Knowledge, Acceptance, and Inductive Logic

Jaakko Hintikka; Risto Hilpinen

doi:10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71660-4

Knowledge, Acceptance, and Inductive Logic

Jaakko Hintikka, Risto Hilpinen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1-20
Number of pages	20
Journal	Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics
Volume	43
Issue number	C
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71660-4
State	Published - 1966
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Logic

Access to Document

10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71660-4

Cite this

@article{5d6c8bb4a2594bd7adf3659d2f744e9d,

title = "Knowledge, Acceptance, and Inductive Logic",

author = "Jaakko Hintikka and Risto Hilpinen",

note = "Funding Information: 21 This does not of course imply that there are no important differences between the concept of knowledge defined by means of (D2), (D.Ac) and (D.Ac.sing) and the Aristotelian conception of knowledge. 22 For systems of inductive logic based on rules of acceptance, see e.g. Kemeny [1953] and Putnam [1963]. 23 This study has been supported by a grant from the Finnish State Council for Humanities iValtion humanistinen toimikunta). The contribution of the seniorauthor has been facilitated by a Finnish State Fellowship (Va/tion apuraha varttuneille tieteenharjoittajillei. The work has been carried out independently by the junior author on the basis of suggestions from the senior author.",

year = "1966",

doi = "10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71660-4",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "43",

pages = "1--20",

journal = "Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics",

issn = "0049-237X",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "C",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge, Acceptance, and Inductive Logic

AU - Hintikka, Jaakko

AU - Hilpinen, Risto

N1 - Funding Information: 21 This does not of course imply that there are no important differences between the concept of knowledge defined by means of (D2), (D.Ac) and (D.Ac.sing) and the Aristotelian conception of knowledge. 22 For systems of inductive logic based on rules of acceptance, see e.g. Kemeny [1953] and Putnam [1963]. 23 This study has been supported by a grant from the Finnish State Council for Humanities iValtion humanistinen toimikunta). The contribution of the seniorauthor has been facilitated by a Finnish State Fellowship (Va/tion apuraha varttuneille tieteenharjoittajillei. The work has been carried out independently by the junior author on the basis of suggestions from the senior author.

PY - 1966

Y1 - 1966

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957667502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957667502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71660-4

DO - 10.1016/S0049-237X(08)71660-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77957667502

VL - 43

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics

JF - Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics

SN - 0049-237X

IS - C

ER -

Knowledge, Acceptance, and Inductive Logic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this