Lagrangian data in a high-resolution numerical simulation of the North Atlantic I. Comparison with in situ drifter data

Zulema D. Garraffo, Arthur J Mariano, Annalisa Griffa, Carmela Veneziani, Eric P. Chassignet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A model/data comparison was performed between simulated drifters from a high-resolution numerical simulation of the North Atlantic and a data set from in situ surface drifters. The comparison makes use of pseudo-Eulerian statistics such as mean velocity and eddy kinetic energy, and Lagrangian statistics such as integral time scales. The space and time distribution of the two data sets differ in the sense that the in situ drifters were released inhomogeneously in space and time while the simulated drifters were homogeneously seeded at the same time over a regular 1° grid. Despite this difference, the total data distributions computed over the complete data sets show some similarities that are mostly related to the large-scale pattern of Ekman divergence/convergence. Comparisons of eddy kinetic energy and root mean square velocity indicate that the numerical model underestimates the eddy kinetic energy in the Gulf Stream extension and in the ocean interior. In addition, the model Lagrangian time scales are longer in the interior than the in situ time scales by approximately a factor of 2. It is suggested that this is primarily due to the lack of high-frequency winds in the model forcing, which causes an underestimation of the directly forced eddy variability. Regarding the mean flow, the comparison has been performed both qualitatively and quantitatively using James' statistical test. The results indicate that over most of the domain, the differences between model and in situ estimates are not significant. However, some areas of significant differences exist, close to high-energy regions, notably around the Gulf Stream path, which in the model lies slightly north of the observed path, although its strength and structure are well represented overall. Mean currents close to the buffer zones, primarily the Azores Current, also exhibit significant differences between model results and in situ estimates. Possibilities for model improvement are discussed in terms of forcings, buffer zone implementations, turbulence and mixed layer parameterizations, in light of our model/data comparison.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)157-176
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Marine Systems
Volume29
Issue number1-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

drifter
simulation
eddy
kinetic energy
Gulf Stream
buffer zone
timescale
energy
kinetics
space and time
statistics
buffers
comparison
in situ
Azores
mixed layer
strength (mechanics)
parameterization
turbulence
divergence

Keywords

  • Eddy kinetic energy
  • Lagrangian data
  • Mean velocity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Oceanography

Cite this

Lagrangian data in a high-resolution numerical simulation of the North Atlantic I. Comparison with in situ drifter data. / Garraffo, Zulema D.; Mariano, Arthur J; Griffa, Annalisa; Veneziani, Carmela; Chassignet, Eric P.

In: Journal of Marine Systems, Vol. 29, No. 1-4, 2001, p. 157-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Garraffo, Zulema D. ; Mariano, Arthur J ; Griffa, Annalisa ; Veneziani, Carmela ; Chassignet, Eric P. / Lagrangian data in a high-resolution numerical simulation of the North Atlantic I. Comparison with in situ drifter data. In: Journal of Marine Systems. 2001 ; Vol. 29, No. 1-4. pp. 157-176.
@article{452712360c7c4a719009d72a9e5c4908,
title = "Lagrangian data in a high-resolution numerical simulation of the North Atlantic I. Comparison with in situ drifter data",
abstract = "A model/data comparison was performed between simulated drifters from a high-resolution numerical simulation of the North Atlantic and a data set from in situ surface drifters. The comparison makes use of pseudo-Eulerian statistics such as mean velocity and eddy kinetic energy, and Lagrangian statistics such as integral time scales. The space and time distribution of the two data sets differ in the sense that the in situ drifters were released inhomogeneously in space and time while the simulated drifters were homogeneously seeded at the same time over a regular 1° grid. Despite this difference, the total data distributions computed over the complete data sets show some similarities that are mostly related to the large-scale pattern of Ekman divergence/convergence. Comparisons of eddy kinetic energy and root mean square velocity indicate that the numerical model underestimates the eddy kinetic energy in the Gulf Stream extension and in the ocean interior. In addition, the model Lagrangian time scales are longer in the interior than the in situ time scales by approximately a factor of 2. It is suggested that this is primarily due to the lack of high-frequency winds in the model forcing, which causes an underestimation of the directly forced eddy variability. Regarding the mean flow, the comparison has been performed both qualitatively and quantitatively using James' statistical test. The results indicate that over most of the domain, the differences between model and in situ estimates are not significant. However, some areas of significant differences exist, close to high-energy regions, notably around the Gulf Stream path, which in the model lies slightly north of the observed path, although its strength and structure are well represented overall. Mean currents close to the buffer zones, primarily the Azores Current, also exhibit significant differences between model results and in situ estimates. Possibilities for model improvement are discussed in terms of forcings, buffer zone implementations, turbulence and mixed layer parameterizations, in light of our model/data comparison.",
keywords = "Eddy kinetic energy, Lagrangian data, Mean velocity",
author = "Garraffo, {Zulema D.} and Mariano, {Arthur J} and Annalisa Griffa and Carmela Veneziani and Chassignet, {Eric P.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0924-7963(01)00015-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "157--176",
journal = "Journal of Marine Systems",
issn = "0924-7963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lagrangian data in a high-resolution numerical simulation of the North Atlantic I. Comparison with in situ drifter data

AU - Garraffo, Zulema D.

AU - Mariano, Arthur J

AU - Griffa, Annalisa

AU - Veneziani, Carmela

AU - Chassignet, Eric P.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - A model/data comparison was performed between simulated drifters from a high-resolution numerical simulation of the North Atlantic and a data set from in situ surface drifters. The comparison makes use of pseudo-Eulerian statistics such as mean velocity and eddy kinetic energy, and Lagrangian statistics such as integral time scales. The space and time distribution of the two data sets differ in the sense that the in situ drifters were released inhomogeneously in space and time while the simulated drifters were homogeneously seeded at the same time over a regular 1° grid. Despite this difference, the total data distributions computed over the complete data sets show some similarities that are mostly related to the large-scale pattern of Ekman divergence/convergence. Comparisons of eddy kinetic energy and root mean square velocity indicate that the numerical model underestimates the eddy kinetic energy in the Gulf Stream extension and in the ocean interior. In addition, the model Lagrangian time scales are longer in the interior than the in situ time scales by approximately a factor of 2. It is suggested that this is primarily due to the lack of high-frequency winds in the model forcing, which causes an underestimation of the directly forced eddy variability. Regarding the mean flow, the comparison has been performed both qualitatively and quantitatively using James' statistical test. The results indicate that over most of the domain, the differences between model and in situ estimates are not significant. However, some areas of significant differences exist, close to high-energy regions, notably around the Gulf Stream path, which in the model lies slightly north of the observed path, although its strength and structure are well represented overall. Mean currents close to the buffer zones, primarily the Azores Current, also exhibit significant differences between model results and in situ estimates. Possibilities for model improvement are discussed in terms of forcings, buffer zone implementations, turbulence and mixed layer parameterizations, in light of our model/data comparison.

AB - A model/data comparison was performed between simulated drifters from a high-resolution numerical simulation of the North Atlantic and a data set from in situ surface drifters. The comparison makes use of pseudo-Eulerian statistics such as mean velocity and eddy kinetic energy, and Lagrangian statistics such as integral time scales. The space and time distribution of the two data sets differ in the sense that the in situ drifters were released inhomogeneously in space and time while the simulated drifters were homogeneously seeded at the same time over a regular 1° grid. Despite this difference, the total data distributions computed over the complete data sets show some similarities that are mostly related to the large-scale pattern of Ekman divergence/convergence. Comparisons of eddy kinetic energy and root mean square velocity indicate that the numerical model underestimates the eddy kinetic energy in the Gulf Stream extension and in the ocean interior. In addition, the model Lagrangian time scales are longer in the interior than the in situ time scales by approximately a factor of 2. It is suggested that this is primarily due to the lack of high-frequency winds in the model forcing, which causes an underestimation of the directly forced eddy variability. Regarding the mean flow, the comparison has been performed both qualitatively and quantitatively using James' statistical test. The results indicate that over most of the domain, the differences between model and in situ estimates are not significant. However, some areas of significant differences exist, close to high-energy regions, notably around the Gulf Stream path, which in the model lies slightly north of the observed path, although its strength and structure are well represented overall. Mean currents close to the buffer zones, primarily the Azores Current, also exhibit significant differences between model results and in situ estimates. Possibilities for model improvement are discussed in terms of forcings, buffer zone implementations, turbulence and mixed layer parameterizations, in light of our model/data comparison.

KW - Eddy kinetic energy

KW - Lagrangian data

KW - Mean velocity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034951812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034951812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0924-7963(01)00015-X

DO - 10.1016/S0924-7963(01)00015-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034951812

VL - 29

SP - 157

EP - 176

JO - Journal of Marine Systems

JF - Journal of Marine Systems

SN - 0924-7963

IS - 1-4

ER -