Interobserver variability of selective region-of-interest measurement protocols for quantitative diffusion weighted imaging in soft tissue masses: Comparison with whole tumor volume measurements

Shivani Ahlawat, Paras Khandheria, Filippo Del Grande, John Morelli, Ty Subhawong, Shadpour Demehri, Laura M. Fayad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background To assess the interobserver reliability of three selective region-of-interest (ROI) measurement protocols for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantifications in soft tissue masses (STMs) compared with whole tumor volume (WTV) ADC measurements. Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent was waived. Three observers independently measured minimum and mean ADCs of 73 benign and malignant musculoskeletal STMs using three selective methods (single-slice [SS], predefined three slices [PD], observer-based [OB]) and WTV measurements at 3.0 Tesla. Minimum and mean ADC values derived from each method were compared with WTV measurements, and inter-reader variation was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The time required for each method of ADC measurement was recorded. Results For the SS, PD, OB, and WTV methods, minimum ADC values ((×10-3 mm2/s)) were 0.97, 0.78, 0.73, and 0.67, respectively, and mean ADC values ((×10-3 mm2/s)) were 1.49, 1.49, 1.51, and 1.49, respectively. Interobserver agreement was good to excellent for the minimum and mean ADC values for the three readers using the SS, PD, OB, and WTV (ICC range 0.78-0.90). The SS, PD and OB methods required the least amount of measurement time (14 ± 5, 40 ± 17, and 38 ± 15 s, respectively) while the reference WTV method required the longest measurement time (111 ± 54 s) (P <0.01). Conclusion While all selective and WTV measurements offer good to excellent interobserver agreement, the selective OB method of ADC measurement results in the closest values to WTV measurements and requires significantly less measurement time than that required for the WTV method. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:446-454.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)446-454
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Observer Variation
Tumor Burden
Research Ethics Committees
Informed Consent

Keywords

  • ADC measurement
  • DWI
  • interobserver reliability
  • soft tissue masses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Interobserver variability of selective region-of-interest measurement protocols for quantitative diffusion weighted imaging in soft tissue masses : Comparison with whole tumor volume measurements. / Ahlawat, Shivani; Khandheria, Paras; Del Grande, Filippo; Morelli, John; Subhawong, Ty; Demehri, Shadpour; Fayad, Laura M.

In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 446-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{73704568d1ea4a149ae2bb6620356dc2,
title = "Interobserver variability of selective region-of-interest measurement protocols for quantitative diffusion weighted imaging in soft tissue masses: Comparison with whole tumor volume measurements",
abstract = "Background To assess the interobserver reliability of three selective region-of-interest (ROI) measurement protocols for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantifications in soft tissue masses (STMs) compared with whole tumor volume (WTV) ADC measurements. Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent was waived. Three observers independently measured minimum and mean ADCs of 73 benign and malignant musculoskeletal STMs using three selective methods (single-slice [SS], predefined three slices [PD], observer-based [OB]) and WTV measurements at 3.0 Tesla. Minimum and mean ADC values derived from each method were compared with WTV measurements, and inter-reader variation was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The time required for each method of ADC measurement was recorded. Results For the SS, PD, OB, and WTV methods, minimum ADC values ((×10-3 mm2/s)) were 0.97, 0.78, 0.73, and 0.67, respectively, and mean ADC values ((×10-3 mm2/s)) were 1.49, 1.49, 1.51, and 1.49, respectively. Interobserver agreement was good to excellent for the minimum and mean ADC values for the three readers using the SS, PD, OB, and WTV (ICC range 0.78-0.90). The SS, PD and OB methods required the least amount of measurement time (14 ± 5, 40 ± 17, and 38 ± 15 s, respectively) while the reference WTV method required the longest measurement time (111 ± 54 s) (P <0.01). Conclusion While all selective and WTV measurements offer good to excellent interobserver agreement, the selective OB method of ADC measurement results in the closest values to WTV measurements and requires significantly less measurement time than that required for the WTV method. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:446-454.",
keywords = "ADC measurement, DWI, interobserver reliability, soft tissue masses",
author = "Shivani Ahlawat and Paras Khandheria and {Del Grande}, Filippo and John Morelli and Ty Subhawong and Shadpour Demehri and Fayad, {Laura M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jmri.24994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "446--454",
journal = "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "1053-1807",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interobserver variability of selective region-of-interest measurement protocols for quantitative diffusion weighted imaging in soft tissue masses

T2 - Comparison with whole tumor volume measurements

AU - Ahlawat, Shivani

AU - Khandheria, Paras

AU - Del Grande, Filippo

AU - Morelli, John

AU - Subhawong, Ty

AU - Demehri, Shadpour

AU - Fayad, Laura M.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Background To assess the interobserver reliability of three selective region-of-interest (ROI) measurement protocols for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantifications in soft tissue masses (STMs) compared with whole tumor volume (WTV) ADC measurements. Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent was waived. Three observers independently measured minimum and mean ADCs of 73 benign and malignant musculoskeletal STMs using three selective methods (single-slice [SS], predefined three slices [PD], observer-based [OB]) and WTV measurements at 3.0 Tesla. Minimum and mean ADC values derived from each method were compared with WTV measurements, and inter-reader variation was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The time required for each method of ADC measurement was recorded. Results For the SS, PD, OB, and WTV methods, minimum ADC values ((×10-3 mm2/s)) were 0.97, 0.78, 0.73, and 0.67, respectively, and mean ADC values ((×10-3 mm2/s)) were 1.49, 1.49, 1.51, and 1.49, respectively. Interobserver agreement was good to excellent for the minimum and mean ADC values for the three readers using the SS, PD, OB, and WTV (ICC range 0.78-0.90). The SS, PD and OB methods required the least amount of measurement time (14 ± 5, 40 ± 17, and 38 ± 15 s, respectively) while the reference WTV method required the longest measurement time (111 ± 54 s) (P <0.01). Conclusion While all selective and WTV measurements offer good to excellent interobserver agreement, the selective OB method of ADC measurement results in the closest values to WTV measurements and requires significantly less measurement time than that required for the WTV method. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:446-454.

AB - Background To assess the interobserver reliability of three selective region-of-interest (ROI) measurement protocols for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantifications in soft tissue masses (STMs) compared with whole tumor volume (WTV) ADC measurements. Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and informed consent was waived. Three observers independently measured minimum and mean ADCs of 73 benign and malignant musculoskeletal STMs using three selective methods (single-slice [SS], predefined three slices [PD], observer-based [OB]) and WTV measurements at 3.0 Tesla. Minimum and mean ADC values derived from each method were compared with WTV measurements, and inter-reader variation was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The time required for each method of ADC measurement was recorded. Results For the SS, PD, OB, and WTV methods, minimum ADC values ((×10-3 mm2/s)) were 0.97, 0.78, 0.73, and 0.67, respectively, and mean ADC values ((×10-3 mm2/s)) were 1.49, 1.49, 1.51, and 1.49, respectively. Interobserver agreement was good to excellent for the minimum and mean ADC values for the three readers using the SS, PD, OB, and WTV (ICC range 0.78-0.90). The SS, PD and OB methods required the least amount of measurement time (14 ± 5, 40 ± 17, and 38 ± 15 s, respectively) while the reference WTV method required the longest measurement time (111 ± 54 s) (P <0.01). Conclusion While all selective and WTV measurements offer good to excellent interobserver agreement, the selective OB method of ADC measurement results in the closest values to WTV measurements and requires significantly less measurement time than that required for the WTV method. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:446-454.

KW - ADC measurement

KW - DWI

KW - interobserver reliability

KW - soft tissue masses

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961226293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961226293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmri.24994

DO - 10.1002/jmri.24994

M3 - Article

C2 - 26174705

AN - SCOPUS:84961226293

VL - 43

SP - 446

EP - 454

JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 1053-1807

IS - 2

ER -