Laboratory results in ocular viral diseases: Implications in clinical-laboratory correlation

Fabiana Bogossian Marangon, Darlene Miller, Eduardo Alfonso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To document etiology and predictive value of clinical diagnosis in laboratory confirmed viral diseases. Methods: Reports of culture-positive cases of samples collected from patients presenting from January 1987 - December 2001 were evaluated. Results: One: thousand nine hundred and sixty-four (1964) cultures were submitted during 1987-2001. Twenty-six percent were positive (514). Human herpesvirus 1 was the mostfrequent agent isolated from all positive culture (56%). Adenovirus was the most common virus isolated from conjunctiva (66%), human herpesvirus 1 from lid and cornea (76%, 88%) and cytomegalovirus from vitreous (27%). Some unusual pathogens were recovered from conjunctiva as cytomegalovirus and from cornea as adenovirus, enterovirus and cytomegalovirus. Recognition of common viral syndromes was human herpesvirus 1 (88%), epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (88%), acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (70%) and varicella zoster virus (100%). However, some misdiagnosed cases were observed. Thirteen percent of conjunctivitis thought to be caused by herpes were due to adenovirus, 3.2% to Enterovirus, 3.2% to varicella zoster virus and 3.2% to human cytomegalovirus. Also, 5% of cases with a clinical diagnosis of herpes keratitis were caused by adenovirus and 2.7% by enterovirus. Finally, 4.8% of cases thought to be adenovirus conjunctivitis were herpes conjunctivitis. Conclusions: Human herpesvirus 1 remains the most frequently isolated virus from ocular sites in general (56%). Nonherpetic corneal isolates were in decreasing order: adenovirus, enterovirus and cytomegalovirus. Clinical and laboratory correlation was less than 90%. The most misdiagnosed cases were herpes conjunctivitis and keratitis, some cases of adenovirus conjunctivitis some cases of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis. It is essential that a rapid and specific diagnosis is offered under atypical viral presentation for the institution of specific antiviral therapy and to avoid complications that can be a result of misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Also it is important to do viral testing in order to confirm clinical diagnosis, report emerging infections, resistance and change in the epidemiology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-194
Number of pages6
JournalArquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
Volume70
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Keywords

  • Eye infections
  • Herpetic/diagnosis
  • Keratitis
  • Polymerase chain reaction
  • Sensitivity and specificity
  • Simplexvirus/isolation & purification
  • Viral/diagnosis
  • Viral/etiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Laboratory results in ocular viral diseases: Implications in clinical-laboratory correlation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this