Jun, Fos and Krox in the hippocampus after noxious stimulation

Simultaneous-input-dependent expression and nuclear speckling

Damien D Pearse, Asim Mirza, John Leah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stimulation of sensory C-fibres produces extensive expression of the Fos, Jun and Krox families of inducible transcription factors (ITFs) in many nociceptive CNS areas [28]. In the hippocampus, however, c-Fos is only weakly induced by such stimulation, and expression of the other ITFs has not been studied. Here we examine the effects of single, repeated and simultaneous C-fibre inputs on ITF expressions in the rat hippocampus. A brief, strong electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve C-fibres induced little or no expression of c-Fos or Krox-20. In contrast, FosB was induced and continued to rise in all areas, whereas the basal expressions of c-Jun and Krox-24 were initially reduced but then returned during the subsequent 36 h. A weak noxious cutaneous stimulus applied to one hindpaw induced only weak expressions of the ITFs. However, if the sciatic stimulation was applied contralaterally and 6 h beforehand, this weak stimulus strongly induced Krox-24, but not other ITFs, i.e. there was a potentiation of Krox-24 expression. When these two stimuli were applied simultaneously a few c-Fos labelled cells did appear, and there was and an increased Krox-24 expression. There was also a strong potentiation of FosB and a strong reduction in c-Jun expression. This simultaneous stimulation was the only type of stimulation to induce expression of Krox-20. Also after simultaneous stimulation the majority of the nuclear labelling for FosB, but not of the other ITFs, had a speckled appearance. MK-801 blocked these changes in ITF expressions, but it could also cause the C-fibre stimulations to induce c-Fos and c-Jun in specific areas of the hippocampus. Thus C-fibre stimulation does affect transcription factor activity in the hippocampus; and the strong responses of some ITFs to simultaneous inputs points to their having a role as 'genetic coincidence detectors' in the hippocampus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-208
Number of pages16
JournalBrain Research
Volume894
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 16 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hippocampus
Transcription Factors
Unmyelinated Nerve Fibers
Dizocilpine Maleate
Sciatic Nerve
Nerve Fibers
Electric Stimulation
Skin

Keywords

  • C-fiber
  • Fos
  • Hippocampus
  • Jun
  • Krox
  • Noxious
  • Nuclear speckling
  • Potentiation
  • Transcription factor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Jun, Fos and Krox in the hippocampus after noxious stimulation : Simultaneous-input-dependent expression and nuclear speckling. / Pearse, Damien D; Mirza, Asim; Leah, John.

In: Brain Research, Vol. 894, No. 2, 16.03.2001, p. 193-208.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77c0ed6b197a48a7a7c7c98c06e97880,
title = "Jun, Fos and Krox in the hippocampus after noxious stimulation: Simultaneous-input-dependent expression and nuclear speckling",
abstract = "Stimulation of sensory C-fibres produces extensive expression of the Fos, Jun and Krox families of inducible transcription factors (ITFs) in many nociceptive CNS areas [28]. In the hippocampus, however, c-Fos is only weakly induced by such stimulation, and expression of the other ITFs has not been studied. Here we examine the effects of single, repeated and simultaneous C-fibre inputs on ITF expressions in the rat hippocampus. A brief, strong electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve C-fibres induced little or no expression of c-Fos or Krox-20. In contrast, FosB was induced and continued to rise in all areas, whereas the basal expressions of c-Jun and Krox-24 were initially reduced but then returned during the subsequent 36 h. A weak noxious cutaneous stimulus applied to one hindpaw induced only weak expressions of the ITFs. However, if the sciatic stimulation was applied contralaterally and 6 h beforehand, this weak stimulus strongly induced Krox-24, but not other ITFs, i.e. there was a potentiation of Krox-24 expression. When these two stimuli were applied simultaneously a few c-Fos labelled cells did appear, and there was and an increased Krox-24 expression. There was also a strong potentiation of FosB and a strong reduction in c-Jun expression. This simultaneous stimulation was the only type of stimulation to induce expression of Krox-20. Also after simultaneous stimulation the majority of the nuclear labelling for FosB, but not of the other ITFs, had a speckled appearance. MK-801 blocked these changes in ITF expressions, but it could also cause the C-fibre stimulations to induce c-Fos and c-Jun in specific areas of the hippocampus. Thus C-fibre stimulation does affect transcription factor activity in the hippocampus; and the strong responses of some ITFs to simultaneous inputs points to their having a role as 'genetic coincidence detectors' in the hippocampus.",
keywords = "C-fiber, Fos, Hippocampus, Jun, Krox, Noxious, Nuclear speckling, Potentiation, Transcription factor",
author = "Pearse, {Damien D} and Asim Mirza and John Leah",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/S0006-8993(01)01993-X",
language = "English",
volume = "894",
pages = "193--208",
journal = "Brain Research",
issn = "0006-8993",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jun, Fos and Krox in the hippocampus after noxious stimulation

T2 - Simultaneous-input-dependent expression and nuclear speckling

AU - Pearse, Damien D

AU - Mirza, Asim

AU - Leah, John

PY - 2001/3/16

Y1 - 2001/3/16

N2 - Stimulation of sensory C-fibres produces extensive expression of the Fos, Jun and Krox families of inducible transcription factors (ITFs) in many nociceptive CNS areas [28]. In the hippocampus, however, c-Fos is only weakly induced by such stimulation, and expression of the other ITFs has not been studied. Here we examine the effects of single, repeated and simultaneous C-fibre inputs on ITF expressions in the rat hippocampus. A brief, strong electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve C-fibres induced little or no expression of c-Fos or Krox-20. In contrast, FosB was induced and continued to rise in all areas, whereas the basal expressions of c-Jun and Krox-24 were initially reduced but then returned during the subsequent 36 h. A weak noxious cutaneous stimulus applied to one hindpaw induced only weak expressions of the ITFs. However, if the sciatic stimulation was applied contralaterally and 6 h beforehand, this weak stimulus strongly induced Krox-24, but not other ITFs, i.e. there was a potentiation of Krox-24 expression. When these two stimuli were applied simultaneously a few c-Fos labelled cells did appear, and there was and an increased Krox-24 expression. There was also a strong potentiation of FosB and a strong reduction in c-Jun expression. This simultaneous stimulation was the only type of stimulation to induce expression of Krox-20. Also after simultaneous stimulation the majority of the nuclear labelling for FosB, but not of the other ITFs, had a speckled appearance. MK-801 blocked these changes in ITF expressions, but it could also cause the C-fibre stimulations to induce c-Fos and c-Jun in specific areas of the hippocampus. Thus C-fibre stimulation does affect transcription factor activity in the hippocampus; and the strong responses of some ITFs to simultaneous inputs points to their having a role as 'genetic coincidence detectors' in the hippocampus.

AB - Stimulation of sensory C-fibres produces extensive expression of the Fos, Jun and Krox families of inducible transcription factors (ITFs) in many nociceptive CNS areas [28]. In the hippocampus, however, c-Fos is only weakly induced by such stimulation, and expression of the other ITFs has not been studied. Here we examine the effects of single, repeated and simultaneous C-fibre inputs on ITF expressions in the rat hippocampus. A brief, strong electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve C-fibres induced little or no expression of c-Fos or Krox-20. In contrast, FosB was induced and continued to rise in all areas, whereas the basal expressions of c-Jun and Krox-24 were initially reduced but then returned during the subsequent 36 h. A weak noxious cutaneous stimulus applied to one hindpaw induced only weak expressions of the ITFs. However, if the sciatic stimulation was applied contralaterally and 6 h beforehand, this weak stimulus strongly induced Krox-24, but not other ITFs, i.e. there was a potentiation of Krox-24 expression. When these two stimuli were applied simultaneously a few c-Fos labelled cells did appear, and there was and an increased Krox-24 expression. There was also a strong potentiation of FosB and a strong reduction in c-Jun expression. This simultaneous stimulation was the only type of stimulation to induce expression of Krox-20. Also after simultaneous stimulation the majority of the nuclear labelling for FosB, but not of the other ITFs, had a speckled appearance. MK-801 blocked these changes in ITF expressions, but it could also cause the C-fibre stimulations to induce c-Fos and c-Jun in specific areas of the hippocampus. Thus C-fibre stimulation does affect transcription factor activity in the hippocampus; and the strong responses of some ITFs to simultaneous inputs points to their having a role as 'genetic coincidence detectors' in the hippocampus.

KW - C-fiber

KW - Fos

KW - Hippocampus

KW - Jun

KW - Krox

KW - Noxious

KW - Nuclear speckling

KW - Potentiation

KW - Transcription factor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035896446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035896446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)01993-X

DO - 10.1016/S0006-8993(01)01993-X

M3 - Article

VL - 894

SP - 193

EP - 208

JO - Brain Research

JF - Brain Research

SN - 0006-8993

IS - 2

ER -