Abstract
Mainstream social sciences in the 20th century have always been highly fragmented, with considerable isolation among disciplines such as psychology, sociology, and political science and many disconnected islands of theory and research pursued within each field. Today, even more fundamental epistemological questions about the nature of human action or social life and the proper way to explain or understand it are hotly debated and remain quite unresolved. This article argues that it may be helpful broadly to classify diverse approaches to social or human science as (a) explanatory, (b) descriptivist, (c) critical, (d) postmodern/social constructionist, and (e) hermeneutic or interpretive approaches to such inquiry. Every such typology is shaped by its own epistemological ideals and value commitments. The authors try to make their commitments explicit and explain some of the ways they feel that an interpretive social science or hermeneutic viewpoint offers a relatively coherent view of social inquiry that assists them in incorporating the virtues and avoiding the limitations of other approaches.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 465-495 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | American Behavioral Scientist |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - Jan 1 1998 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychology(all)
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Sciences(all)
Cite this
Interpretive social science : An overview. / Richardson, Frank C.; Fowers, Blaine.
In: American Behavioral Scientist, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 465-495.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Interpretive social science
T2 - An overview
AU - Richardson, Frank C.
AU - Fowers, Blaine
PY - 1998/1/1
Y1 - 1998/1/1
N2 - Mainstream social sciences in the 20th century have always been highly fragmented, with considerable isolation among disciplines such as psychology, sociology, and political science and many disconnected islands of theory and research pursued within each field. Today, even more fundamental epistemological questions about the nature of human action or social life and the proper way to explain or understand it are hotly debated and remain quite unresolved. This article argues that it may be helpful broadly to classify diverse approaches to social or human science as (a) explanatory, (b) descriptivist, (c) critical, (d) postmodern/social constructionist, and (e) hermeneutic or interpretive approaches to such inquiry. Every such typology is shaped by its own epistemological ideals and value commitments. The authors try to make their commitments explicit and explain some of the ways they feel that an interpretive social science or hermeneutic viewpoint offers a relatively coherent view of social inquiry that assists them in incorporating the virtues and avoiding the limitations of other approaches.
AB - Mainstream social sciences in the 20th century have always been highly fragmented, with considerable isolation among disciplines such as psychology, sociology, and political science and many disconnected islands of theory and research pursued within each field. Today, even more fundamental epistemological questions about the nature of human action or social life and the proper way to explain or understand it are hotly debated and remain quite unresolved. This article argues that it may be helpful broadly to classify diverse approaches to social or human science as (a) explanatory, (b) descriptivist, (c) critical, (d) postmodern/social constructionist, and (e) hermeneutic or interpretive approaches to such inquiry. Every such typology is shaped by its own epistemological ideals and value commitments. The authors try to make their commitments explicit and explain some of the ways they feel that an interpretive social science or hermeneutic viewpoint offers a relatively coherent view of social inquiry that assists them in incorporating the virtues and avoiding the limitations of other approaches.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038901538&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038901538&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0038901538
SP - 465
EP - 495
JO - American Behavioral Scientist
JF - American Behavioral Scientist
SN - 0002-7642
IS - 4
ER -