Lead extraction experience with high frequency excimer laser

Tanyanan Tanawuttiwat, Daniel Gallego, Roger Carrillo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Methods In this single center, retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients who underwent lead extraction from December 2008 to May 2013. Those who underwent lead removal without using a laser sheath or with approaches other than subclavian were excluded. Primary endpoints included total laser time, number of pulses, and complications. Data on clinical characteristics, lead type, indications, and outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed.

Results A total of 427 patients were included in the study (72.6% male; age 67.9 ± 15.23 years). Lower frequency and higher frequency laser sheaths were used in 315 and 112 patients, respectively. A total of 821 leads were removed with 765 leads (93.2%) extracted using the Excimer laser sheath. Lead age was 5.71 ± 4.96 years. Complete extraction was seen in all patients. A higher-frequency laser sheath was associated with a lower laser time and a lower total number of laser pulses even after adjustments for the number of leads, type of leads, and lead age. In the higher frequency group, mortality rate was 0.9% and minor complication rate was 3.6%.

Conclusions When compared with the lower-frequency laser sheath, the higher-frequency laser sheath requires less laser times and more efficient amount of pulses for lead extraction with comparable success rate. Due to the rarity of major and minor complications, no statistical significance was found between the two groups.

Background A higher frequency Excimer laser sheath using an 80-Hz pulse repetitive rate was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in April 2012. We reported our initial clinical experience with a high-frequency Excimer laser sheath and compared it with lower-frequency laser sheaths which have been previously used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1120-1128
Number of pages9
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume37
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Excimer Lasers
Lasers
Lead
United States Food and Drug Administration
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Heart Rate

Keywords

  • cardiac implantable electronic devices
  • complications
  • device infection
  • laser Excimer sheath
  • transvenous lead extraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Lead extraction experience with high frequency excimer laser. / Tanawuttiwat, Tanyanan; Gallego, Daniel; Carrillo, Roger.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 37, No. 9, 01.01.2014, p. 1120-1128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tanawuttiwat, Tanyanan ; Gallego, Daniel ; Carrillo, Roger. / Lead extraction experience with high frequency excimer laser. In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 2014 ; Vol. 37, No. 9. pp. 1120-1128.
@article{0f12c875a2394f54821c09d1fba0bfc3,
title = "Lead extraction experience with high frequency excimer laser",
abstract = "Methods In this single center, retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients who underwent lead extraction from December 2008 to May 2013. Those who underwent lead removal without using a laser sheath or with approaches other than subclavian were excluded. Primary endpoints included total laser time, number of pulses, and complications. Data on clinical characteristics, lead type, indications, and outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed.Results A total of 427 patients were included in the study (72.6{\%} male; age 67.9 ± 15.23 years). Lower frequency and higher frequency laser sheaths were used in 315 and 112 patients, respectively. A total of 821 leads were removed with 765 leads (93.2{\%}) extracted using the Excimer laser sheath. Lead age was 5.71 ± 4.96 years. Complete extraction was seen in all patients. A higher-frequency laser sheath was associated with a lower laser time and a lower total number of laser pulses even after adjustments for the number of leads, type of leads, and lead age. In the higher frequency group, mortality rate was 0.9{\%} and minor complication rate was 3.6{\%}.Conclusions When compared with the lower-frequency laser sheath, the higher-frequency laser sheath requires less laser times and more efficient amount of pulses for lead extraction with comparable success rate. Due to the rarity of major and minor complications, no statistical significance was found between the two groups.Background A higher frequency Excimer laser sheath using an 80-Hz pulse repetitive rate was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in April 2012. We reported our initial clinical experience with a high-frequency Excimer laser sheath and compared it with lower-frequency laser sheaths which have been previously used.",
keywords = "cardiac implantable electronic devices, complications, device infection, laser Excimer sheath, transvenous lead extraction",
author = "Tanyanan Tanawuttiwat and Daniel Gallego and Roger Carrillo",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pace.12406",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1120--1128",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lead extraction experience with high frequency excimer laser

AU - Tanawuttiwat, Tanyanan

AU - Gallego, Daniel

AU - Carrillo, Roger

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Methods In this single center, retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients who underwent lead extraction from December 2008 to May 2013. Those who underwent lead removal without using a laser sheath or with approaches other than subclavian were excluded. Primary endpoints included total laser time, number of pulses, and complications. Data on clinical characteristics, lead type, indications, and outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed.Results A total of 427 patients were included in the study (72.6% male; age 67.9 ± 15.23 years). Lower frequency and higher frequency laser sheaths were used in 315 and 112 patients, respectively. A total of 821 leads were removed with 765 leads (93.2%) extracted using the Excimer laser sheath. Lead age was 5.71 ± 4.96 years. Complete extraction was seen in all patients. A higher-frequency laser sheath was associated with a lower laser time and a lower total number of laser pulses even after adjustments for the number of leads, type of leads, and lead age. In the higher frequency group, mortality rate was 0.9% and minor complication rate was 3.6%.Conclusions When compared with the lower-frequency laser sheath, the higher-frequency laser sheath requires less laser times and more efficient amount of pulses for lead extraction with comparable success rate. Due to the rarity of major and minor complications, no statistical significance was found between the two groups.Background A higher frequency Excimer laser sheath using an 80-Hz pulse repetitive rate was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in April 2012. We reported our initial clinical experience with a high-frequency Excimer laser sheath and compared it with lower-frequency laser sheaths which have been previously used.

AB - Methods In this single center, retrospective cohort study, we evaluated patients who underwent lead extraction from December 2008 to May 2013. Those who underwent lead removal without using a laser sheath or with approaches other than subclavian were excluded. Primary endpoints included total laser time, number of pulses, and complications. Data on clinical characteristics, lead type, indications, and outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed.Results A total of 427 patients were included in the study (72.6% male; age 67.9 ± 15.23 years). Lower frequency and higher frequency laser sheaths were used in 315 and 112 patients, respectively. A total of 821 leads were removed with 765 leads (93.2%) extracted using the Excimer laser sheath. Lead age was 5.71 ± 4.96 years. Complete extraction was seen in all patients. A higher-frequency laser sheath was associated with a lower laser time and a lower total number of laser pulses even after adjustments for the number of leads, type of leads, and lead age. In the higher frequency group, mortality rate was 0.9% and minor complication rate was 3.6%.Conclusions When compared with the lower-frequency laser sheath, the higher-frequency laser sheath requires less laser times and more efficient amount of pulses for lead extraction with comparable success rate. Due to the rarity of major and minor complications, no statistical significance was found between the two groups.Background A higher frequency Excimer laser sheath using an 80-Hz pulse repetitive rate was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in April 2012. We reported our initial clinical experience with a high-frequency Excimer laser sheath and compared it with lower-frequency laser sheaths which have been previously used.

KW - cardiac implantable electronic devices

KW - complications

KW - device infection

KW - laser Excimer sheath

KW - transvenous lead extraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908250201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908250201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pace.12406

DO - 10.1111/pace.12406

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 1120

EP - 1128

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 9

ER -