Abstract
The detection of small renal masses have increased as non-invasive imaging technology has advanced, which in return, has ushered in the era of needle ablation as a viable treatment alternative for those patients with either solitary kidneys or those with advanced age and other co-morbidities which would make them a high risk for extirpative surgery. Needle ablation has the advantage of less trauma to the patient with little risk of hemorrhage and no warm ischemia over partial nephrectomy with encouraging medium to long term oncological outcomes for both radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation. This chapter discusses the instrumentation, techniques, and oncological outcome results from published studies for both radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Percutaneous Renal Surgery |
| Publisher | wiley |
| Pages | 237-252 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781118670903 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781118278734 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 28 2013 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Microwave ablation
- Needle ablation
- Radiofrequency ablation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
Cite this
Instrumentation and Technique : Hyperthermal Ablation: Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation. / Castro, Arturo; Jenkins, Lawrence; Ekwenna, Obi; Shields, John; Salas, Nelson; Leveillee, Raymond.
Percutaneous Renal Surgery. wiley, 2013. p. 237-252.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Instrumentation and Technique
T2 - Hyperthermal Ablation: Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation
AU - Castro, Arturo
AU - Jenkins, Lawrence
AU - Ekwenna, Obi
AU - Shields, John
AU - Salas, Nelson
AU - Leveillee, Raymond
PY - 2013/10/28
Y1 - 2013/10/28
N2 - The detection of small renal masses have increased as non-invasive imaging technology has advanced, which in return, has ushered in the era of needle ablation as a viable treatment alternative for those patients with either solitary kidneys or those with advanced age and other co-morbidities which would make them a high risk for extirpative surgery. Needle ablation has the advantage of less trauma to the patient with little risk of hemorrhage and no warm ischemia over partial nephrectomy with encouraging medium to long term oncological outcomes for both radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation. This chapter discusses the instrumentation, techniques, and oncological outcome results from published studies for both radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation.
AB - The detection of small renal masses have increased as non-invasive imaging technology has advanced, which in return, has ushered in the era of needle ablation as a viable treatment alternative for those patients with either solitary kidneys or those with advanced age and other co-morbidities which would make them a high risk for extirpative surgery. Needle ablation has the advantage of less trauma to the patient with little risk of hemorrhage and no warm ischemia over partial nephrectomy with encouraging medium to long term oncological outcomes for both radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation. This chapter discusses the instrumentation, techniques, and oncological outcome results from published studies for both radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation.
KW - Microwave ablation
KW - Needle ablation
KW - Radiofrequency ablation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889881028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889881028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/9781118670903.ch26
DO - 10.1002/9781118670903.ch26
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:84889881028
SN - 9781118278734
SP - 237
EP - 252
BT - Percutaneous Renal Surgery
PB - wiley
ER -