Is adolescent varicocele a progressive disease process?

David A. Diamond, David Zurakowski, Anthony Atala, Stuart B. Bauer, Joseph G. Borer, Bartley G. Cilento, Harriet Paltiel, Craig A. Peters, Alan B. Retik, Kenneth Glassberg, Yves Homsy, Michelle Clement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We determined whether there was evidence of progression in either varicocele grade or testicular volume differentials over time in our adolescent varicocele population. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 boys 7.3 to 19 years old (mean age 13.7, SD 2.5) were seen at sequential visits. At each visit varicocele grade was determined by the attending urologist and ultrasound calculated testicular volume differential was determined by an attending ultrasonographer. A senior staff statistician performed statistical analysis of the sequential data. Results: The varicocele grade data were analyzed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test and no significant evidence of progression on sequential visits was demonstrated. Similarly, the serial volume differential data were assessed using the paired t test and no significant evidence for progression of testicular volume differentials was demonstrated. Conclusions: In our study population neither varicocele grade nor change in testicular volume differentials increased over time in a statistically significant manner. These results argue against the concept that adolescent varicocele is a progressive disease process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1746-1748
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume172
Issue number4 II
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Varicocele
Statistical Data Interpretation
Population

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Varicocele

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Diamond, D. A., Zurakowski, D., Atala, A., Bauer, S. B., Borer, J. G., Cilento, B. G., ... Clement, M. (2004). Is adolescent varicocele a progressive disease process? Journal of Urology, 172(4 II), 1746-1748. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000138375.49016.62

Is adolescent varicocele a progressive disease process? / Diamond, David A.; Zurakowski, David; Atala, Anthony; Bauer, Stuart B.; Borer, Joseph G.; Cilento, Bartley G.; Paltiel, Harriet; Peters, Craig A.; Retik, Alan B.; Glassberg, Kenneth; Homsy, Yves; Clement, Michelle.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 172, No. 4 II, 01.10.2004, p. 1746-1748.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Diamond, DA, Zurakowski, D, Atala, A, Bauer, SB, Borer, JG, Cilento, BG, Paltiel, H, Peters, CA, Retik, AB, Glassberg, K, Homsy, Y & Clement, M 2004, 'Is adolescent varicocele a progressive disease process?', Journal of Urology, vol. 172, no. 4 II, pp. 1746-1748. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000138375.49016.62
Diamond DA, Zurakowski D, Atala A, Bauer SB, Borer JG, Cilento BG et al. Is adolescent varicocele a progressive disease process? Journal of Urology. 2004 Oct 1;172(4 II):1746-1748. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000138375.49016.62
Diamond, David A. ; Zurakowski, David ; Atala, Anthony ; Bauer, Stuart B. ; Borer, Joseph G. ; Cilento, Bartley G. ; Paltiel, Harriet ; Peters, Craig A. ; Retik, Alan B. ; Glassberg, Kenneth ; Homsy, Yves ; Clement, Michelle. / Is adolescent varicocele a progressive disease process?. In: Journal of Urology. 2004 ; Vol. 172, No. 4 II. pp. 1746-1748.
@article{4c418cbc406248ec9f443105e57fe9c6,
title = "Is adolescent varicocele a progressive disease process?",
abstract = "Purpose: We determined whether there was evidence of progression in either varicocele grade or testicular volume differentials over time in our adolescent varicocele population. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 boys 7.3 to 19 years old (mean age 13.7, SD 2.5) were seen at sequential visits. At each visit varicocele grade was determined by the attending urologist and ultrasound calculated testicular volume differential was determined by an attending ultrasonographer. A senior staff statistician performed statistical analysis of the sequential data. Results: The varicocele grade data were analyzed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test and no significant evidence of progression on sequential visits was demonstrated. Similarly, the serial volume differential data were assessed using the paired t test and no significant evidence for progression of testicular volume differentials was demonstrated. Conclusions: In our study population neither varicocele grade nor change in testicular volume differentials increased over time in a statistically significant manner. These results argue against the concept that adolescent varicocele is a progressive disease process.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Varicocele",
author = "Diamond, {David A.} and David Zurakowski and Anthony Atala and Bauer, {Stuart B.} and Borer, {Joseph G.} and Cilento, {Bartley G.} and Harriet Paltiel and Peters, {Craig A.} and Retik, {Alan B.} and Kenneth Glassberg and Yves Homsy and Michelle Clement",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.ju.0000138375.49016.62",
language = "English",
volume = "172",
pages = "1746--1748",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4 II",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is adolescent varicocele a progressive disease process?

AU - Diamond, David A.

AU - Zurakowski, David

AU - Atala, Anthony

AU - Bauer, Stuart B.

AU - Borer, Joseph G.

AU - Cilento, Bartley G.

AU - Paltiel, Harriet

AU - Peters, Craig A.

AU - Retik, Alan B.

AU - Glassberg, Kenneth

AU - Homsy, Yves

AU - Clement, Michelle

PY - 2004/10/1

Y1 - 2004/10/1

N2 - Purpose: We determined whether there was evidence of progression in either varicocele grade or testicular volume differentials over time in our adolescent varicocele population. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 boys 7.3 to 19 years old (mean age 13.7, SD 2.5) were seen at sequential visits. At each visit varicocele grade was determined by the attending urologist and ultrasound calculated testicular volume differential was determined by an attending ultrasonographer. A senior staff statistician performed statistical analysis of the sequential data. Results: The varicocele grade data were analyzed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test and no significant evidence of progression on sequential visits was demonstrated. Similarly, the serial volume differential data were assessed using the paired t test and no significant evidence for progression of testicular volume differentials was demonstrated. Conclusions: In our study population neither varicocele grade nor change in testicular volume differentials increased over time in a statistically significant manner. These results argue against the concept that adolescent varicocele is a progressive disease process.

AB - Purpose: We determined whether there was evidence of progression in either varicocele grade or testicular volume differentials over time in our adolescent varicocele population. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 boys 7.3 to 19 years old (mean age 13.7, SD 2.5) were seen at sequential visits. At each visit varicocele grade was determined by the attending urologist and ultrasound calculated testicular volume differential was determined by an attending ultrasonographer. A senior staff statistician performed statistical analysis of the sequential data. Results: The varicocele grade data were analyzed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test and no significant evidence of progression on sequential visits was demonstrated. Similarly, the serial volume differential data were assessed using the paired t test and no significant evidence for progression of testicular volume differentials was demonstrated. Conclusions: In our study population neither varicocele grade nor change in testicular volume differentials increased over time in a statistically significant manner. These results argue against the concept that adolescent varicocele is a progressive disease process.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Varicocele

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4544279992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4544279992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ju.0000138375.49016.62

DO - 10.1097/01.ju.0000138375.49016.62

M3 - Article

VL - 172

SP - 1746

EP - 1748

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4 II

ER -