Item presentaton as an influence on questionnaire validity: A field experiment

Chester Schriesheim, Angelo S. Denisi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was concerned with the effects of questionnaire format on convergent and discriminant validity. Two types of formats were examined: the first with items measuring the same dimensions grouped together and the second with items measuring the same dimensions distributed randomly throughout the questionnaire. Sixty subjects completed questionnaires containing items from the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (Stogdill, 1963) and the Michigan Four-Factor Leadership Questionnaire (Taylor and Bowers, 1972); there were thirty subjects in each of the conditions (grouped and random). The random relative to the grouped condition showed superior convergent and discriminant validity, as assessed by both multitrait-multimethod and analysis of variance procedures. Implications for questionnaire validity are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-182
Number of pages8
JournalEducational and Psychological Measurement
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1980
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Field Experiment
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Questionnaire
questionnaire
experiment
Experiments
Discriminant
Leadership
Analysis of variance
analysis of variance
Influence
Surveys and Questionnaires
Analysis of Variance
leadership
leader

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Education

Cite this

Item presentaton as an influence on questionnaire validity : A field experiment. / Schriesheim, Chester; Denisi, Angelo S.

In: Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 40, No. 1, 1980, p. 175-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d5b8994572a74fe6ad6b012a86cdeba9,
title = "Item presentaton as an influence on questionnaire validity: A field experiment",
abstract = "This study was concerned with the effects of questionnaire format on convergent and discriminant validity. Two types of formats were examined: the first with items measuring the same dimensions grouped together and the second with items measuring the same dimensions distributed randomly throughout the questionnaire. Sixty subjects completed questionnaires containing items from the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (Stogdill, 1963) and the Michigan Four-Factor Leadership Questionnaire (Taylor and Bowers, 1972); there were thirty subjects in each of the conditions (grouped and random). The random relative to the grouped condition showed superior convergent and discriminant validity, as assessed by both multitrait-multimethod and analysis of variance procedures. Implications for questionnaire validity are discussed.",
author = "Chester Schriesheim and Denisi, {Angelo S.}",
year = "1980",
doi = "10.1177/001316448004000130",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "175--182",
journal = "Educational and Psychological Measurement",
issn = "0013-1644",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Item presentaton as an influence on questionnaire validity

T2 - A field experiment

AU - Schriesheim, Chester

AU - Denisi, Angelo S.

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

N2 - This study was concerned with the effects of questionnaire format on convergent and discriminant validity. Two types of formats were examined: the first with items measuring the same dimensions grouped together and the second with items measuring the same dimensions distributed randomly throughout the questionnaire. Sixty subjects completed questionnaires containing items from the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (Stogdill, 1963) and the Michigan Four-Factor Leadership Questionnaire (Taylor and Bowers, 1972); there were thirty subjects in each of the conditions (grouped and random). The random relative to the grouped condition showed superior convergent and discriminant validity, as assessed by both multitrait-multimethod and analysis of variance procedures. Implications for questionnaire validity are discussed.

AB - This study was concerned with the effects of questionnaire format on convergent and discriminant validity. Two types of formats were examined: the first with items measuring the same dimensions grouped together and the second with items measuring the same dimensions distributed randomly throughout the questionnaire. Sixty subjects completed questionnaires containing items from the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (Stogdill, 1963) and the Michigan Four-Factor Leadership Questionnaire (Taylor and Bowers, 1972); there were thirty subjects in each of the conditions (grouped and random). The random relative to the grouped condition showed superior convergent and discriminant validity, as assessed by both multitrait-multimethod and analysis of variance procedures. Implications for questionnaire validity are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965931131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965931131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001316448004000130

DO - 10.1177/001316448004000130

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84965931131

VL - 40

SP - 175

EP - 182

JO - Educational and Psychological Measurement

JF - Educational and Psychological Measurement

SN - 0013-1644

IS - 1

ER -