Investigating variation in the costs and benefits of addiction treatment: Econometric analysis of the Chicago target cities project

Helena J. Salomé, Michael French, Chris Scott, Mark Foss, Michael Dennis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several studies have proposed methods for estimating the economic costs and benefits of addiction treatment. However, little information is available on the client and treatment characteristics that contribute to treatment costs and benefits. This study analyzed a sample of treatment clients from the Chicago Target Cities Project to develop estimation techniques and to determine predictors of treatment cost, benefit, and net benefit. The Chicago Project was a quasi-experimental evaluation study of individuals (N=2,862) in various addiction treatment facilities. The economic analysis component was conducted in two stages. First, previously published methods were employed to estimate cost and benefit during the 6-month follow-up. Subsequently, these measures were used to compute average cost, benefit, net benefit, and the benefit-cost ratio. Second, the distributions of cost, benefit, and net benefit were statistically examined, and empirical models were selected for handling non-normal data. These models were subsequently estimated to identify the predictors of cost, benefit, and net benefit. Results indicate that the average (per client) cost of all treatment services from baseline to follow-up was $1943. The average treatment benefit was $8268, leading to an average net benefit of $6325 and a benefit-cost ratio of 4.26. Furthermore, findings from a robust regression suggest that: (1) age, race, age at first drug use, treatment modality, and some treatment characteristics were significantly related to treatment cost, and (2) education, age at first drug use, some ASI scores, some types of treatment, and resistance to continuing care were related to treatment benefit and net benefit. In conclusion, for the average individual, the net benefit (benefit-cost ratio) of treatment was significantly greater than zero (one). Furthermore, cost and benefit were significantly related to certain client and program characteristics. Future studies may find these empirical models useful when investigating the predictors of the costs and benefits of addiction treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-338
Number of pages14
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2003

Fingerprint

econometrics
addiction
Cost-Benefit Analysis
costs
cost
Health Care Costs
Therapeutics
drug
economic analysis
city
cost-benefit
project
analysis
Addiction
Econometric analysis
Costs and benefits
drug use
Economics
education
estimation procedure

Keywords

  • Addiction treatment
  • Econometric analysis
  • Economic evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Investigating variation in the costs and benefits of addiction treatment : Econometric analysis of the Chicago target cities project. / Salomé, Helena J.; French, Michael; Scott, Chris; Foss, Mark; Dennis, Michael.

In: Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.08.2003, p. 325-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{39bb07571c44480a98b834a30dbe6a64,
title = "Investigating variation in the costs and benefits of addiction treatment: Econometric analysis of the Chicago target cities project",
abstract = "Several studies have proposed methods for estimating the economic costs and benefits of addiction treatment. However, little information is available on the client and treatment characteristics that contribute to treatment costs and benefits. This study analyzed a sample of treatment clients from the Chicago Target Cities Project to develop estimation techniques and to determine predictors of treatment cost, benefit, and net benefit. The Chicago Project was a quasi-experimental evaluation study of individuals (N=2,862) in various addiction treatment facilities. The economic analysis component was conducted in two stages. First, previously published methods were employed to estimate cost and benefit during the 6-month follow-up. Subsequently, these measures were used to compute average cost, benefit, net benefit, and the benefit-cost ratio. Second, the distributions of cost, benefit, and net benefit were statistically examined, and empirical models were selected for handling non-normal data. These models were subsequently estimated to identify the predictors of cost, benefit, and net benefit. Results indicate that the average (per client) cost of all treatment services from baseline to follow-up was $1943. The average treatment benefit was $8268, leading to an average net benefit of $6325 and a benefit-cost ratio of 4.26. Furthermore, findings from a robust regression suggest that: (1) age, race, age at first drug use, treatment modality, and some treatment characteristics were significantly related to treatment cost, and (2) education, age at first drug use, some ASI scores, some types of treatment, and resistance to continuing care were related to treatment benefit and net benefit. In conclusion, for the average individual, the net benefit (benefit-cost ratio) of treatment was significantly greater than zero (one). Furthermore, cost and benefit were significantly related to certain client and program characteristics. Future studies may find these empirical models useful when investigating the predictors of the costs and benefits of addiction treatment.",
keywords = "Addiction treatment, Econometric analysis, Economic evaluation",
author = "Salom{\'e}, {Helena J.} and Michael French and Chris Scott and Mark Foss and Michael Dennis",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00036-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "325--338",
journal = "Evaluation and Program Planning",
issn = "0149-7189",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating variation in the costs and benefits of addiction treatment

T2 - Econometric analysis of the Chicago target cities project

AU - Salomé, Helena J.

AU - French, Michael

AU - Scott, Chris

AU - Foss, Mark

AU - Dennis, Michael

PY - 2003/8/1

Y1 - 2003/8/1

N2 - Several studies have proposed methods for estimating the economic costs and benefits of addiction treatment. However, little information is available on the client and treatment characteristics that contribute to treatment costs and benefits. This study analyzed a sample of treatment clients from the Chicago Target Cities Project to develop estimation techniques and to determine predictors of treatment cost, benefit, and net benefit. The Chicago Project was a quasi-experimental evaluation study of individuals (N=2,862) in various addiction treatment facilities. The economic analysis component was conducted in two stages. First, previously published methods were employed to estimate cost and benefit during the 6-month follow-up. Subsequently, these measures were used to compute average cost, benefit, net benefit, and the benefit-cost ratio. Second, the distributions of cost, benefit, and net benefit were statistically examined, and empirical models were selected for handling non-normal data. These models were subsequently estimated to identify the predictors of cost, benefit, and net benefit. Results indicate that the average (per client) cost of all treatment services from baseline to follow-up was $1943. The average treatment benefit was $8268, leading to an average net benefit of $6325 and a benefit-cost ratio of 4.26. Furthermore, findings from a robust regression suggest that: (1) age, race, age at first drug use, treatment modality, and some treatment characteristics were significantly related to treatment cost, and (2) education, age at first drug use, some ASI scores, some types of treatment, and resistance to continuing care were related to treatment benefit and net benefit. In conclusion, for the average individual, the net benefit (benefit-cost ratio) of treatment was significantly greater than zero (one). Furthermore, cost and benefit were significantly related to certain client and program characteristics. Future studies may find these empirical models useful when investigating the predictors of the costs and benefits of addiction treatment.

AB - Several studies have proposed methods for estimating the economic costs and benefits of addiction treatment. However, little information is available on the client and treatment characteristics that contribute to treatment costs and benefits. This study analyzed a sample of treatment clients from the Chicago Target Cities Project to develop estimation techniques and to determine predictors of treatment cost, benefit, and net benefit. The Chicago Project was a quasi-experimental evaluation study of individuals (N=2,862) in various addiction treatment facilities. The economic analysis component was conducted in two stages. First, previously published methods were employed to estimate cost and benefit during the 6-month follow-up. Subsequently, these measures were used to compute average cost, benefit, net benefit, and the benefit-cost ratio. Second, the distributions of cost, benefit, and net benefit were statistically examined, and empirical models were selected for handling non-normal data. These models were subsequently estimated to identify the predictors of cost, benefit, and net benefit. Results indicate that the average (per client) cost of all treatment services from baseline to follow-up was $1943. The average treatment benefit was $8268, leading to an average net benefit of $6325 and a benefit-cost ratio of 4.26. Furthermore, findings from a robust regression suggest that: (1) age, race, age at first drug use, treatment modality, and some treatment characteristics were significantly related to treatment cost, and (2) education, age at first drug use, some ASI scores, some types of treatment, and resistance to continuing care were related to treatment benefit and net benefit. In conclusion, for the average individual, the net benefit (benefit-cost ratio) of treatment was significantly greater than zero (one). Furthermore, cost and benefit were significantly related to certain client and program characteristics. Future studies may find these empirical models useful when investigating the predictors of the costs and benefits of addiction treatment.

KW - Addiction treatment

KW - Econometric analysis

KW - Economic evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041903647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041903647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00036-3

DO - 10.1016/S0149-7189(03)00036-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0041903647

VL - 26

SP - 325

EP - 338

JO - Evaluation and Program Planning

JF - Evaluation and Program Planning

SN - 0149-7189

IS - 3

ER -