"It's my body": Does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict?

Heidemarie Kremer, Gail Ironson, Neil Schneiderman, Martin Hautzinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. This study explores how much people with HIV/AIDS wanted and how much they actually perceived being involved in the decision to take or not to take antiretroviral treatment (ART). The congruence between desired and perceived decisional involvement was also related to decisional conflict. Method. Cross-sectional (N = 79), the Control Preferences Scale assessed patients' preferred versus perceived role in treatment decision making. The Decisional Conflict Scale measured patients' perceived difficulties in decision making. Results. Although a minority of patients (32%) perceived their role as shared decision making, the majority (59%) preferred shared decision making. Some did not desire shared decision making, with 28% preferring to decide on their own versus 13% wanting their physicians to decide for them. Overall, 58% did not feel they had achieved their desired role in decision making (half of whom perceived more control and the other half less control than preferred). Participants declining ART felt more pressure to decide alone compared with those taking ART (P < 0.01). Decisional conflict was expressed by 53% and was highest when physicians unilaterally made decisions about ART for patients who preferred shared decision making (P < 0.001). Conclusions. In this study, most physicians do not meet their patients' desired roles in decision making. One-third of people taking ART feel less involved than they desire. More critically, half of those declining ART feel pressured to decide alone, suggesting that physicians should remain involved in the decision to reject treatment, as this requires careful monitoring and periodical revisiting. Because lack of shared decision making is related to decisional conflict, physicians may reduce decisional conflict by meeting patients' desires for shared decision making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)522-532
Number of pages11
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2007

Fingerprint

Patient Participation
Decision Making
Physicians
Therapeutics
Conflict (Psychology)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
HIV

Keywords

  • Antiretroviral treatment
  • Decision making
  • Decisional conflict
  • HIV/AIDS
  • Patient involvement
  • Patient-physician relationship

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

"It's my body" : Does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict? / Kremer, Heidemarie; Ironson, Gail; Schneiderman, Neil; Hautzinger, Martin.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 27, No. 5, 01.09.2007, p. 522-532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{264ddb03977a45cabf27953da55d5d55,
title = "{"}It's my body{"}: Does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict?",
abstract = "Objective. This study explores how much people with HIV/AIDS wanted and how much they actually perceived being involved in the decision to take or not to take antiretroviral treatment (ART). The congruence between desired and perceived decisional involvement was also related to decisional conflict. Method. Cross-sectional (N = 79), the Control Preferences Scale assessed patients' preferred versus perceived role in treatment decision making. The Decisional Conflict Scale measured patients' perceived difficulties in decision making. Results. Although a minority of patients (32{\%}) perceived their role as shared decision making, the majority (59{\%}) preferred shared decision making. Some did not desire shared decision making, with 28{\%} preferring to decide on their own versus 13{\%} wanting their physicians to decide for them. Overall, 58{\%} did not feel they had achieved their desired role in decision making (half of whom perceived more control and the other half less control than preferred). Participants declining ART felt more pressure to decide alone compared with those taking ART (P < 0.01). Decisional conflict was expressed by 53{\%} and was highest when physicians unilaterally made decisions about ART for patients who preferred shared decision making (P < 0.001). Conclusions. In this study, most physicians do not meet their patients' desired roles in decision making. One-third of people taking ART feel less involved than they desire. More critically, half of those declining ART feel pressured to decide alone, suggesting that physicians should remain involved in the decision to reject treatment, as this requires careful monitoring and periodical revisiting. Because lack of shared decision making is related to decisional conflict, physicians may reduce decisional conflict by meeting patients' desires for shared decision making.",
keywords = "Antiretroviral treatment, Decision making, Decisional conflict, HIV/AIDS, Patient involvement, Patient-physician relationship",
author = "Heidemarie Kremer and Gail Ironson and Neil Schneiderman and Martin Hautzinger",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X07306782",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "522--532",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "It's my body"

T2 - Does patient involvement in decision making reduce decisional conflict?

AU - Kremer, Heidemarie

AU - Ironson, Gail

AU - Schneiderman, Neil

AU - Hautzinger, Martin

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - Objective. This study explores how much people with HIV/AIDS wanted and how much they actually perceived being involved in the decision to take or not to take antiretroviral treatment (ART). The congruence between desired and perceived decisional involvement was also related to decisional conflict. Method. Cross-sectional (N = 79), the Control Preferences Scale assessed patients' preferred versus perceived role in treatment decision making. The Decisional Conflict Scale measured patients' perceived difficulties in decision making. Results. Although a minority of patients (32%) perceived their role as shared decision making, the majority (59%) preferred shared decision making. Some did not desire shared decision making, with 28% preferring to decide on their own versus 13% wanting their physicians to decide for them. Overall, 58% did not feel they had achieved their desired role in decision making (half of whom perceived more control and the other half less control than preferred). Participants declining ART felt more pressure to decide alone compared with those taking ART (P < 0.01). Decisional conflict was expressed by 53% and was highest when physicians unilaterally made decisions about ART for patients who preferred shared decision making (P < 0.001). Conclusions. In this study, most physicians do not meet their patients' desired roles in decision making. One-third of people taking ART feel less involved than they desire. More critically, half of those declining ART feel pressured to decide alone, suggesting that physicians should remain involved in the decision to reject treatment, as this requires careful monitoring and periodical revisiting. Because lack of shared decision making is related to decisional conflict, physicians may reduce decisional conflict by meeting patients' desires for shared decision making.

AB - Objective. This study explores how much people with HIV/AIDS wanted and how much they actually perceived being involved in the decision to take or not to take antiretroviral treatment (ART). The congruence between desired and perceived decisional involvement was also related to decisional conflict. Method. Cross-sectional (N = 79), the Control Preferences Scale assessed patients' preferred versus perceived role in treatment decision making. The Decisional Conflict Scale measured patients' perceived difficulties in decision making. Results. Although a minority of patients (32%) perceived their role as shared decision making, the majority (59%) preferred shared decision making. Some did not desire shared decision making, with 28% preferring to decide on their own versus 13% wanting their physicians to decide for them. Overall, 58% did not feel they had achieved their desired role in decision making (half of whom perceived more control and the other half less control than preferred). Participants declining ART felt more pressure to decide alone compared with those taking ART (P < 0.01). Decisional conflict was expressed by 53% and was highest when physicians unilaterally made decisions about ART for patients who preferred shared decision making (P < 0.001). Conclusions. In this study, most physicians do not meet their patients' desired roles in decision making. One-third of people taking ART feel less involved than they desire. More critically, half of those declining ART feel pressured to decide alone, suggesting that physicians should remain involved in the decision to reject treatment, as this requires careful monitoring and periodical revisiting. Because lack of shared decision making is related to decisional conflict, physicians may reduce decisional conflict by meeting patients' desires for shared decision making.

KW - Antiretroviral treatment

KW - Decision making

KW - Decisional conflict

KW - HIV/AIDS

KW - Patient involvement

KW - Patient-physician relationship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35148840027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35148840027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X07306782

DO - 10.1177/0272989X07306782

M3 - Article

C2 - 17873261

AN - SCOPUS:35148840027

VL - 27

SP - 522

EP - 532

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 5

ER -