Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal

Experience in 32 patients

A. Shanberg, L. Tansey, R. Baghdassarian, D. Sawyer, Charles M Lynne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A Food and Drug Administration approved protocol using a microsurgical carbon dioxide laser to assist in vasectomy reversal was instituted in January 1987. Between January 1987 and December 1988 the procedure was performed on 32 patients, 31 of whom submitted sperm and were available to evaluate. Success rates for sperm in the ejaculate in patients who underwent vasectomy less than 10 years previously were excellent, approaching 95%. The pregnancy rate in this group was 35%. In patients whose vasectomy was performed more than 10 years before reversal the results were much poorer. The success rate for sperm in the ejaculate was only 36% and the pregnancy rate was only 9%. The advantage of laser-assisted vasectomy reversal is that it is a simpler technical procedure that requires considerably less time than a 2-layer microsurgical technique. There were no significant complications, sperm granuloma, or even significant swelling or hematoma in any patient operated upon. Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal is at least equal to conventional microsurgical techniques and definitely easier to perform surgically.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)528-529
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume143
Issue number3
StatePublished - Apr 3 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vasovasostomy
Spermatozoa
Lasers
Vasectomy
Pregnancy Rate
Gas Lasers
United States Food and Drug Administration
Granuloma
Hematoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Shanberg, A., Tansey, L., Baghdassarian, R., Sawyer, D., & Lynne, C. M. (1990). Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal: Experience in 32 patients. Journal of Urology, 143(3), 528-529.

Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal : Experience in 32 patients. / Shanberg, A.; Tansey, L.; Baghdassarian, R.; Sawyer, D.; Lynne, Charles M.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 143, No. 3, 03.04.1990, p. 528-529.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shanberg, A, Tansey, L, Baghdassarian, R, Sawyer, D & Lynne, CM 1990, 'Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal: Experience in 32 patients', Journal of Urology, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 528-529.
Shanberg A, Tansey L, Baghdassarian R, Sawyer D, Lynne CM. Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal: Experience in 32 patients. Journal of Urology. 1990 Apr 3;143(3):528-529.
Shanberg, A. ; Tansey, L. ; Baghdassarian, R. ; Sawyer, D. ; Lynne, Charles M. / Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal : Experience in 32 patients. In: Journal of Urology. 1990 ; Vol. 143, No. 3. pp. 528-529.
@article{e44d6ba1606e433c9c6907daa0f31e1f,
title = "Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal: Experience in 32 patients",
abstract = "A Food and Drug Administration approved protocol using a microsurgical carbon dioxide laser to assist in vasectomy reversal was instituted in January 1987. Between January 1987 and December 1988 the procedure was performed on 32 patients, 31 of whom submitted sperm and were available to evaluate. Success rates for sperm in the ejaculate in patients who underwent vasectomy less than 10 years previously were excellent, approaching 95{\%}. The pregnancy rate in this group was 35{\%}. In patients whose vasectomy was performed more than 10 years before reversal the results were much poorer. The success rate for sperm in the ejaculate was only 36{\%} and the pregnancy rate was only 9{\%}. The advantage of laser-assisted vasectomy reversal is that it is a simpler technical procedure that requires considerably less time than a 2-layer microsurgical technique. There were no significant complications, sperm granuloma, or even significant swelling or hematoma in any patient operated upon. Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal is at least equal to conventional microsurgical techniques and definitely easier to perform surgically.",
author = "A. Shanberg and L. Tansey and R. Baghdassarian and D. Sawyer and Lynne, {Charles M}",
year = "1990",
month = "4",
day = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "143",
pages = "528--529",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal

T2 - Experience in 32 patients

AU - Shanberg, A.

AU - Tansey, L.

AU - Baghdassarian, R.

AU - Sawyer, D.

AU - Lynne, Charles M

PY - 1990/4/3

Y1 - 1990/4/3

N2 - A Food and Drug Administration approved protocol using a microsurgical carbon dioxide laser to assist in vasectomy reversal was instituted in January 1987. Between January 1987 and December 1988 the procedure was performed on 32 patients, 31 of whom submitted sperm and were available to evaluate. Success rates for sperm in the ejaculate in patients who underwent vasectomy less than 10 years previously were excellent, approaching 95%. The pregnancy rate in this group was 35%. In patients whose vasectomy was performed more than 10 years before reversal the results were much poorer. The success rate for sperm in the ejaculate was only 36% and the pregnancy rate was only 9%. The advantage of laser-assisted vasectomy reversal is that it is a simpler technical procedure that requires considerably less time than a 2-layer microsurgical technique. There were no significant complications, sperm granuloma, or even significant swelling or hematoma in any patient operated upon. Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal is at least equal to conventional microsurgical techniques and definitely easier to perform surgically.

AB - A Food and Drug Administration approved protocol using a microsurgical carbon dioxide laser to assist in vasectomy reversal was instituted in January 1987. Between January 1987 and December 1988 the procedure was performed on 32 patients, 31 of whom submitted sperm and were available to evaluate. Success rates for sperm in the ejaculate in patients who underwent vasectomy less than 10 years previously were excellent, approaching 95%. The pregnancy rate in this group was 35%. In patients whose vasectomy was performed more than 10 years before reversal the results were much poorer. The success rate for sperm in the ejaculate was only 36% and the pregnancy rate was only 9%. The advantage of laser-assisted vasectomy reversal is that it is a simpler technical procedure that requires considerably less time than a 2-layer microsurgical technique. There were no significant complications, sperm granuloma, or even significant swelling or hematoma in any patient operated upon. Laser-assisted vasectomy reversal is at least equal to conventional microsurgical techniques and definitely easier to perform surgically.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025307539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025307539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 143

SP - 528

EP - 529

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 3

ER -