Is another clinical trial warranted regarding endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis?

Seemant Chaturvedi, Alison Halliday

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Several clinical trials regarding carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis have been conducted in the past two decades. These research studies have not resolved the controversy regarding the optimal treatment of patients with this condition. Summary of review: We examine some of the reasons why there is persisting uncertainty regarding the value of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis. These include the sample size of earlier studies, the generalizability of these studies, and the clinical importance of the reported surgical benefits in some studies. We then review the rationale for another, larger clinical trial. Conclusions: The role of endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis remains an unsettled issue. A larger clinical trial may shed light on how to best identify which patients derive clinically significant benefits from prophylactic carotid artery surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-213
Number of pages4
JournalCerebrovascular Diseases
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endarterectomy
Carotid Stenosis
Pathologic Constriction
Carotid Endarterectomy
Clinical Trials
Carotid Arteries
Sample Size
Uncertainty
Research
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Carotid endarterectomy
  • Carotid stenosis
  • Cerebral infarction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Is another clinical trial warranted regarding endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis? / Chaturvedi, Seemant; Halliday, Alison.

In: Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 8, No. 4, 07.1998, p. 210-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8b7d4facc76445cfb1e273f030a037a3,
title = "Is another clinical trial warranted regarding endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis?",
abstract = "Background: Several clinical trials regarding carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis have been conducted in the past two decades. These research studies have not resolved the controversy regarding the optimal treatment of patients with this condition. Summary of review: We examine some of the reasons why there is persisting uncertainty regarding the value of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis. These include the sample size of earlier studies, the generalizability of these studies, and the clinical importance of the reported surgical benefits in some studies. We then review the rationale for another, larger clinical trial. Conclusions: The role of endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis remains an unsettled issue. A larger clinical trial may shed light on how to best identify which patients derive clinically significant benefits from prophylactic carotid artery surgery.",
keywords = "Carotid endarterectomy, Carotid stenosis, Cerebral infarction",
author = "Seemant Chaturvedi and Alison Halliday",
year = "1998",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1159/000015853",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "210--213",
journal = "Cerebrovascular Diseases",
issn = "1015-9770",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is another clinical trial warranted regarding endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis?

AU - Chaturvedi, Seemant

AU - Halliday, Alison

PY - 1998/7

Y1 - 1998/7

N2 - Background: Several clinical trials regarding carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis have been conducted in the past two decades. These research studies have not resolved the controversy regarding the optimal treatment of patients with this condition. Summary of review: We examine some of the reasons why there is persisting uncertainty regarding the value of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis. These include the sample size of earlier studies, the generalizability of these studies, and the clinical importance of the reported surgical benefits in some studies. We then review the rationale for another, larger clinical trial. Conclusions: The role of endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis remains an unsettled issue. A larger clinical trial may shed light on how to best identify which patients derive clinically significant benefits from prophylactic carotid artery surgery.

AB - Background: Several clinical trials regarding carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis have been conducted in the past two decades. These research studies have not resolved the controversy regarding the optimal treatment of patients with this condition. Summary of review: We examine some of the reasons why there is persisting uncertainty regarding the value of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis. These include the sample size of earlier studies, the generalizability of these studies, and the clinical importance of the reported surgical benefits in some studies. We then review the rationale for another, larger clinical trial. Conclusions: The role of endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis remains an unsettled issue. A larger clinical trial may shed light on how to best identify which patients derive clinically significant benefits from prophylactic carotid artery surgery.

KW - Carotid endarterectomy

KW - Carotid stenosis

KW - Cerebral infarction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031858377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031858377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000015853

DO - 10.1159/000015853

M3 - Article

C2 - 9684060

AN - SCOPUS:0031858377

VL - 8

SP - 210

EP - 213

JO - Cerebrovascular Diseases

JF - Cerebrovascular Diseases

SN - 1015-9770

IS - 4

ER -