Interrater and intrarater reliability of ventilatory thresholds determined in individuals with spinal cord injury

Ingrid Kouwijzer, Rachel E Cowan, Jennifer L. Maher, Floor P. Groot, Feikje Riedstra, Linda J.M. Valent, Lucas H.V. van der Woude, Sonja de Groot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Study design: Cross-sectional. Objectives: Individualized training regimes are often based on ventilatory thresholds (VTs). The objectives were to study: (1) whether VTs during arm ergometry could be determined in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) the intrarater and interrater reliability of VT determination. Setting: University research laboratory. Methods: Thirty graded arm crank ergometry exercise tests with 1-min increments of recreationally active individuals (tetraplegia (N = 11), paraplegia (N = 19)) were assessed. Two sports physicians assessed all tests blinded, randomly, in two sessions, for VT1 and VT2, resulting in 240 possible VTs. Power output (PO), heart rate (HR), and oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) at each VT were compared between sessions or raters using paired samples t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, relative agreement), and Bland–Altman plots (random error, absolute agreement). Results: Of the 240 VTs, 217 (90%) could be determined. Of the 23 undetermined VTs, 2 (9%) were VT1 and 21 (91%) were VT2; 7 (30%) among individuals with paraplegia, and 16 (70%) among individuals with tetraplegia. For the successfully determined VTs, there were no systematic differences between sessions or raters. Intrarater and interrater ICCs for PO, HR, and VO 2 at each VT were high to very high (0.82–1.00). Random error was small to large within raters, and large between raters. Conclusions: For VTs that could be determined, relative agreement was high to very high, absolute agreement varied. For some individuals, often with tetraplegia, VT determination was not possible, thus other methods should be considered to prescribe exercise intensity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSpinal Cord
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quadriplegia
Spinal Cord Injuries
Ergometry
Paraplegia
Heart Rate
Nonparametric Statistics
Exercise Test
Sports
Cross-Sectional Studies
Exercise
Oxygen
Physicians
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Interrater and intrarater reliability of ventilatory thresholds determined in individuals with spinal cord injury. / Kouwijzer, Ingrid; Cowan, Rachel E; Maher, Jennifer L.; Groot, Floor P.; Riedstra, Feikje; Valent, Linda J.M.; van der Woude, Lucas H.V.; de Groot, Sonja.

In: Spinal Cord, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kouwijzer, Ingrid ; Cowan, Rachel E ; Maher, Jennifer L. ; Groot, Floor P. ; Riedstra, Feikje ; Valent, Linda J.M. ; van der Woude, Lucas H.V. ; de Groot, Sonja. / Interrater and intrarater reliability of ventilatory thresholds determined in individuals with spinal cord injury. In: Spinal Cord. 2019.
@article{e8d91e2e50da4fcab1224807fb7129e9,
title = "Interrater and intrarater reliability of ventilatory thresholds determined in individuals with spinal cord injury",
abstract = "Study design: Cross-sectional. Objectives: Individualized training regimes are often based on ventilatory thresholds (VTs). The objectives were to study: (1) whether VTs during arm ergometry could be determined in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) the intrarater and interrater reliability of VT determination. Setting: University research laboratory. Methods: Thirty graded arm crank ergometry exercise tests with 1-min increments of recreationally active individuals (tetraplegia (N = 11), paraplegia (N = 19)) were assessed. Two sports physicians assessed all tests blinded, randomly, in two sessions, for VT1 and VT2, resulting in 240 possible VTs. Power output (PO), heart rate (HR), and oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) at each VT were compared between sessions or raters using paired samples t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, relative agreement), and Bland–Altman plots (random error, absolute agreement). Results: Of the 240 VTs, 217 (90{\%}) could be determined. Of the 23 undetermined VTs, 2 (9{\%}) were VT1 and 21 (91{\%}) were VT2; 7 (30{\%}) among individuals with paraplegia, and 16 (70{\%}) among individuals with tetraplegia. For the successfully determined VTs, there were no systematic differences between sessions or raters. Intrarater and interrater ICCs for PO, HR, and VO 2 at each VT were high to very high (0.82–1.00). Random error was small to large within raters, and large between raters. Conclusions: For VTs that could be determined, relative agreement was high to very high, absolute agreement varied. For some individuals, often with tetraplegia, VT determination was not possible, thus other methods should be considered to prescribe exercise intensity.",
author = "Ingrid Kouwijzer and Cowan, {Rachel E} and Maher, {Jennifer L.} and Groot, {Floor P.} and Feikje Riedstra and Valent, {Linda J.M.} and {van der Woude}, {Lucas H.V.} and {de Groot}, Sonja",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41393-019-0262-8",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Spinal Cord",
issn = "1362-4393",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrater and intrarater reliability of ventilatory thresholds determined in individuals with spinal cord injury

AU - Kouwijzer, Ingrid

AU - Cowan, Rachel E

AU - Maher, Jennifer L.

AU - Groot, Floor P.

AU - Riedstra, Feikje

AU - Valent, Linda J.M.

AU - van der Woude, Lucas H.V.

AU - de Groot, Sonja

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Study design: Cross-sectional. Objectives: Individualized training regimes are often based on ventilatory thresholds (VTs). The objectives were to study: (1) whether VTs during arm ergometry could be determined in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) the intrarater and interrater reliability of VT determination. Setting: University research laboratory. Methods: Thirty graded arm crank ergometry exercise tests with 1-min increments of recreationally active individuals (tetraplegia (N = 11), paraplegia (N = 19)) were assessed. Two sports physicians assessed all tests blinded, randomly, in two sessions, for VT1 and VT2, resulting in 240 possible VTs. Power output (PO), heart rate (HR), and oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) at each VT were compared between sessions or raters using paired samples t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, relative agreement), and Bland–Altman plots (random error, absolute agreement). Results: Of the 240 VTs, 217 (90%) could be determined. Of the 23 undetermined VTs, 2 (9%) were VT1 and 21 (91%) were VT2; 7 (30%) among individuals with paraplegia, and 16 (70%) among individuals with tetraplegia. For the successfully determined VTs, there were no systematic differences between sessions or raters. Intrarater and interrater ICCs for PO, HR, and VO 2 at each VT were high to very high (0.82–1.00). Random error was small to large within raters, and large between raters. Conclusions: For VTs that could be determined, relative agreement was high to very high, absolute agreement varied. For some individuals, often with tetraplegia, VT determination was not possible, thus other methods should be considered to prescribe exercise intensity.

AB - Study design: Cross-sectional. Objectives: Individualized training regimes are often based on ventilatory thresholds (VTs). The objectives were to study: (1) whether VTs during arm ergometry could be determined in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) the intrarater and interrater reliability of VT determination. Setting: University research laboratory. Methods: Thirty graded arm crank ergometry exercise tests with 1-min increments of recreationally active individuals (tetraplegia (N = 11), paraplegia (N = 19)) were assessed. Two sports physicians assessed all tests blinded, randomly, in two sessions, for VT1 and VT2, resulting in 240 possible VTs. Power output (PO), heart rate (HR), and oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) at each VT were compared between sessions or raters using paired samples t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, relative agreement), and Bland–Altman plots (random error, absolute agreement). Results: Of the 240 VTs, 217 (90%) could be determined. Of the 23 undetermined VTs, 2 (9%) were VT1 and 21 (91%) were VT2; 7 (30%) among individuals with paraplegia, and 16 (70%) among individuals with tetraplegia. For the successfully determined VTs, there were no systematic differences between sessions or raters. Intrarater and interrater ICCs for PO, HR, and VO 2 at each VT were high to very high (0.82–1.00). Random error was small to large within raters, and large between raters. Conclusions: For VTs that could be determined, relative agreement was high to very high, absolute agreement varied. For some individuals, often with tetraplegia, VT determination was not possible, thus other methods should be considered to prescribe exercise intensity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062450129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062450129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41393-019-0262-8

DO - 10.1038/s41393-019-0262-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062450129

JO - Spinal Cord

JF - Spinal Cord

SN - 1362-4393

ER -