Latent structure and reliability analysis of the measure of body apperception: Cross-validation for head and neck cancer Patients

Pascal Jean-Pierre, Christopher Fundakowski, Enrique Perez, Shadae E. Jean-Pierre, Ashley R. Jean-Pierre, Angelica B. Melillo, Rachel Libby, Zoukaa B Sargi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer and its treatments are associated with psychological distress that can negatively impact self-perception, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life. Patients with head and neck cancers (HNC) are particularly susceptible to psychological distress. This study involved a cross-validation of the Measure of Body Apperception (MBA) for HNC patients. Methods: One hundred and twenty-two English-fluent HNC patients between 20 and 88 years of age completed the MBA on a Likert scale ranging from "1 = disagree" to "4 = agree." We assessed the latent structure and internal consistency reliability of the MBA using Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Cronbach's coefficient alpha (α), respectively. We determined convergent and divergent validities of the MBA using correlations with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), observer disfigurement rating, and patients' clinical and demographic variables. Results: The PCA revealed a coherent set of items that explained 38 % of the variance. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.73 and the Bartlett's test of sphericity was statistically significant (χ 2 (28) = 253.64; p < 0.001), confirming the suitability of the data for dimension reduction analysis. The MBA had good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.77) and demonstrated adequate convergent and divergent validities based on statistically significant moderate correlations with the HADS (p < 0.01) and observer rating of disfigurement (p < 0.026) and nonstatistically significant correlations with patients' clinical and demographic variables: tumor location, age at diagnosis, and birth place (all p s > 0.05). Conclusions: The MBA is a valid and reliable screening measure of body apperception for HNC patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-598
Number of pages8
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

Body Weights and Measures
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Principal Component Analysis
Psychology
Second Primary Neoplasms
Self Concept
Anxiety
Quality of Life
Demography
Depression

Keywords

  • Body apperception
  • Cancer control
  • Head and neck cancer
  • Measurement development
  • Psychological distress
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of life
  • Symptom management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Cite this

Latent structure and reliability analysis of the measure of body apperception : Cross-validation for head and neck cancer Patients. / Jean-Pierre, Pascal; Fundakowski, Christopher; Perez, Enrique; Jean-Pierre, Shadae E.; Jean-Pierre, Ashley R.; Melillo, Angelica B.; Libby, Rachel; Sargi, Zoukaa B.

In: Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 591-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jean-Pierre, P, Fundakowski, C, Perez, E, Jean-Pierre, SE, Jean-Pierre, AR, Melillo, AB, Libby, R & Sargi, ZB 2013, 'Latent structure and reliability analysis of the measure of body apperception: Cross-validation for head and neck cancer Patients', Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 591-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1561-1
Jean-Pierre, Pascal ; Fundakowski, Christopher ; Perez, Enrique ; Jean-Pierre, Shadae E. ; Jean-Pierre, Ashley R. ; Melillo, Angelica B. ; Libby, Rachel ; Sargi, Zoukaa B. / Latent structure and reliability analysis of the measure of body apperception : Cross-validation for head and neck cancer Patients. In: Supportive Care in Cancer. 2013 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 591-598.
@article{02135f5edb774dc49908b682d7f84cd2,
title = "Latent structure and reliability analysis of the measure of body apperception: Cross-validation for head and neck cancer Patients",
abstract = "Purpose: Cancer and its treatments are associated with psychological distress that can negatively impact self-perception, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life. Patients with head and neck cancers (HNC) are particularly susceptible to psychological distress. This study involved a cross-validation of the Measure of Body Apperception (MBA) for HNC patients. Methods: One hundred and twenty-two English-fluent HNC patients between 20 and 88 years of age completed the MBA on a Likert scale ranging from {"}1 = disagree{"} to {"}4 = agree.{"} We assessed the latent structure and internal consistency reliability of the MBA using Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Cronbach's coefficient alpha (α), respectively. We determined convergent and divergent validities of the MBA using correlations with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), observer disfigurement rating, and patients' clinical and demographic variables. Results: The PCA revealed a coherent set of items that explained 38 {\%} of the variance. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.73 and the Bartlett's test of sphericity was statistically significant (χ 2 (28) = 253.64; p < 0.001), confirming the suitability of the data for dimension reduction analysis. The MBA had good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.77) and demonstrated adequate convergent and divergent validities based on statistically significant moderate correlations with the HADS (p < 0.01) and observer rating of disfigurement (p < 0.026) and nonstatistically significant correlations with patients' clinical and demographic variables: tumor location, age at diagnosis, and birth place (all p s > 0.05). Conclusions: The MBA is a valid and reliable screening measure of body apperception for HNC patients.",
keywords = "Body apperception, Cancer control, Head and neck cancer, Measurement development, Psychological distress, Psychometrics, Quality of life, Symptom management",
author = "Pascal Jean-Pierre and Christopher Fundakowski and Enrique Perez and Jean-Pierre, {Shadae E.} and Jean-Pierre, {Ashley R.} and Melillo, {Angelica B.} and Rachel Libby and Sargi, {Zoukaa B}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00520-012-1561-1",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "591--598",
journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
issn = "0941-4355",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Latent structure and reliability analysis of the measure of body apperception

T2 - Cross-validation for head and neck cancer Patients

AU - Jean-Pierre, Pascal

AU - Fundakowski, Christopher

AU - Perez, Enrique

AU - Jean-Pierre, Shadae E.

AU - Jean-Pierre, Ashley R.

AU - Melillo, Angelica B.

AU - Libby, Rachel

AU - Sargi, Zoukaa B

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Purpose: Cancer and its treatments are associated with psychological distress that can negatively impact self-perception, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life. Patients with head and neck cancers (HNC) are particularly susceptible to psychological distress. This study involved a cross-validation of the Measure of Body Apperception (MBA) for HNC patients. Methods: One hundred and twenty-two English-fluent HNC patients between 20 and 88 years of age completed the MBA on a Likert scale ranging from "1 = disagree" to "4 = agree." We assessed the latent structure and internal consistency reliability of the MBA using Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Cronbach's coefficient alpha (α), respectively. We determined convergent and divergent validities of the MBA using correlations with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), observer disfigurement rating, and patients' clinical and demographic variables. Results: The PCA revealed a coherent set of items that explained 38 % of the variance. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.73 and the Bartlett's test of sphericity was statistically significant (χ 2 (28) = 253.64; p < 0.001), confirming the suitability of the data for dimension reduction analysis. The MBA had good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.77) and demonstrated adequate convergent and divergent validities based on statistically significant moderate correlations with the HADS (p < 0.01) and observer rating of disfigurement (p < 0.026) and nonstatistically significant correlations with patients' clinical and demographic variables: tumor location, age at diagnosis, and birth place (all p s > 0.05). Conclusions: The MBA is a valid and reliable screening measure of body apperception for HNC patients.

AB - Purpose: Cancer and its treatments are associated with psychological distress that can negatively impact self-perception, psychosocial functioning, and quality of life. Patients with head and neck cancers (HNC) are particularly susceptible to psychological distress. This study involved a cross-validation of the Measure of Body Apperception (MBA) for HNC patients. Methods: One hundred and twenty-two English-fluent HNC patients between 20 and 88 years of age completed the MBA on a Likert scale ranging from "1 = disagree" to "4 = agree." We assessed the latent structure and internal consistency reliability of the MBA using Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Cronbach's coefficient alpha (α), respectively. We determined convergent and divergent validities of the MBA using correlations with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), observer disfigurement rating, and patients' clinical and demographic variables. Results: The PCA revealed a coherent set of items that explained 38 % of the variance. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.73 and the Bartlett's test of sphericity was statistically significant (χ 2 (28) = 253.64; p < 0.001), confirming the suitability of the data for dimension reduction analysis. The MBA had good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.77) and demonstrated adequate convergent and divergent validities based on statistically significant moderate correlations with the HADS (p < 0.01) and observer rating of disfigurement (p < 0.026) and nonstatistically significant correlations with patients' clinical and demographic variables: tumor location, age at diagnosis, and birth place (all p s > 0.05). Conclusions: The MBA is a valid and reliable screening measure of body apperception for HNC patients.

KW - Body apperception

KW - Cancer control

KW - Head and neck cancer

KW - Measurement development

KW - Psychological distress

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Quality of life

KW - Symptom management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874106638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874106638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00520-012-1561-1

DO - 10.1007/s00520-012-1561-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 22886430

AN - SCOPUS:84874106638

VL - 21

SP - 591

EP - 598

JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

SN - 0941-4355

IS - 2

ER -