Is There Significant Correlation between Self-Reported Low Back Pain Visual Analogue Scores and Low Back Pain Scores Determined by Pressure Pain Induction Matching?

David A Fishbain, John E Lewis, Jinrun Gao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether self-reported visual analogue scale (VAS) low back pain (LBP) scores are valid against matched psychophysically induced pressure pain scores. Two hundred thirty-six chronic LBP patients (some with neck pain) reported their LBP and neck pain scores on a VAS immediately before psychophysical pressure pain induction used to determine pain threshold (PTHRE), pain tolerance (PTOL), and a psychophysical pressure pain score which matched (PMAT) their current LBP. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients were calculated between reported VAS neck scores, reported VAS LBP scores, and the psychophysically determined LBP PMAT scores. The PMAT scores were calculated utilizing PTOL only and both PTOL and PTHRE. There was a significant correlation between the LBP PMAT scores and the reported LBP VAS scores for both types of psychophysical LBP PMAT score calculations; however, there were insignificant correlations between the LBP PMAT scores and reported neck VAS scores. Chronic LBP patients can match their self-reported VAS LBP scores to psychophysically determined LBP PMAT scores. As such, self-reported VAS chronic LBP scores appear to be valid against one type of psychophysical measurement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)358-363
Number of pages6
JournalPain Practice
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Pressure
Pain
Visual Analog Scale
Pain Threshold
Neck Pain
Neck

Keywords

  • Chronic low back pain
  • Pain matching score
  • Pain measurement
  • Pain threshold
  • Pain tolerance
  • Pressure pain induction
  • Visual analogue scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Is There Significant Correlation between Self-Reported Low Back Pain Visual Analogue Scores and Low Back Pain Scores Determined by Pressure Pain Induction Matching? / Fishbain, David A; Lewis, John E; Gao, Jinrun.

In: Pain Practice, Vol. 13, No. 5, 01.06.2013, p. 358-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5470c819f3a74df4b66c126605c3bb1b,
title = "Is There Significant Correlation between Self-Reported Low Back Pain Visual Analogue Scores and Low Back Pain Scores Determined by Pressure Pain Induction Matching?",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to determine whether self-reported visual analogue scale (VAS) low back pain (LBP) scores are valid against matched psychophysically induced pressure pain scores. Two hundred thirty-six chronic LBP patients (some with neck pain) reported their LBP and neck pain scores on a VAS immediately before psychophysical pressure pain induction used to determine pain threshold (PTHRE), pain tolerance (PTOL), and a psychophysical pressure pain score which matched (PMAT) their current LBP. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients were calculated between reported VAS neck scores, reported VAS LBP scores, and the psychophysically determined LBP PMAT scores. The PMAT scores were calculated utilizing PTOL only and both PTOL and PTHRE. There was a significant correlation between the LBP PMAT scores and the reported LBP VAS scores for both types of psychophysical LBP PMAT score calculations; however, there were insignificant correlations between the LBP PMAT scores and reported neck VAS scores. Chronic LBP patients can match their self-reported VAS LBP scores to psychophysically determined LBP PMAT scores. As such, self-reported VAS chronic LBP scores appear to be valid against one type of psychophysical measurement.",
keywords = "Chronic low back pain, Pain matching score, Pain measurement, Pain threshold, Pain tolerance, Pressure pain induction, Visual analogue scale",
author = "Fishbain, {David A} and Lewis, {John E} and Jinrun Gao",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/papr.12001",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "358--363",
journal = "Pain Practice",
issn = "1530-7085",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is There Significant Correlation between Self-Reported Low Back Pain Visual Analogue Scores and Low Back Pain Scores Determined by Pressure Pain Induction Matching?

AU - Fishbain, David A

AU - Lewis, John E

AU - Gao, Jinrun

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - The objective of this study was to determine whether self-reported visual analogue scale (VAS) low back pain (LBP) scores are valid against matched psychophysically induced pressure pain scores. Two hundred thirty-six chronic LBP patients (some with neck pain) reported their LBP and neck pain scores on a VAS immediately before psychophysical pressure pain induction used to determine pain threshold (PTHRE), pain tolerance (PTOL), and a psychophysical pressure pain score which matched (PMAT) their current LBP. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients were calculated between reported VAS neck scores, reported VAS LBP scores, and the psychophysically determined LBP PMAT scores. The PMAT scores were calculated utilizing PTOL only and both PTOL and PTHRE. There was a significant correlation between the LBP PMAT scores and the reported LBP VAS scores for both types of psychophysical LBP PMAT score calculations; however, there were insignificant correlations between the LBP PMAT scores and reported neck VAS scores. Chronic LBP patients can match their self-reported VAS LBP scores to psychophysically determined LBP PMAT scores. As such, self-reported VAS chronic LBP scores appear to be valid against one type of psychophysical measurement.

AB - The objective of this study was to determine whether self-reported visual analogue scale (VAS) low back pain (LBP) scores are valid against matched psychophysically induced pressure pain scores. Two hundred thirty-six chronic LBP patients (some with neck pain) reported their LBP and neck pain scores on a VAS immediately before psychophysical pressure pain induction used to determine pain threshold (PTHRE), pain tolerance (PTOL), and a psychophysical pressure pain score which matched (PMAT) their current LBP. Pearson Product-Moment correlation coefficients were calculated between reported VAS neck scores, reported VAS LBP scores, and the psychophysically determined LBP PMAT scores. The PMAT scores were calculated utilizing PTOL only and both PTOL and PTHRE. There was a significant correlation between the LBP PMAT scores and the reported LBP VAS scores for both types of psychophysical LBP PMAT score calculations; however, there were insignificant correlations between the LBP PMAT scores and reported neck VAS scores. Chronic LBP patients can match their self-reported VAS LBP scores to psychophysically determined LBP PMAT scores. As such, self-reported VAS chronic LBP scores appear to be valid against one type of psychophysical measurement.

KW - Chronic low back pain

KW - Pain matching score

KW - Pain measurement

KW - Pain threshold

KW - Pain tolerance

KW - Pressure pain induction

KW - Visual analogue scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878809101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878809101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/papr.12001

DO - 10.1111/papr.12001

M3 - Article

C2 - 23113951

AN - SCOPUS:84878809101

VL - 13

SP - 358

EP - 363

JO - Pain Practice

JF - Pain Practice

SN - 1530-7085

IS - 5

ER -