong effects on arousal and cohesiveness in both large and new groups. Supportive leadership exerted its greatest influence in small as well as new groups. (30 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - instrumental & supportive leader behavior & group size & recency of formation, group arousal/productivity & cohesiveness, employees in work groups

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001997877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001997877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.50

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.50

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001997877

VL - 65

SP - 50

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 1

ER -