Iowa gambling task performance in euthymic bipolar i disorder

A meta-analysis and empirical study

Michael D. Edge, Sheri L. Johnson, Tommy Ng, Charles S Carver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) has been recommended as an index of reward sensitivity, which is elevated in bipolar disorder. We conducted a meta-analysis of IGT performance in euthymic bipolar I disorder compared with control participants. Findings indicated that people with bipolar disorder make more risky choices than control participants, though the effect is small (g=0.35). It is not clear which of the many processes involved in IGT performance are involved in producing the observed group difference. Methods: Fifty-five euthymic people with bipolar disorder and 39 control participants completed the IGT. The Expectancy Valence Model was used to examine differences in IGT. We also examined whether variation in IGT performance within the bipolar group was related to current mood, illness course, impulsivity, or demographics. Results: Bipolar and control groups did not differ on the total number of risky choices, rate of learning, or any of the parameters of the Expectancy Valence Model. IGT performance in bipolar disorder was not related to any of the examined individual differences. Limitations: It is possible that there are group differences that are too small to detect at our sample size or that are not amenable to study via the Expectancy Valence Model. Conclusions: We were unable to identify group differences on the IGT or correlates of IGT performance within bipolar disorder. Though the IGT may serve as a useful model for decision-making, its structure may make it unsuitable for behavioral assessment of reward sensitivity independent of punishment sensitivity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-122
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume150
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 2013

Fingerprint

Gambling
Task Performance and Analysis
Bipolar Disorder
Meta-Analysis
Reward
Punishment
Impulsive Behavior
Individuality
Sample Size
Decision Making
Demography
Learning
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Bipolar disorder
  • Decision-making
  • Iowa Gambling Task
  • Mania
  • Reward sensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Iowa gambling task performance in euthymic bipolar i disorder : A meta-analysis and empirical study. / Edge, Michael D.; Johnson, Sheri L.; Ng, Tommy; Carver, Charles S.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 150, No. 1, 15.08.2013, p. 115-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{577c200f0ea342f1be106357e6f98781,
title = "Iowa gambling task performance in euthymic bipolar i disorder: A meta-analysis and empirical study",
abstract = "Background: The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) has been recommended as an index of reward sensitivity, which is elevated in bipolar disorder. We conducted a meta-analysis of IGT performance in euthymic bipolar I disorder compared with control participants. Findings indicated that people with bipolar disorder make more risky choices than control participants, though the effect is small (g=0.35). It is not clear which of the many processes involved in IGT performance are involved in producing the observed group difference. Methods: Fifty-five euthymic people with bipolar disorder and 39 control participants completed the IGT. The Expectancy Valence Model was used to examine differences in IGT. We also examined whether variation in IGT performance within the bipolar group was related to current mood, illness course, impulsivity, or demographics. Results: Bipolar and control groups did not differ on the total number of risky choices, rate of learning, or any of the parameters of the Expectancy Valence Model. IGT performance in bipolar disorder was not related to any of the examined individual differences. Limitations: It is possible that there are group differences that are too small to detect at our sample size or that are not amenable to study via the Expectancy Valence Model. Conclusions: We were unable to identify group differences on the IGT or correlates of IGT performance within bipolar disorder. Though the IGT may serve as a useful model for decision-making, its structure may make it unsuitable for behavioral assessment of reward sensitivity independent of punishment sensitivity.",
keywords = "Bipolar disorder, Decision-making, Iowa Gambling Task, Mania, Reward sensitivity",
author = "Edge, {Michael D.} and Johnson, {Sheri L.} and Tommy Ng and Carver, {Charles S}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.027",
language = "English",
volume = "150",
pages = "115--122",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Iowa gambling task performance in euthymic bipolar i disorder

T2 - A meta-analysis and empirical study

AU - Edge, Michael D.

AU - Johnson, Sheri L.

AU - Ng, Tommy

AU - Carver, Charles S

PY - 2013/8/15

Y1 - 2013/8/15

N2 - Background: The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) has been recommended as an index of reward sensitivity, which is elevated in bipolar disorder. We conducted a meta-analysis of IGT performance in euthymic bipolar I disorder compared with control participants. Findings indicated that people with bipolar disorder make more risky choices than control participants, though the effect is small (g=0.35). It is not clear which of the many processes involved in IGT performance are involved in producing the observed group difference. Methods: Fifty-five euthymic people with bipolar disorder and 39 control participants completed the IGT. The Expectancy Valence Model was used to examine differences in IGT. We also examined whether variation in IGT performance within the bipolar group was related to current mood, illness course, impulsivity, or demographics. Results: Bipolar and control groups did not differ on the total number of risky choices, rate of learning, or any of the parameters of the Expectancy Valence Model. IGT performance in bipolar disorder was not related to any of the examined individual differences. Limitations: It is possible that there are group differences that are too small to detect at our sample size or that are not amenable to study via the Expectancy Valence Model. Conclusions: We were unable to identify group differences on the IGT or correlates of IGT performance within bipolar disorder. Though the IGT may serve as a useful model for decision-making, its structure may make it unsuitable for behavioral assessment of reward sensitivity independent of punishment sensitivity.

AB - Background: The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) has been recommended as an index of reward sensitivity, which is elevated in bipolar disorder. We conducted a meta-analysis of IGT performance in euthymic bipolar I disorder compared with control participants. Findings indicated that people with bipolar disorder make more risky choices than control participants, though the effect is small (g=0.35). It is not clear which of the many processes involved in IGT performance are involved in producing the observed group difference. Methods: Fifty-five euthymic people with bipolar disorder and 39 control participants completed the IGT. The Expectancy Valence Model was used to examine differences in IGT. We also examined whether variation in IGT performance within the bipolar group was related to current mood, illness course, impulsivity, or demographics. Results: Bipolar and control groups did not differ on the total number of risky choices, rate of learning, or any of the parameters of the Expectancy Valence Model. IGT performance in bipolar disorder was not related to any of the examined individual differences. Limitations: It is possible that there are group differences that are too small to detect at our sample size or that are not amenable to study via the Expectancy Valence Model. Conclusions: We were unable to identify group differences on the IGT or correlates of IGT performance within bipolar disorder. Though the IGT may serve as a useful model for decision-making, its structure may make it unsuitable for behavioral assessment of reward sensitivity independent of punishment sensitivity.

KW - Bipolar disorder

KW - Decision-making

KW - Iowa Gambling Task

KW - Mania

KW - Reward sensitivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880919506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880919506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.027

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.027

M3 - Article

VL - 150

SP - 115

EP - 122

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

IS - 1

ER -