Integrating health and environmental impact analysis

S. Reis, G. Morris, L. E. Fleming, S. Beck, T. Taylor, M. White, M. H. Depledge, S. Steinle, C. E. Sabel, H. Cowie, F. Hurley, J. McP Dick, R. I. Smith, M. Austen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scientific investigations have progressively refined our understanding of the influence of the environment on human health, and the many adverse impacts that human activities exert on the environment, from the local to the planetary level. Nonetheless, throughout the modern public health era, health has been pursued as though our lives and lifestyles are disconnected from ecosystems and their component organisms. The inadequacy of the societal and public health response to obesity, health inequities, and especially global environmental and climate change now calls for an ecological approach which addresses human activity in all its social, economic and cultural complexity. The new approach must be integral to, and interactive, with the natural environment. We see the continuing failure to truly integrate human health and environmental impact analysis as deeply damaging, and we propose a new conceptual model, the ecosystems-enriched Drivers, Pressures, State, Exposure, Effects, Actions or 'eDPSEEA' model, to address this shortcoming. The model recognizes convergence between the concept of ecosystems services which provides a human health and well-being slant to the value of ecosystems while equally emphasizing the health of the environment, and the growing calls for 'ecological public health' as a response to global environmental concerns now suffusing the discourse in public health. More revolution than evolution, ecological public health will demand new perspectives regarding the interconnections among society, the economy, the environment and our health and well-being. Success must be built on collaborations between the disparate scientific communities of the environmental sciences and public health as well as interactions with social scientists, economists and the legal profession. It will require outreach to political and other stakeholders including a currently largely disengaged general public. The need for an effective and robust science-policy interface has never been more pressing. Conceptual models can facilitate this by providing theoretical frameworks and supporting stakeholder engagement process simplifications for inherently complex situations involving environment and human health and well-being. They can be tools to think with, to engage, to communicate and to help navigate in a sea of complexity. We believe models such as eDPSEEA can help frame many of the issues which have become the challenges of the new public health era and can provide the essential platforms necessary for progress. Crown

Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Health
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 7 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public Health
Health
Ecosystem
Human Activities
Environmental Health
Climate Change
Interpersonal Relations
Ecology
Crowns
Life Style
Obesity
Economics
Pressure

Keywords

  • Conceptual framework
  • Ecosystem services
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Impact assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Reis, S., Morris, G., Fleming, L. E., Beck, S., Taylor, T., White, M., ... Austen, M. (Accepted/In press). Integrating health and environmental impact analysis. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2013.07.006

Integrating health and environmental impact analysis. / Reis, S.; Morris, G.; Fleming, L. E.; Beck, S.; Taylor, T.; White, M.; Depledge, M. H.; Steinle, S.; Sabel, C. E.; Cowie, H.; Hurley, F.; Dick, J. McP; Smith, R. I.; Austen, M.

In: Public Health, 07.10.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reis, S, Morris, G, Fleming, LE, Beck, S, Taylor, T, White, M, Depledge, MH, Steinle, S, Sabel, CE, Cowie, H, Hurley, F, Dick, JM, Smith, RI & Austen, M 2013, 'Integrating health and environmental impact analysis', Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2013.07.006
Reis S, Morris G, Fleming LE, Beck S, Taylor T, White M et al. Integrating health and environmental impact analysis. Public Health. 2013 Oct 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2013.07.006
Reis, S. ; Morris, G. ; Fleming, L. E. ; Beck, S. ; Taylor, T. ; White, M. ; Depledge, M. H. ; Steinle, S. ; Sabel, C. E. ; Cowie, H. ; Hurley, F. ; Dick, J. McP ; Smith, R. I. ; Austen, M. / Integrating health and environmental impact analysis. In: Public Health. 2013.
@article{dc2c66089b7240689b80fd327a8061ba,
title = "Integrating health and environmental impact analysis",
abstract = "Scientific investigations have progressively refined our understanding of the influence of the environment on human health, and the many adverse impacts that human activities exert on the environment, from the local to the planetary level. Nonetheless, throughout the modern public health era, health has been pursued as though our lives and lifestyles are disconnected from ecosystems and their component organisms. The inadequacy of the societal and public health response to obesity, health inequities, and especially global environmental and climate change now calls for an ecological approach which addresses human activity in all its social, economic and cultural complexity. The new approach must be integral to, and interactive, with the natural environment. We see the continuing failure to truly integrate human health and environmental impact analysis as deeply damaging, and we propose a new conceptual model, the ecosystems-enriched Drivers, Pressures, State, Exposure, Effects, Actions or 'eDPSEEA' model, to address this shortcoming. The model recognizes convergence between the concept of ecosystems services which provides a human health and well-being slant to the value of ecosystems while equally emphasizing the health of the environment, and the growing calls for 'ecological public health' as a response to global environmental concerns now suffusing the discourse in public health. More revolution than evolution, ecological public health will demand new perspectives regarding the interconnections among society, the economy, the environment and our health and well-being. Success must be built on collaborations between the disparate scientific communities of the environmental sciences and public health as well as interactions with social scientists, economists and the legal profession. It will require outreach to political and other stakeholders including a currently largely disengaged general public. The need for an effective and robust science-policy interface has never been more pressing. Conceptual models can facilitate this by providing theoretical frameworks and supporting stakeholder engagement process simplifications for inherently complex situations involving environment and human health and well-being. They can be tools to think with, to engage, to communicate and to help navigate in a sea of complexity. We believe models such as eDPSEEA can help frame many of the issues which have become the challenges of the new public health era and can provide the essential platforms necessary for progress. Crown",
keywords = "Conceptual framework, Ecosystem services, Environment, Health, Impact assessment",
author = "S. Reis and G. Morris and Fleming, {L. E.} and S. Beck and T. Taylor and M. White and Depledge, {M. H.} and S. Steinle and Sabel, {C. E.} and H. Cowie and F. Hurley and Dick, {J. McP} and Smith, {R. I.} and M. Austen",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.puhe.2013.07.006",
language = "English",
journal = "Public Health",
issn = "0033-3506",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating health and environmental impact analysis

AU - Reis, S.

AU - Morris, G.

AU - Fleming, L. E.

AU - Beck, S.

AU - Taylor, T.

AU - White, M.

AU - Depledge, M. H.

AU - Steinle, S.

AU - Sabel, C. E.

AU - Cowie, H.

AU - Hurley, F.

AU - Dick, J. McP

AU - Smith, R. I.

AU - Austen, M.

PY - 2013/10/7

Y1 - 2013/10/7

N2 - Scientific investigations have progressively refined our understanding of the influence of the environment on human health, and the many adverse impacts that human activities exert on the environment, from the local to the planetary level. Nonetheless, throughout the modern public health era, health has been pursued as though our lives and lifestyles are disconnected from ecosystems and their component organisms. The inadequacy of the societal and public health response to obesity, health inequities, and especially global environmental and climate change now calls for an ecological approach which addresses human activity in all its social, economic and cultural complexity. The new approach must be integral to, and interactive, with the natural environment. We see the continuing failure to truly integrate human health and environmental impact analysis as deeply damaging, and we propose a new conceptual model, the ecosystems-enriched Drivers, Pressures, State, Exposure, Effects, Actions or 'eDPSEEA' model, to address this shortcoming. The model recognizes convergence between the concept of ecosystems services which provides a human health and well-being slant to the value of ecosystems while equally emphasizing the health of the environment, and the growing calls for 'ecological public health' as a response to global environmental concerns now suffusing the discourse in public health. More revolution than evolution, ecological public health will demand new perspectives regarding the interconnections among society, the economy, the environment and our health and well-being. Success must be built on collaborations between the disparate scientific communities of the environmental sciences and public health as well as interactions with social scientists, economists and the legal profession. It will require outreach to political and other stakeholders including a currently largely disengaged general public. The need for an effective and robust science-policy interface has never been more pressing. Conceptual models can facilitate this by providing theoretical frameworks and supporting stakeholder engagement process simplifications for inherently complex situations involving environment and human health and well-being. They can be tools to think with, to engage, to communicate and to help navigate in a sea of complexity. We believe models such as eDPSEEA can help frame many of the issues which have become the challenges of the new public health era and can provide the essential platforms necessary for progress. Crown

AB - Scientific investigations have progressively refined our understanding of the influence of the environment on human health, and the many adverse impacts that human activities exert on the environment, from the local to the planetary level. Nonetheless, throughout the modern public health era, health has been pursued as though our lives and lifestyles are disconnected from ecosystems and their component organisms. The inadequacy of the societal and public health response to obesity, health inequities, and especially global environmental and climate change now calls for an ecological approach which addresses human activity in all its social, economic and cultural complexity. The new approach must be integral to, and interactive, with the natural environment. We see the continuing failure to truly integrate human health and environmental impact analysis as deeply damaging, and we propose a new conceptual model, the ecosystems-enriched Drivers, Pressures, State, Exposure, Effects, Actions or 'eDPSEEA' model, to address this shortcoming. The model recognizes convergence between the concept of ecosystems services which provides a human health and well-being slant to the value of ecosystems while equally emphasizing the health of the environment, and the growing calls for 'ecological public health' as a response to global environmental concerns now suffusing the discourse in public health. More revolution than evolution, ecological public health will demand new perspectives regarding the interconnections among society, the economy, the environment and our health and well-being. Success must be built on collaborations between the disparate scientific communities of the environmental sciences and public health as well as interactions with social scientists, economists and the legal profession. It will require outreach to political and other stakeholders including a currently largely disengaged general public. The need for an effective and robust science-policy interface has never been more pressing. Conceptual models can facilitate this by providing theoretical frameworks and supporting stakeholder engagement process simplifications for inherently complex situations involving environment and human health and well-being. They can be tools to think with, to engage, to communicate and to help navigate in a sea of complexity. We believe models such as eDPSEEA can help frame many of the issues which have become the challenges of the new public health era and can provide the essential platforms necessary for progress. Crown

KW - Conceptual framework

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Environment

KW - Health

KW - Impact assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884836517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884836517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.07.006

DO - 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.07.006

M3 - Article

JO - Public Health

JF - Public Health

SN - 0033-3506

ER -