IS THERE MORE TO COUNTING THAN WHAT MEETS THE EYE? COMMENT ON SNYDER AND RICE

Joianne L. Shortz, Everett L. Worthington, Michael McCullough, Taro Kurusu, Helen De Vries, Wanda Bryant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Snhyder and Rice (1994) comment that Shortz, Worthington, McCullough, DeVries, and Morrow (1994) failed to use sophisticated methods in their identification of prolific authors, institutions, and journals within the field of mari‐tal therapy. This article is a response to Snyder and rice. We argue that Snyder and Rice's suggested methods emphasize a different research question that ouroriginal question, We investigated productivity of authous and institutions, not im‐pact of scholars on the fiels of marital therapy. furthermore, we demonstrate that the results obtained from Snyder and Rice's suggested methodologies are nor appreciably different from our original results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-202
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Marital and Family Therapy
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Marital Therapy
productivity
methodology
Oryza
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

IS THERE MORE TO COUNTING THAN WHAT MEETS THE EYE? COMMENT ON SNYDER AND RICE. / Shortz, Joianne L.; Worthington, Everett L.; McCullough, Michael; Kurusu, Taro; De Vries, Helen; Bryant, Wanda.

In: Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1994, p. 197-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shortz, Joianne L. ; Worthington, Everett L. ; McCullough, Michael ; Kurusu, Taro ; De Vries, Helen ; Bryant, Wanda. / IS THERE MORE TO COUNTING THAN WHAT MEETS THE EYE? COMMENT ON SNYDER AND RICE. In: Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1994 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 197-202.
@article{9dfe17cfa26d44548696a64eaa078d0c,
title = "IS THERE MORE TO COUNTING THAN WHAT MEETS THE EYE? COMMENT ON SNYDER AND RICE",
abstract = "Snhyder and Rice (1994) comment that Shortz, Worthington, McCullough, DeVries, and Morrow (1994) failed to use sophisticated methods in their identification of prolific authors, institutions, and journals within the field of mari‐tal therapy. This article is a response to Snyder and rice. We argue that Snyder and Rice's suggested methods emphasize a different research question that ouroriginal question, We investigated productivity of authous and institutions, not im‐pact of scholars on the fiels of marital therapy. furthermore, we demonstrate that the results obtained from Snyder and Rice's suggested methodologies are nor appreciably different from our original results.",
author = "Shortz, {Joianne L.} and Worthington, {Everett L.} and Michael McCullough and Taro Kurusu and {De Vries}, Helen and Wanda Bryant",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1111/j.1752-0606.1994.tb01028.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "197--202",
journal = "Journal of Marital and Family Therapy",
issn = "0194-472X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - IS THERE MORE TO COUNTING THAN WHAT MEETS THE EYE? COMMENT ON SNYDER AND RICE

AU - Shortz, Joianne L.

AU - Worthington, Everett L.

AU - McCullough, Michael

AU - Kurusu, Taro

AU - De Vries, Helen

AU - Bryant, Wanda

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Snhyder and Rice (1994) comment that Shortz, Worthington, McCullough, DeVries, and Morrow (1994) failed to use sophisticated methods in their identification of prolific authors, institutions, and journals within the field of mari‐tal therapy. This article is a response to Snyder and rice. We argue that Snyder and Rice's suggested methods emphasize a different research question that ouroriginal question, We investigated productivity of authous and institutions, not im‐pact of scholars on the fiels of marital therapy. furthermore, we demonstrate that the results obtained from Snyder and Rice's suggested methodologies are nor appreciably different from our original results.

AB - Snhyder and Rice (1994) comment that Shortz, Worthington, McCullough, DeVries, and Morrow (1994) failed to use sophisticated methods in their identification of prolific authors, institutions, and journals within the field of mari‐tal therapy. This article is a response to Snyder and rice. We argue that Snyder and Rice's suggested methods emphasize a different research question that ouroriginal question, We investigated productivity of authous and institutions, not im‐pact of scholars on the fiels of marital therapy. furthermore, we demonstrate that the results obtained from Snyder and Rice's suggested methodologies are nor appreciably different from our original results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986703990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986703990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1994.tb01028.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1994.tb01028.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84986703990

VL - 20

SP - 197

EP - 202

JO - Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

JF - Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

SN - 0194-472X

IS - 2

ER -