Is it necessary to drain all postoperative fluid collections after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis?

Hannah G. Piper, Betul Derinkuyu, Korgun Koral, Eduardo Perez, Joseph T. Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Children treated for perforated appendicitis can have significant morbidity. Management often includes looking for and draining postoperative fluid collections. We sought to determine if drainage hastens recovery. Methods: Children with perforated appendicitis treated with appendectomy from 2006 to 2009 were reviewed. Patients with postoperative fluid that was drained were compared with patients with undrained fluid with regard to preoperative features and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analyses included paired Student's t tests, Mann-Whitney U test, and linear regression. Results: Five hundred ninety-one patients were reviewed. Seventy-one patients had postoperative fluid, of whom 36 had a drainage procedure and 35 did not. There was no significant difference in white blood cell count at the time of assessment for drainage (16.4 ± 4.0 vs 14.6 ± 4.9, P = .14), days with fever (3.5 ± 3.0 vs 2.9 ± 2.5, P = .35), or readmission rate (19% vs 31%, P = .28). After multivariate linear regression, larger fluid volumes were associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) (P = .03). For fluid collections between 30-100 mL, there was no significant difference in LOS between the drain and no-drain groups (9.8 ± 3.5 vs 10.9 ± 5.2 days, P = .51). Conclusion: After appendectomy for perforated appendicitis, larger postoperative fluid collections are associated with prolonged LOS. Drainage of collections less than 100 mL may not hasten recovery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1126-1130
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Appendectomy
Appendicitis
Drainage
Length of Stay
Linear Models
Nonparametric Statistics
Leukocyte Count
Fever
Students
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Percutaneous drainage
  • Perforated appendicitis
  • Postoperative fluid

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Is it necessary to drain all postoperative fluid collections after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis? / Piper, Hannah G.; Derinkuyu, Betul; Koral, Korgun; Perez, Eduardo; Murphy, Joseph T.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 46, No. 6, 01.06.2011, p. 1126-1130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Piper, Hannah G. ; Derinkuyu, Betul ; Koral, Korgun ; Perez, Eduardo ; Murphy, Joseph T. / Is it necessary to drain all postoperative fluid collections after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis?. In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 46, No. 6. pp. 1126-1130.
@article{f399d61bd7c14f65bc5f93987613c52c,
title = "Is it necessary to drain all postoperative fluid collections after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis?",
abstract = "Purpose: Children treated for perforated appendicitis can have significant morbidity. Management often includes looking for and draining postoperative fluid collections. We sought to determine if drainage hastens recovery. Methods: Children with perforated appendicitis treated with appendectomy from 2006 to 2009 were reviewed. Patients with postoperative fluid that was drained were compared with patients with undrained fluid with regard to preoperative features and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analyses included paired Student's t tests, Mann-Whitney U test, and linear regression. Results: Five hundred ninety-one patients were reviewed. Seventy-one patients had postoperative fluid, of whom 36 had a drainage procedure and 35 did not. There was no significant difference in white blood cell count at the time of assessment for drainage (16.4 ± 4.0 vs 14.6 ± 4.9, P = .14), days with fever (3.5 ± 3.0 vs 2.9 ± 2.5, P = .35), or readmission rate (19{\%} vs 31{\%}, P = .28). After multivariate linear regression, larger fluid volumes were associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) (P = .03). For fluid collections between 30-100 mL, there was no significant difference in LOS between the drain and no-drain groups (9.8 ± 3.5 vs 10.9 ± 5.2 days, P = .51). Conclusion: After appendectomy for perforated appendicitis, larger postoperative fluid collections are associated with prolonged LOS. Drainage of collections less than 100 mL may not hasten recovery.",
keywords = "Percutaneous drainage, Perforated appendicitis, Postoperative fluid",
author = "Piper, {Hannah G.} and Betul Derinkuyu and Korgun Koral and Eduardo Perez and Murphy, {Joseph T.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.043",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "1126--1130",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is it necessary to drain all postoperative fluid collections after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis?

AU - Piper, Hannah G.

AU - Derinkuyu, Betul

AU - Koral, Korgun

AU - Perez, Eduardo

AU - Murphy, Joseph T.

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Purpose: Children treated for perforated appendicitis can have significant morbidity. Management often includes looking for and draining postoperative fluid collections. We sought to determine if drainage hastens recovery. Methods: Children with perforated appendicitis treated with appendectomy from 2006 to 2009 were reviewed. Patients with postoperative fluid that was drained were compared with patients with undrained fluid with regard to preoperative features and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analyses included paired Student's t tests, Mann-Whitney U test, and linear regression. Results: Five hundred ninety-one patients were reviewed. Seventy-one patients had postoperative fluid, of whom 36 had a drainage procedure and 35 did not. There was no significant difference in white blood cell count at the time of assessment for drainage (16.4 ± 4.0 vs 14.6 ± 4.9, P = .14), days with fever (3.5 ± 3.0 vs 2.9 ± 2.5, P = .35), or readmission rate (19% vs 31%, P = .28). After multivariate linear regression, larger fluid volumes were associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) (P = .03). For fluid collections between 30-100 mL, there was no significant difference in LOS between the drain and no-drain groups (9.8 ± 3.5 vs 10.9 ± 5.2 days, P = .51). Conclusion: After appendectomy for perforated appendicitis, larger postoperative fluid collections are associated with prolonged LOS. Drainage of collections less than 100 mL may not hasten recovery.

AB - Purpose: Children treated for perforated appendicitis can have significant morbidity. Management often includes looking for and draining postoperative fluid collections. We sought to determine if drainage hastens recovery. Methods: Children with perforated appendicitis treated with appendectomy from 2006 to 2009 were reviewed. Patients with postoperative fluid that was drained were compared with patients with undrained fluid with regard to preoperative features and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analyses included paired Student's t tests, Mann-Whitney U test, and linear regression. Results: Five hundred ninety-one patients were reviewed. Seventy-one patients had postoperative fluid, of whom 36 had a drainage procedure and 35 did not. There was no significant difference in white blood cell count at the time of assessment for drainage (16.4 ± 4.0 vs 14.6 ± 4.9, P = .14), days with fever (3.5 ± 3.0 vs 2.9 ± 2.5, P = .35), or readmission rate (19% vs 31%, P = .28). After multivariate linear regression, larger fluid volumes were associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) (P = .03). For fluid collections between 30-100 mL, there was no significant difference in LOS between the drain and no-drain groups (9.8 ± 3.5 vs 10.9 ± 5.2 days, P = .51). Conclusion: After appendectomy for perforated appendicitis, larger postoperative fluid collections are associated with prolonged LOS. Drainage of collections less than 100 mL may not hasten recovery.

KW - Percutaneous drainage

KW - Perforated appendicitis

KW - Postoperative fluid

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959303371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959303371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.043

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.043

M3 - Article

C2 - 21683210

AN - SCOPUS:79959303371

VL - 46

SP - 1126

EP - 1130

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 6

ER -