Is Postoperative Function After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Influenced by Preoperative Functional Levels?

Carlos Lavernia, Michele D'Apuzzo, Mark D. Rossi, David J Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate functional outcomes after surgery in a subgroup of patients presenting for hip and knee surgery who had low functional scores before surgery. One hundred twenty-seven unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty patients were assessed preoperatively and 3 consecutive years after arthroplasty using: Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the Quality of Well-Being index scales. Patients were placed into 2 groups based on preoperative WOMAC function scores; 51 points or more, worse functioning group, and less than 51 points, higher functioning group. Regardless of time, the worse functioning group in both procedures performed worse on the Quality of Well-Being index, SF-36 (function score), SF-36 (social score), and WOMAC total and pain scores (P ≤ .0001). The greatest change (range, 2%-638%) for all variables in both groups for both procedures occurred during the first year. Patients that had severe/extreme functional impairment had worse 3-year outcomes compared with patients getting surgery when their functional levels were better.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1033-1043
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2009

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Hip
Ontario
Osteoarthritis
Arthroplasty
Knee
Pain

Keywords

  • functional outcomes
  • impairment
  • knee arthroplasty
  • osteoarthritis
  • surgical timing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Is Postoperative Function After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Influenced by Preoperative Functional Levels? / Lavernia, Carlos; D'Apuzzo, Michele; Rossi, Mark D.; Lee, David J.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 24, No. 7, 01.10.2009, p. 1033-1043.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lavernia, Carlos ; D'Apuzzo, Michele ; Rossi, Mark D. ; Lee, David J. / Is Postoperative Function After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Influenced by Preoperative Functional Levels?. In: Journal of Arthroplasty. 2009 ; Vol. 24, No. 7. pp. 1033-1043.
@article{2be0fb23b1cb44279fe1799cca57bf2e,
title = "Is Postoperative Function After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Influenced by Preoperative Functional Levels?",
abstract = "Our objective was to evaluate functional outcomes after surgery in a subgroup of patients presenting for hip and knee surgery who had low functional scores before surgery. One hundred twenty-seven unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty patients were assessed preoperatively and 3 consecutive years after arthroplasty using: Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the Quality of Well-Being index scales. Patients were placed into 2 groups based on preoperative WOMAC function scores; 51 points or more, worse functioning group, and less than 51 points, higher functioning group. Regardless of time, the worse functioning group in both procedures performed worse on the Quality of Well-Being index, SF-36 (function score), SF-36 (social score), and WOMAC total and pain scores (P ≤ .0001). The greatest change (range, 2{\%}-638{\%}) for all variables in both groups for both procedures occurred during the first year. Patients that had severe/extreme functional impairment had worse 3-year outcomes compared with patients getting surgery when their functional levels were better.",
keywords = "functional outcomes, impairment, knee arthroplasty, osteoarthritis, surgical timing",
author = "Carlos Lavernia and Michele D'Apuzzo and Rossi, {Mark D.} and Lee, {David J}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.010",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1033--1043",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Postoperative Function After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Influenced by Preoperative Functional Levels?

AU - Lavernia, Carlos

AU - D'Apuzzo, Michele

AU - Rossi, Mark D.

AU - Lee, David J

PY - 2009/10/1

Y1 - 2009/10/1

N2 - Our objective was to evaluate functional outcomes after surgery in a subgroup of patients presenting for hip and knee surgery who had low functional scores before surgery. One hundred twenty-seven unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty patients were assessed preoperatively and 3 consecutive years after arthroplasty using: Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the Quality of Well-Being index scales. Patients were placed into 2 groups based on preoperative WOMAC function scores; 51 points or more, worse functioning group, and less than 51 points, higher functioning group. Regardless of time, the worse functioning group in both procedures performed worse on the Quality of Well-Being index, SF-36 (function score), SF-36 (social score), and WOMAC total and pain scores (P ≤ .0001). The greatest change (range, 2%-638%) for all variables in both groups for both procedures occurred during the first year. Patients that had severe/extreme functional impairment had worse 3-year outcomes compared with patients getting surgery when their functional levels were better.

AB - Our objective was to evaluate functional outcomes after surgery in a subgroup of patients presenting for hip and knee surgery who had low functional scores before surgery. One hundred twenty-seven unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty patients were assessed preoperatively and 3 consecutive years after arthroplasty using: Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the Quality of Well-Being index scales. Patients were placed into 2 groups based on preoperative WOMAC function scores; 51 points or more, worse functioning group, and less than 51 points, higher functioning group. Regardless of time, the worse functioning group in both procedures performed worse on the Quality of Well-Being index, SF-36 (function score), SF-36 (social score), and WOMAC total and pain scores (P ≤ .0001). The greatest change (range, 2%-638%) for all variables in both groups for both procedures occurred during the first year. Patients that had severe/extreme functional impairment had worse 3-year outcomes compared with patients getting surgery when their functional levels were better.

KW - functional outcomes

KW - impairment

KW - knee arthroplasty

KW - osteoarthritis

KW - surgical timing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349241984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349241984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.010

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 18963759

AN - SCOPUS:70349241984

VL - 24

SP - 1033

EP - 1043

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 7

ER -