Intimate Partner Violence Screening and Response: Policies and Procedures Across Health Care Facilities

Jessica Williams, Valerie Halstead, Deborah Salani, Natasha Koermer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines policies and procedures for identifying and responding to intimate partner violence (IPV) among different types of health care settings. Methods: This epidemiologic, cross-sectional, observational study design collected data from June 2014 to January 2015 through a telephone questionnaire from a stratified random sample of 288 health care facilities in Miami-Dade County, Florida. An overall response rate of 76.2% was achieved from 72 primary care clinics, 93 obstetrics/gynecology clinics, 106 pediatric clinics, and 17 emergency departments (EDs). Results: There is a general awareness of the importance of IPV screening with 78.1% of facilities (95% CI, 73.9%-82.3%) reporting some type of IPV screening procedures. Wide variation exists, however, in how practices are implemented, with only 35.3% of facilities (95% CI, 29.5%-41.1%) implementing multicomponent, comprehensive IPV screening and response programs. Differences were also observed by setting with EDs reporting the most comprehensive programs. Conclusions: This study yields important empirical information regarding the extent to which IPV screening and response procedures are currently being implemented in both clinic and acute health care settings along with areas where improvements are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalWomen's Health Issues
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Aug 13 2015

Fingerprint

Health Facilities
health care
violence
Delivery of Health Care
Hospital Emergency Service
Epidemiologic Methods
gynecology
policy studies
obstetrics
Gynecology
Telephone
cross-sectional study
random sample
Obstetrics
Observational Studies
telephone
Primary Health Care
Cross-Sectional Studies
Intimate Partner Violence
Pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Maternity and Midwifery
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Intimate Partner Violence Screening and Response : Policies and Procedures Across Health Care Facilities. / Williams, Jessica; Halstead, Valerie; Salani, Deborah; Koermer, Natasha.

In: Women's Health Issues, 13.08.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fdd7023729f2444dac376dd71bb1368e,
title = "Intimate Partner Violence Screening and Response: Policies and Procedures Across Health Care Facilities",
abstract = "Purpose: This study examines policies and procedures for identifying and responding to intimate partner violence (IPV) among different types of health care settings. Methods: This epidemiologic, cross-sectional, observational study design collected data from June 2014 to January 2015 through a telephone questionnaire from a stratified random sample of 288 health care facilities in Miami-Dade County, Florida. An overall response rate of 76.2{\%} was achieved from 72 primary care clinics, 93 obstetrics/gynecology clinics, 106 pediatric clinics, and 17 emergency departments (EDs). Results: There is a general awareness of the importance of IPV screening with 78.1{\%} of facilities (95{\%} CI, 73.9{\%}-82.3{\%}) reporting some type of IPV screening procedures. Wide variation exists, however, in how practices are implemented, with only 35.3{\%} of facilities (95{\%} CI, 29.5{\%}-41.1{\%}) implementing multicomponent, comprehensive IPV screening and response programs. Differences were also observed by setting with EDs reporting the most comprehensive programs. Conclusions: This study yields important empirical information regarding the extent to which IPV screening and response procedures are currently being implemented in both clinic and acute health care settings along with areas where improvements are needed.",
author = "Jessica Williams and Valerie Halstead and Deborah Salani and Natasha Koermer",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1016/j.whi.2016.03.006",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Women's Health Issues",
issn = "1049-3867",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intimate Partner Violence Screening and Response

T2 - Policies and Procedures Across Health Care Facilities

AU - Williams, Jessica

AU - Halstead, Valerie

AU - Salani, Deborah

AU - Koermer, Natasha

PY - 2015/8/13

Y1 - 2015/8/13

N2 - Purpose: This study examines policies and procedures for identifying and responding to intimate partner violence (IPV) among different types of health care settings. Methods: This epidemiologic, cross-sectional, observational study design collected data from June 2014 to January 2015 through a telephone questionnaire from a stratified random sample of 288 health care facilities in Miami-Dade County, Florida. An overall response rate of 76.2% was achieved from 72 primary care clinics, 93 obstetrics/gynecology clinics, 106 pediatric clinics, and 17 emergency departments (EDs). Results: There is a general awareness of the importance of IPV screening with 78.1% of facilities (95% CI, 73.9%-82.3%) reporting some type of IPV screening procedures. Wide variation exists, however, in how practices are implemented, with only 35.3% of facilities (95% CI, 29.5%-41.1%) implementing multicomponent, comprehensive IPV screening and response programs. Differences were also observed by setting with EDs reporting the most comprehensive programs. Conclusions: This study yields important empirical information regarding the extent to which IPV screening and response procedures are currently being implemented in both clinic and acute health care settings along with areas where improvements are needed.

AB - Purpose: This study examines policies and procedures for identifying and responding to intimate partner violence (IPV) among different types of health care settings. Methods: This epidemiologic, cross-sectional, observational study design collected data from June 2014 to January 2015 through a telephone questionnaire from a stratified random sample of 288 health care facilities in Miami-Dade County, Florida. An overall response rate of 76.2% was achieved from 72 primary care clinics, 93 obstetrics/gynecology clinics, 106 pediatric clinics, and 17 emergency departments (EDs). Results: There is a general awareness of the importance of IPV screening with 78.1% of facilities (95% CI, 73.9%-82.3%) reporting some type of IPV screening procedures. Wide variation exists, however, in how practices are implemented, with only 35.3% of facilities (95% CI, 29.5%-41.1%) implementing multicomponent, comprehensive IPV screening and response programs. Differences were also observed by setting with EDs reporting the most comprehensive programs. Conclusions: This study yields important empirical information regarding the extent to which IPV screening and response procedures are currently being implemented in both clinic and acute health care settings along with areas where improvements are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962014083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962014083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.whi.2016.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.whi.2016.03.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 27052824

AN - SCOPUS:84962014083

JO - Women's Health Issues

JF - Women's Health Issues

SN - 1049-3867

ER -