Is there a role for digital rectal examination in the followup of patients after radical prostatectomy?

Can Öbek, Endre Neulander, Samih Sadek, Mark S. Soloway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: We determine the role of digital rectal examination in the followup of patients after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data on 501 consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1992 and 1998, and were followed at the University of Miami. Patients were evaluated at 3 to 6-month intervals after surgery with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination. Biochemical recurrence was defined as PSA greater than 0.2 ng./ml. and increasing on at least 2 consecutive measurements. Local recurrence, detected by an abnormal digital rectal examination, was defined as an induration or nodularity in the prostatic fossa. Results: Mean followup plus or minus standard deviation was 25.4 ± 20.8 months. Disease recurred in 72 patients (14.4%) and was biochemical in all. An abnormal digital rectal examination was noted in 4 patients, none of whom had an undetectable PSA at the time of a palpable abnormality. Conclusions: Our results suggest that an abnormal digital rectal examination after radical prostatectomy is always associated with a detectable PSA, which implies that performing a digital rectal examination in the absence of a detectable PSA may not be necessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)762-764
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume162
Issue number3 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1999

Keywords

  • Prostate
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic neoplasms
  • Rectum
  • Recurrence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is there a role for digital rectal examination in the followup of patients after radical prostatectomy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this