Is Empathy the Default Response to Suffering? A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Perspective Taking’s Effect on Empathic Concern

William H.B. McAuliffe, Evan C. Carter, Juliana Berhane, Alexander C. Snihur, Michael E. McCullough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We conducted a series of meta-analytic tests on experiments in which participants read perspective-taking instructions—that is, written instructions to imagine a distressed persons’ point of view (“imagine-self” and “imagine-other” instructions), or to inhibit such actions (“remain-objective” instructions)—and afterwards reported how much empathic concern they experienced upon learning about the distressed person. If people spontaneously empathize with others, then participants who receive remain-objective instructions should report less empathic concern than do participants in a “no-instructions” control condition; if people can deliberately increase how much empathic concern they experience, then imagine-self and imagine-other instructions should increase empathic concern relative to not receiving any instructions. Random-effects models revealed that remain-objective instructions reduced empathic concern, but “imagine” instructions did not significantly increase it. The results were robust to most corrections for bias. Our conclusions were not qualified by the study characteristics we examined, but most relevant moderators have not yet been thoroughly studied.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Review
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Ego
Learning

Keywords

  • altruism
  • empathy
  • meta-analysis
  • perspective taking
  • publication bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Is Empathy the Default Response to Suffering? A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Perspective Taking’s Effect on Empathic Concern. / McAuliffe, William H.B.; Carter, Evan C.; Berhane, Juliana; Snihur, Alexander C.; McCullough, Michael E.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Review, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c19a1389e0624cacb5fa2801438439d3,
title = "Is Empathy the Default Response to Suffering? A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Perspective Taking’s Effect on Empathic Concern",
abstract = "We conducted a series of meta-analytic tests on experiments in which participants read perspective-taking instructions—that is, written instructions to imagine a distressed persons’ point of view (“imagine-self” and “imagine-other” instructions), or to inhibit such actions (“remain-objective” instructions)—and afterwards reported how much empathic concern they experienced upon learning about the distressed person. If people spontaneously empathize with others, then participants who receive remain-objective instructions should report less empathic concern than do participants in a “no-instructions” control condition; if people can deliberately increase how much empathic concern they experience, then imagine-self and imagine-other instructions should increase empathic concern relative to not receiving any instructions. Random-effects models revealed that remain-objective instructions reduced empathic concern, but “imagine” instructions did not significantly increase it. The results were robust to most corrections for bias. Our conclusions were not qualified by the study characteristics we examined, but most relevant moderators have not yet been thoroughly studied.",
keywords = "altruism, empathy, meta-analysis, perspective taking, publication bias",
author = "McAuliffe, {William H.B.} and Carter, {Evan C.} and Juliana Berhane and Snihur, {Alexander C.} and McCullough, {Michael E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1088868319887599",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Review",
issn = "1088-8683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Empathy the Default Response to Suffering? A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of Perspective Taking’s Effect on Empathic Concern

AU - McAuliffe, William H.B.

AU - Carter, Evan C.

AU - Berhane, Juliana

AU - Snihur, Alexander C.

AU - McCullough, Michael E.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - We conducted a series of meta-analytic tests on experiments in which participants read perspective-taking instructions—that is, written instructions to imagine a distressed persons’ point of view (“imagine-self” and “imagine-other” instructions), or to inhibit such actions (“remain-objective” instructions)—and afterwards reported how much empathic concern they experienced upon learning about the distressed person. If people spontaneously empathize with others, then participants who receive remain-objective instructions should report less empathic concern than do participants in a “no-instructions” control condition; if people can deliberately increase how much empathic concern they experience, then imagine-self and imagine-other instructions should increase empathic concern relative to not receiving any instructions. Random-effects models revealed that remain-objective instructions reduced empathic concern, but “imagine” instructions did not significantly increase it. The results were robust to most corrections for bias. Our conclusions were not qualified by the study characteristics we examined, but most relevant moderators have not yet been thoroughly studied.

AB - We conducted a series of meta-analytic tests on experiments in which participants read perspective-taking instructions—that is, written instructions to imagine a distressed persons’ point of view (“imagine-self” and “imagine-other” instructions), or to inhibit such actions (“remain-objective” instructions)—and afterwards reported how much empathic concern they experienced upon learning about the distressed person. If people spontaneously empathize with others, then participants who receive remain-objective instructions should report less empathic concern than do participants in a “no-instructions” control condition; if people can deliberately increase how much empathic concern they experience, then imagine-self and imagine-other instructions should increase empathic concern relative to not receiving any instructions. Random-effects models revealed that remain-objective instructions reduced empathic concern, but “imagine” instructions did not significantly increase it. The results were robust to most corrections for bias. Our conclusions were not qualified by the study characteristics we examined, but most relevant moderators have not yet been thoroughly studied.

KW - altruism

KW - empathy

KW - meta-analysis

KW - perspective taking

KW - publication bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076023781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076023781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1088868319887599

DO - 10.1177/1088868319887599

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85076023781

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Review

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Review

SN - 1088-8683

ER -