Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension: A minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse

Carlos Medina, Peter Takacs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: To assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension and describe the surgical technique. Design: Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: University tertiary medical center. Patients: Twenty-three patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse and desire for uterine preservation who underwent surgical repair. Intervention: Laparoscopic uterine uterosacral uterine suspension. Measurements: Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were completed. The stage of pelvic organ prolapse was assessed using the ICS pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination. Descriptive statistics and paired t testing were used for statistical analysis. Results: Nineteen of 23 patients (82.6%) had preoperative prolapse stage 2 or greater. Nine patients (40.9%) had uterine prolapse beyond the hymen. After operation there were significant improvements in the stage of prolapse (2 vs 0, p < .01). The POP-Q scores for point C and D were significantly further away from the hymen after operation than compared with the preoperative values (-0.6 vs -7.8, and -5.0 vs -8.6; p < .01) respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. The estimated blood loss (mean ± SD) was 111.5 ± 139.4 mL. The hospital stay (mean ± SD) was 2.2 ± 1.7 days. None of the patients had symptomatic prolapse during the mean follow-up of 15.9 months. Conclusion: Laparoscopic uterine suspension appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for uterine prolapse in patients who desire uterine preservation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)472-475
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2006

Fingerprint

Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Suspensions
Uterine Prolapse
Prolapse
Hymen
Intraoperative Complications
Advisory Committees
Length of Stay

Keywords

  • Endometrial ablation
  • Menorrhagia
  • Myomas
  • NovaSure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension : A minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse. / Medina, Carlos; Takacs, Peter.

In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Vol. 13, No. 5, 01.09.2006, p. 472-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cadd3d07e95a4bc385a23538bb22739a,
title = "Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension: A minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse",
abstract = "Study Objective: To assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension and describe the surgical technique. Design: Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: University tertiary medical center. Patients: Twenty-three patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse and desire for uterine preservation who underwent surgical repair. Intervention: Laparoscopic uterine uterosacral uterine suspension. Measurements: Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were completed. The stage of pelvic organ prolapse was assessed using the ICS pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination. Descriptive statistics and paired t testing were used for statistical analysis. Results: Nineteen of 23 patients (82.6{\%}) had preoperative prolapse stage 2 or greater. Nine patients (40.9{\%}) had uterine prolapse beyond the hymen. After operation there were significant improvements in the stage of prolapse (2 vs 0, p < .01). The POP-Q scores for point C and D were significantly further away from the hymen after operation than compared with the preoperative values (-0.6 vs -7.8, and -5.0 vs -8.6; p < .01) respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. The estimated blood loss (mean ± SD) was 111.5 ± 139.4 mL. The hospital stay (mean ± SD) was 2.2 ± 1.7 days. None of the patients had symptomatic prolapse during the mean follow-up of 15.9 months. Conclusion: Laparoscopic uterine suspension appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for uterine prolapse in patients who desire uterine preservation.",
keywords = "Endometrial ablation, Menorrhagia, Myomas, NovaSure",
author = "Carlos Medina and Peter Takacs",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmig.2006.04.009",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "472--475",
journal = "Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology",
issn = "1553-4650",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension

T2 - A minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse

AU - Medina, Carlos

AU - Takacs, Peter

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - Study Objective: To assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension and describe the surgical technique. Design: Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: University tertiary medical center. Patients: Twenty-three patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse and desire for uterine preservation who underwent surgical repair. Intervention: Laparoscopic uterine uterosacral uterine suspension. Measurements: Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were completed. The stage of pelvic organ prolapse was assessed using the ICS pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination. Descriptive statistics and paired t testing were used for statistical analysis. Results: Nineteen of 23 patients (82.6%) had preoperative prolapse stage 2 or greater. Nine patients (40.9%) had uterine prolapse beyond the hymen. After operation there were significant improvements in the stage of prolapse (2 vs 0, p < .01). The POP-Q scores for point C and D were significantly further away from the hymen after operation than compared with the preoperative values (-0.6 vs -7.8, and -5.0 vs -8.6; p < .01) respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. The estimated blood loss (mean ± SD) was 111.5 ± 139.4 mL. The hospital stay (mean ± SD) was 2.2 ± 1.7 days. None of the patients had symptomatic prolapse during the mean follow-up of 15.9 months. Conclusion: Laparoscopic uterine suspension appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for uterine prolapse in patients who desire uterine preservation.

AB - Study Objective: To assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension and describe the surgical technique. Design: Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: University tertiary medical center. Patients: Twenty-three patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse and desire for uterine preservation who underwent surgical repair. Intervention: Laparoscopic uterine uterosacral uterine suspension. Measurements: Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were completed. The stage of pelvic organ prolapse was assessed using the ICS pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination. Descriptive statistics and paired t testing were used for statistical analysis. Results: Nineteen of 23 patients (82.6%) had preoperative prolapse stage 2 or greater. Nine patients (40.9%) had uterine prolapse beyond the hymen. After operation there were significant improvements in the stage of prolapse (2 vs 0, p < .01). The POP-Q scores for point C and D were significantly further away from the hymen after operation than compared with the preoperative values (-0.6 vs -7.8, and -5.0 vs -8.6; p < .01) respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. The estimated blood loss (mean ± SD) was 111.5 ± 139.4 mL. The hospital stay (mean ± SD) was 2.2 ± 1.7 days. None of the patients had symptomatic prolapse during the mean follow-up of 15.9 months. Conclusion: Laparoscopic uterine suspension appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for uterine prolapse in patients who desire uterine preservation.

KW - Endometrial ablation

KW - Menorrhagia

KW - Myomas

KW - NovaSure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748195027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748195027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.04.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.04.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 16962535

AN - SCOPUS:33748195027

VL - 13

SP - 472

EP - 475

JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

SN - 1553-4650

IS - 5

ER -