It's in our nature: Verbal aggressiveness as temperamental expression

Michael Beatty, James C. McCroskey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past ten years, a substantial body of research focusing on verbal aggressiveness has accumulated. One major observation emerging from this literature is that some people are more disposed toward aggressive symbolic action than are others. Despite this considerable research effort, why individuals vary in their predispositions toward aggressive communication in interpersonal contexts is not well understood. Current speculation about the origin of verbally aggressive predispositions reflects a long standing paradigm which assigns importance to various learning processes. However, communication scholars have ignored the work of psychobiologists that strongly points to inborn neurobiological bases for human behavior and a trivial impact of environment. In this essay, we propose a theory of verbal aggressiveness supported by the work of psychobiologists as articulated in the temperament literature. We contend that verbal aggressiveness represents expressions of inborn, biological functioning, which is antecedent to social experience and, therefore, independent of social learning processes. In formulating our position, we (1) delineate a metatheoretic rationale for a temperament-based model of verbal aggressiveness, (2) integrate neurologically-based temperament functions into an explanation of research findings regarding verbal aggression, (3) present a working model of verbal aggression, and (4) discuss the implications of our theoretical position.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)446-460
Number of pages15
JournalCommunication Quarterly
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

aggressiveness
aggression
learning process
Communication
communication
social learning
speculation
social process
paradigm
experience
literature

Keywords

  • Communibiology
  • Genetics
  • Temperment
  • Traits
  • Verbal aggression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

It's in our nature : Verbal aggressiveness as temperamental expression. / Beatty, Michael; McCroskey, James C.

In: Communication Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, 01.01.1997, p. 446-460.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1be0cf86e07a45058734cd167ff20ad4,
title = "It's in our nature: Verbal aggressiveness as temperamental expression",
abstract = "Over the past ten years, a substantial body of research focusing on verbal aggressiveness has accumulated. One major observation emerging from this literature is that some people are more disposed toward aggressive symbolic action than are others. Despite this considerable research effort, why individuals vary in their predispositions toward aggressive communication in interpersonal contexts is not well understood. Current speculation about the origin of verbally aggressive predispositions reflects a long standing paradigm which assigns importance to various learning processes. However, communication scholars have ignored the work of psychobiologists that strongly points to inborn neurobiological bases for human behavior and a trivial impact of environment. In this essay, we propose a theory of verbal aggressiveness supported by the work of psychobiologists as articulated in the temperament literature. We contend that verbal aggressiveness represents expressions of inborn, biological functioning, which is antecedent to social experience and, therefore, independent of social learning processes. In formulating our position, we (1) delineate a metatheoretic rationale for a temperament-based model of verbal aggressiveness, (2) integrate neurologically-based temperament functions into an explanation of research findings regarding verbal aggression, (3) present a working model of verbal aggression, and (4) discuss the implications of our theoretical position.",
keywords = "Communibiology, Genetics, Temperment, Traits, Verbal aggression",
author = "Michael Beatty and McCroskey, {James C.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01463379709370076",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "446--460",
journal = "Communication Quarterly",
issn = "0146-3373",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It's in our nature

T2 - Verbal aggressiveness as temperamental expression

AU - Beatty, Michael

AU - McCroskey, James C.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Over the past ten years, a substantial body of research focusing on verbal aggressiveness has accumulated. One major observation emerging from this literature is that some people are more disposed toward aggressive symbolic action than are others. Despite this considerable research effort, why individuals vary in their predispositions toward aggressive communication in interpersonal contexts is not well understood. Current speculation about the origin of verbally aggressive predispositions reflects a long standing paradigm which assigns importance to various learning processes. However, communication scholars have ignored the work of psychobiologists that strongly points to inborn neurobiological bases for human behavior and a trivial impact of environment. In this essay, we propose a theory of verbal aggressiveness supported by the work of psychobiologists as articulated in the temperament literature. We contend that verbal aggressiveness represents expressions of inborn, biological functioning, which is antecedent to social experience and, therefore, independent of social learning processes. In formulating our position, we (1) delineate a metatheoretic rationale for a temperament-based model of verbal aggressiveness, (2) integrate neurologically-based temperament functions into an explanation of research findings regarding verbal aggression, (3) present a working model of verbal aggression, and (4) discuss the implications of our theoretical position.

AB - Over the past ten years, a substantial body of research focusing on verbal aggressiveness has accumulated. One major observation emerging from this literature is that some people are more disposed toward aggressive symbolic action than are others. Despite this considerable research effort, why individuals vary in their predispositions toward aggressive communication in interpersonal contexts is not well understood. Current speculation about the origin of verbally aggressive predispositions reflects a long standing paradigm which assigns importance to various learning processes. However, communication scholars have ignored the work of psychobiologists that strongly points to inborn neurobiological bases for human behavior and a trivial impact of environment. In this essay, we propose a theory of verbal aggressiveness supported by the work of psychobiologists as articulated in the temperament literature. We contend that verbal aggressiveness represents expressions of inborn, biological functioning, which is antecedent to social experience and, therefore, independent of social learning processes. In formulating our position, we (1) delineate a metatheoretic rationale for a temperament-based model of verbal aggressiveness, (2) integrate neurologically-based temperament functions into an explanation of research findings regarding verbal aggression, (3) present a working model of verbal aggression, and (4) discuss the implications of our theoretical position.

KW - Communibiology

KW - Genetics

KW - Temperment

KW - Traits

KW - Verbal aggression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000408133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000408133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01463379709370076

DO - 10.1080/01463379709370076

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000408133

VL - 45

SP - 446

EP - 460

JO - Communication Quarterly

JF - Communication Quarterly

SN - 0146-3373

IS - 4

ER -