Introductions During Time-outs: Do Surgical Team Members Know One Another's Names?

David J. Birnbach, Lisa F. Rosen, Maureen Fitzpatrick, John T. Paige, Kristopher Arheart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Introductions are the first item of the time-out in the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC). It has yet to be established that surgical teams use colleagues' names or consider the use of names important. A study was conducted to determine if using the SSC has a measurable impact on name retention and to assess if operating room (OR) personnel believe it is important to know the names of their colleagues or for their colleagues to know theirs. Methods: All OR personnel were individually interviewed at the end of 25 surgical cases in which the SSC was used. They were asked (1) to name each OR participant, and (2) if they believed it is important to know the names of their team members and (3) for their team members to know their name. Results: Of the 150 OR personnel interviewed, 147 (98%) named the surgery attending correctly. The surgery attending named only 44% of other OR staff (p <. 0.001). Only 62% of the OR staff correctly named the anesthesiology attending. The anesthesiology resident was the least well known but was able to name 82% of the others. The anesthesiology attending named his or her resident 100% of the time; the surgery attending correctly named his or her resident only 68% of the time (p = 0.002). Conclusion: This study suggests that OR personnel may consider introductions to be another bureaucratic hurdle instead of the safety check they were designed to be. It appears that this first step of the time-out is often being performed perfunctorily.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJoint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Operating Rooms
Names
Anesthesiology
Checklist
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Introductions During Time-outs : Do Surgical Team Members Know One Another's Names? / Birnbach, David J.; Rosen, Lisa F.; Fitzpatrick, Maureen; Paige, John T.; Arheart, Kristopher.

In: Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d89105757624a36b083695c14e88223,
title = "Introductions During Time-outs: Do Surgical Team Members Know One Another's Names?",
abstract = "Background: Introductions are the first item of the time-out in the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC). It has yet to be established that surgical teams use colleagues' names or consider the use of names important. A study was conducted to determine if using the SSC has a measurable impact on name retention and to assess if operating room (OR) personnel believe it is important to know the names of their colleagues or for their colleagues to know theirs. Methods: All OR personnel were individually interviewed at the end of 25 surgical cases in which the SSC was used. They were asked (1) to name each OR participant, and (2) if they believed it is important to know the names of their team members and (3) for their team members to know their name. Results: Of the 150 OR personnel interviewed, 147 (98{\%}) named the surgery attending correctly. The surgery attending named only 44{\%} of other OR staff (p <. 0.001). Only 62{\%} of the OR staff correctly named the anesthesiology attending. The anesthesiology resident was the least well known but was able to name 82{\%} of the others. The anesthesiology attending named his or her resident 100{\%} of the time; the surgery attending correctly named his or her resident only 68{\%} of the time (p = 0.002). Conclusion: This study suggests that OR personnel may consider introductions to be another bureaucratic hurdle instead of the safety check they were designed to be. It appears that this first step of the time-out is often being performed perfunctorily.",
author = "Birnbach, {David J.} and Rosen, {Lisa F.} and Maureen Fitzpatrick and Paige, {John T.} and Kristopher Arheart",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.03.001",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety",
issn = "1553-7250",
publisher = "Joint Commission Resources, Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introductions During Time-outs

T2 - Do Surgical Team Members Know One Another's Names?

AU - Birnbach, David J.

AU - Rosen, Lisa F.

AU - Fitzpatrick, Maureen

AU - Paige, John T.

AU - Arheart, Kristopher

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: Introductions are the first item of the time-out in the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC). It has yet to be established that surgical teams use colleagues' names or consider the use of names important. A study was conducted to determine if using the SSC has a measurable impact on name retention and to assess if operating room (OR) personnel believe it is important to know the names of their colleagues or for their colleagues to know theirs. Methods: All OR personnel were individually interviewed at the end of 25 surgical cases in which the SSC was used. They were asked (1) to name each OR participant, and (2) if they believed it is important to know the names of their team members and (3) for their team members to know their name. Results: Of the 150 OR personnel interviewed, 147 (98%) named the surgery attending correctly. The surgery attending named only 44% of other OR staff (p <. 0.001). Only 62% of the OR staff correctly named the anesthesiology attending. The anesthesiology resident was the least well known but was able to name 82% of the others. The anesthesiology attending named his or her resident 100% of the time; the surgery attending correctly named his or her resident only 68% of the time (p = 0.002). Conclusion: This study suggests that OR personnel may consider introductions to be another bureaucratic hurdle instead of the safety check they were designed to be. It appears that this first step of the time-out is often being performed perfunctorily.

AB - Background: Introductions are the first item of the time-out in the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC). It has yet to be established that surgical teams use colleagues' names or consider the use of names important. A study was conducted to determine if using the SSC has a measurable impact on name retention and to assess if operating room (OR) personnel believe it is important to know the names of their colleagues or for their colleagues to know theirs. Methods: All OR personnel were individually interviewed at the end of 25 surgical cases in which the SSC was used. They were asked (1) to name each OR participant, and (2) if they believed it is important to know the names of their team members and (3) for their team members to know their name. Results: Of the 150 OR personnel interviewed, 147 (98%) named the surgery attending correctly. The surgery attending named only 44% of other OR staff (p <. 0.001). Only 62% of the OR staff correctly named the anesthesiology attending. The anesthesiology resident was the least well known but was able to name 82% of the others. The anesthesiology attending named his or her resident 100% of the time; the surgery attending correctly named his or her resident only 68% of the time (p = 0.002). Conclusion: This study suggests that OR personnel may consider introductions to be another bureaucratic hurdle instead of the safety check they were designed to be. It appears that this first step of the time-out is often being performed perfunctorily.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017554712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017554712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.03.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 28528622

AN - SCOPUS:85017554712

JO - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

JF - Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

SN - 1553-7250

ER -