Abstract
A moderator subgroup study, originally published by Schriesheim and Murphy (1976), is reexamined using the within-group agreement coefficient (rwg; James, Demaree & Wolf, 1984), moderated raw-score multiple linear regression, and moderated within- and between-entity analysis (WABA; Dansereau, Alutto & Yammarino, 1984; Schriesheim, forthcoming). The results show serious discrepancies in results between the subgroup and regression approaches, the need to exercise care in interpreting the rwg and raw-score regression results, and the necessity of conducting WABA and supplemental within-entity WABA moderation analyses to gain meaningful insight into the phenomena being investigated. Implications and future directions for leadership theory and research are considered.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 111-145 |
| Number of pages | 35 |
| Journal | Leadership Quarterly |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1995 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Applied Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
Cite this
Is it "trustworthy"? A multiple-levels-of-analysis reexamination of an ohio state leadership study, with implications for future research. / Schriesheim, Chester; Cogliser, Claudia C.; Neider, Linda.
In: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1995, p. 111-145.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Is it "trustworthy"? A multiple-levels-of-analysis reexamination of an ohio state leadership study, with implications for future research
AU - Schriesheim, Chester
AU - Cogliser, Claudia C.
AU - Neider, Linda
PY - 1995
Y1 - 1995
N2 - A moderator subgroup study, originally published by Schriesheim and Murphy (1976), is reexamined using the within-group agreement coefficient (rwg; James, Demaree & Wolf, 1984), moderated raw-score multiple linear regression, and moderated within- and between-entity analysis (WABA; Dansereau, Alutto & Yammarino, 1984; Schriesheim, forthcoming). The results show serious discrepancies in results between the subgroup and regression approaches, the need to exercise care in interpreting the rwg and raw-score regression results, and the necessity of conducting WABA and supplemental within-entity WABA moderation analyses to gain meaningful insight into the phenomena being investigated. Implications and future directions for leadership theory and research are considered.
AB - A moderator subgroup study, originally published by Schriesheim and Murphy (1976), is reexamined using the within-group agreement coefficient (rwg; James, Demaree & Wolf, 1984), moderated raw-score multiple linear regression, and moderated within- and between-entity analysis (WABA; Dansereau, Alutto & Yammarino, 1984; Schriesheim, forthcoming). The results show serious discrepancies in results between the subgroup and regression approaches, the need to exercise care in interpreting the rwg and raw-score regression results, and the necessity of conducting WABA and supplemental within-entity WABA moderation analyses to gain meaningful insight into the phenomena being investigated. Implications and future directions for leadership theory and research are considered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000794783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000794783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90031-4
DO - 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90031-4
M3 - Article
VL - 6
SP - 111
EP - 145
JO - Leadership Quarterly
JF - Leadership Quarterly
SN - 1048-9843
IS - 2
ER -