Isometric cervical extension strength of recreational and experienced cyclists.

Kevin Jacobs, J. Nichols, B. Holmes, M. Buono

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effect for cyclists of the typical forward sitting position on neck strength and its possible relationship to neck pain have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to measure the peak isometric cervical extension strength (PICES) of both recreational and experienced road cyclists and to compare these values to those of noncyclists. Subjects, 45 men between the ages of 18 and 40, were tested for voluntary PICES through a 126 degrees range of motion on a MedX cervical extension machine. No significant differences were found between the three groups in PICES at any angle. When expressed relative to body weight, significant differences in PICES were found at 126 degrees between the control group and the recreational cyclist group (p < 0.05), and between the control group and the experienced cyclist group (p < 0.01), but not at any other angle. Furthermore, no significant differences in strength were found between cyclists experiencing neck pain and those who did not. These data indicate that the cervical muscles of cyclists have not adapted by increasing maximal isometric strength above that of noncyclists, and that the neck pain frequently reported may be due to fatigue from sustained muscular contractions associated with time spent cycling, rather than from muscle weakness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)230-239
Number of pages10
JournalCanadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee
Volume20
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neck Pain
Control Groups
Muscle Weakness
Muscle Contraction
Articular Range of Motion
Posture
Fatigue
Neck
Body Weight
Muscles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Isometric cervical extension strength of recreational and experienced cyclists. / Jacobs, Kevin; Nichols, J.; Holmes, B.; Buono, M.

In: Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.06.1995, p. 230-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1890b3050eb541b5bfa6eb92ec19dfa0,
title = "Isometric cervical extension strength of recreational and experienced cyclists.",
abstract = "The effect for cyclists of the typical forward sitting position on neck strength and its possible relationship to neck pain have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to measure the peak isometric cervical extension strength (PICES) of both recreational and experienced road cyclists and to compare these values to those of noncyclists. Subjects, 45 men between the ages of 18 and 40, were tested for voluntary PICES through a 126 degrees range of motion on a MedX cervical extension machine. No significant differences were found between the three groups in PICES at any angle. When expressed relative to body weight, significant differences in PICES were found at 126 degrees between the control group and the recreational cyclist group (p < 0.05), and between the control group and the experienced cyclist group (p < 0.01), but not at any other angle. Furthermore, no significant differences in strength were found between cyclists experiencing neck pain and those who did not. These data indicate that the cervical muscles of cyclists have not adapted by increasing maximal isometric strength above that of noncyclists, and that the neck pain frequently reported may be due to fatigue from sustained muscular contractions associated with time spent cycling, rather than from muscle weakness.",
author = "Kevin Jacobs and J. Nichols and B. Holmes and M. Buono",
year = "1995",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "230--239",
journal = "Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism",
issn = "1715-5312",
publisher = "National Research Council of Canada",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Isometric cervical extension strength of recreational and experienced cyclists.

AU - Jacobs, Kevin

AU - Nichols, J.

AU - Holmes, B.

AU - Buono, M.

PY - 1995/6/1

Y1 - 1995/6/1

N2 - The effect for cyclists of the typical forward sitting position on neck strength and its possible relationship to neck pain have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to measure the peak isometric cervical extension strength (PICES) of both recreational and experienced road cyclists and to compare these values to those of noncyclists. Subjects, 45 men between the ages of 18 and 40, were tested for voluntary PICES through a 126 degrees range of motion on a MedX cervical extension machine. No significant differences were found between the three groups in PICES at any angle. When expressed relative to body weight, significant differences in PICES were found at 126 degrees between the control group and the recreational cyclist group (p < 0.05), and between the control group and the experienced cyclist group (p < 0.01), but not at any other angle. Furthermore, no significant differences in strength were found between cyclists experiencing neck pain and those who did not. These data indicate that the cervical muscles of cyclists have not adapted by increasing maximal isometric strength above that of noncyclists, and that the neck pain frequently reported may be due to fatigue from sustained muscular contractions associated with time spent cycling, rather than from muscle weakness.

AB - The effect for cyclists of the typical forward sitting position on neck strength and its possible relationship to neck pain have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to measure the peak isometric cervical extension strength (PICES) of both recreational and experienced road cyclists and to compare these values to those of noncyclists. Subjects, 45 men between the ages of 18 and 40, were tested for voluntary PICES through a 126 degrees range of motion on a MedX cervical extension machine. No significant differences were found between the three groups in PICES at any angle. When expressed relative to body weight, significant differences in PICES were found at 126 degrees between the control group and the recreational cyclist group (p < 0.05), and between the control group and the experienced cyclist group (p < 0.01), but not at any other angle. Furthermore, no significant differences in strength were found between cyclists experiencing neck pain and those who did not. These data indicate that the cervical muscles of cyclists have not adapted by increasing maximal isometric strength above that of noncyclists, and that the neck pain frequently reported may be due to fatigue from sustained muscular contractions associated with time spent cycling, rather than from muscle weakness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029319690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029319690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7640649

AN - SCOPUS:0029319690

VL - 20

SP - 230

EP - 239

JO - Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism

JF - Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism

SN - 1715-5312

IS - 2

ER -