Intrasubject variability of repeated pulmonary function measurements in preterm ventilated infants

Alvaro Gonzalez, Luca Tortorolo, Tilo Gerhardt, Mario Rojas, Ruth Everett-Thomas, Eduardo Bancalari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study set out to describe the variability and assess the reproducibility of repeated pulmonary function measurements in ventilated preterm infants. We measured tidal volume (V(T)), lung compliance (C(L)), and resistance (R(L)) in 16 infants (mean ± SD: birthweight 1222 ± 343 g) during spontaneous breathing and during mechanical ventilation, suppressing breathing efforts by mild hyperventilation. C(L) and R(L) were calculated from the equation of motion using linear regression analysis (LR), and by the Mead and Wittenberger method (MW). Flow and transpulmonary pressure were recorded for at least two consecutive periods, after which the esophageal tube was removed and replaced 1 hour later for a second set of recordings. The mean percent change (% Δ) between the initial and the repeated measurements with their respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (total agreement = 1, good reproducibility ≥ 0.75). The mean % Δ between initial and repeat measurements during spontaneous breathing ranged from 11% to 14% for C(L) and V(T), and from 22% to 32% for R(L). The variation for R(L) was even higher when the analysis was done separately for the inspiratory and expiratory phase. C(L) and V(T) had good reproducibility (ICC > 0.9), while R(L) was significantly less reproducible (ICC < 0.75). Measurements obtained from mechanical breaths had less variability than from spontaneous breaths, ranging from 8% to 15% for C(L) and V(T), and from 13% to 21% for R(L). Reproducibility assessed by the ICC was good for most measurements during mechanical breaths. The variability and reproducibility of measurements were similar for both methods of analysis during mechanical ventilation, but during spontaneous breathing variability was larger with the MW method than with LR analysis. We concluded that V(T) and C(L) were reproducible during spontaneous and mechanical breathing. However, R(L) measurements were reproducible only during mechanical ventilation. The high variability of R(L) in spontaneously breathing preterm infants may reduce the clinical usefulness of this measurement for individual patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-41
Number of pages7
JournalPediatric Pulmonology
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Premature Infants
Respiration
Lung
Artificial Respiration
Linear Models
Regression Analysis
Lung Compliance
Hyperventilation
Tidal Volume
Confidence Intervals
Pressure

Keywords

  • infants
  • mechanical ventilation
  • pulmonary compliance
  • pulmonary function testing
  • pulmonary resistance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Intrasubject variability of repeated pulmonary function measurements in preterm ventilated infants. / Gonzalez, Alvaro; Tortorolo, Luca; Gerhardt, Tilo; Rojas, Mario; Everett-Thomas, Ruth; Bancalari, Eduardo.

In: Pediatric Pulmonology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.01.1996, p. 35-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gonzalez, Alvaro ; Tortorolo, Luca ; Gerhardt, Tilo ; Rojas, Mario ; Everett-Thomas, Ruth ; Bancalari, Eduardo. / Intrasubject variability of repeated pulmonary function measurements in preterm ventilated infants. In: Pediatric Pulmonology. 1996 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 35-41.
@article{cd50c7a751d547458cd5d5316ce90054,
title = "Intrasubject variability of repeated pulmonary function measurements in preterm ventilated infants",
abstract = "This study set out to describe the variability and assess the reproducibility of repeated pulmonary function measurements in ventilated preterm infants. We measured tidal volume (V(T)), lung compliance (C(L)), and resistance (R(L)) in 16 infants (mean ± SD: birthweight 1222 ± 343 g) during spontaneous breathing and during mechanical ventilation, suppressing breathing efforts by mild hyperventilation. C(L) and R(L) were calculated from the equation of motion using linear regression analysis (LR), and by the Mead and Wittenberger method (MW). Flow and transpulmonary pressure were recorded for at least two consecutive periods, after which the esophageal tube was removed and replaced 1 hour later for a second set of recordings. The mean percent change ({\%} Δ) between the initial and the repeated measurements with their respective 95{\%} confidence intervals were calculated. Reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (total agreement = 1, good reproducibility ≥ 0.75). The mean {\%} Δ between initial and repeat measurements during spontaneous breathing ranged from 11{\%} to 14{\%} for C(L) and V(T), and from 22{\%} to 32{\%} for R(L). The variation for R(L) was even higher when the analysis was done separately for the inspiratory and expiratory phase. C(L) and V(T) had good reproducibility (ICC > 0.9), while R(L) was significantly less reproducible (ICC < 0.75). Measurements obtained from mechanical breaths had less variability than from spontaneous breaths, ranging from 8{\%} to 15{\%} for C(L) and V(T), and from 13{\%} to 21{\%} for R(L). Reproducibility assessed by the ICC was good for most measurements during mechanical breaths. The variability and reproducibility of measurements were similar for both methods of analysis during mechanical ventilation, but during spontaneous breathing variability was larger with the MW method than with LR analysis. We concluded that V(T) and C(L) were reproducible during spontaneous and mechanical breathing. However, R(L) measurements were reproducible only during mechanical ventilation. The high variability of R(L) in spontaneously breathing preterm infants may reduce the clinical usefulness of this measurement for individual patients.",
keywords = "infants, mechanical ventilation, pulmonary compliance, pulmonary function testing, pulmonary resistance",
author = "Alvaro Gonzalez and Luca Tortorolo and Tilo Gerhardt and Mario Rojas and Ruth Everett-Thomas and Eduardo Bancalari",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199601)21:1<35::AID-PPUL6>3.0.CO;2-P",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "35--41",
journal = "Pediatric Pulmonology",
issn = "8755-6863",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intrasubject variability of repeated pulmonary function measurements in preterm ventilated infants

AU - Gonzalez, Alvaro

AU - Tortorolo, Luca

AU - Gerhardt, Tilo

AU - Rojas, Mario

AU - Everett-Thomas, Ruth

AU - Bancalari, Eduardo

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - This study set out to describe the variability and assess the reproducibility of repeated pulmonary function measurements in ventilated preterm infants. We measured tidal volume (V(T)), lung compliance (C(L)), and resistance (R(L)) in 16 infants (mean ± SD: birthweight 1222 ± 343 g) during spontaneous breathing and during mechanical ventilation, suppressing breathing efforts by mild hyperventilation. C(L) and R(L) were calculated from the equation of motion using linear regression analysis (LR), and by the Mead and Wittenberger method (MW). Flow and transpulmonary pressure were recorded for at least two consecutive periods, after which the esophageal tube was removed and replaced 1 hour later for a second set of recordings. The mean percent change (% Δ) between the initial and the repeated measurements with their respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (total agreement = 1, good reproducibility ≥ 0.75). The mean % Δ between initial and repeat measurements during spontaneous breathing ranged from 11% to 14% for C(L) and V(T), and from 22% to 32% for R(L). The variation for R(L) was even higher when the analysis was done separately for the inspiratory and expiratory phase. C(L) and V(T) had good reproducibility (ICC > 0.9), while R(L) was significantly less reproducible (ICC < 0.75). Measurements obtained from mechanical breaths had less variability than from spontaneous breaths, ranging from 8% to 15% for C(L) and V(T), and from 13% to 21% for R(L). Reproducibility assessed by the ICC was good for most measurements during mechanical breaths. The variability and reproducibility of measurements were similar for both methods of analysis during mechanical ventilation, but during spontaneous breathing variability was larger with the MW method than with LR analysis. We concluded that V(T) and C(L) were reproducible during spontaneous and mechanical breathing. However, R(L) measurements were reproducible only during mechanical ventilation. The high variability of R(L) in spontaneously breathing preterm infants may reduce the clinical usefulness of this measurement for individual patients.

AB - This study set out to describe the variability and assess the reproducibility of repeated pulmonary function measurements in ventilated preterm infants. We measured tidal volume (V(T)), lung compliance (C(L)), and resistance (R(L)) in 16 infants (mean ± SD: birthweight 1222 ± 343 g) during spontaneous breathing and during mechanical ventilation, suppressing breathing efforts by mild hyperventilation. C(L) and R(L) were calculated from the equation of motion using linear regression analysis (LR), and by the Mead and Wittenberger method (MW). Flow and transpulmonary pressure were recorded for at least two consecutive periods, after which the esophageal tube was removed and replaced 1 hour later for a second set of recordings. The mean percent change (% Δ) between the initial and the repeated measurements with their respective 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (total agreement = 1, good reproducibility ≥ 0.75). The mean % Δ between initial and repeat measurements during spontaneous breathing ranged from 11% to 14% for C(L) and V(T), and from 22% to 32% for R(L). The variation for R(L) was even higher when the analysis was done separately for the inspiratory and expiratory phase. C(L) and V(T) had good reproducibility (ICC > 0.9), while R(L) was significantly less reproducible (ICC < 0.75). Measurements obtained from mechanical breaths had less variability than from spontaneous breaths, ranging from 8% to 15% for C(L) and V(T), and from 13% to 21% for R(L). Reproducibility assessed by the ICC was good for most measurements during mechanical breaths. The variability and reproducibility of measurements were similar for both methods of analysis during mechanical ventilation, but during spontaneous breathing variability was larger with the MW method than with LR analysis. We concluded that V(T) and C(L) were reproducible during spontaneous and mechanical breathing. However, R(L) measurements were reproducible only during mechanical ventilation. The high variability of R(L) in spontaneously breathing preterm infants may reduce the clinical usefulness of this measurement for individual patients.

KW - infants

KW - mechanical ventilation

KW - pulmonary compliance

KW - pulmonary function testing

KW - pulmonary resistance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029919515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029919515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199601)21:1<35::AID-PPUL6>3.0.CO;2-P

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199601)21:1<35::AID-PPUL6>3.0.CO;2-P

M3 - Article

C2 - 8776264

AN - SCOPUS:0029919515

VL - 21

SP - 35

EP - 41

JO - Pediatric Pulmonology

JF - Pediatric Pulmonology

SN - 8755-6863

IS - 1

ER -