Informed consent comprehension among vulnerable populations in Ecuador: video-delivered vs. in-person standard method

Ana Quevedo, Cecilia Condo, Gilda Valenzuela, Lucy Molina, Eduardo Castillo, Ana M Palacio, Denisse Pareja, Guillermo J Prado, Yannine Estrada, Maria Rosa Velazquez, Leonardo Tamariz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The informed consent comprehension process is key to engaging potential research subject participation. The aim of this study is to compare informed consent comprehension between two methods: standard and video-delivered. We compared the in-person and video-delivered informed consent process in the Familias Unidas intervention. We evaluated comprehension using a 7-item true/false questionnaire. There were a total of 152 participants in the control group and 87 in the experimental. General characteristics were similar between both groups (p > 0.05). First-attempt informed consent comprehension was higher in the intervention group but was not statistically significant (80% and 78% respectively p = 0.44). A video-delivered informed consent process did not differ from the standard method of informed consent in a low educational and socioeconomic environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalAccountability in Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 17 2018

Fingerprint

Ecuador
comprehension
video
human being
Group
participation
questionnaire

Keywords

  • General medicine/internal medicine
  • informed consent
  • low health literacy
  • low literacy
  • low literacy
  • research ethics
  • telehealth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Informed consent comprehension among vulnerable populations in Ecuador : video-delivered vs. in-person standard method. / Quevedo, Ana; Condo, Cecilia; Valenzuela, Gilda; Molina, Lucy; Castillo, Eduardo; Palacio, Ana M; Pareja, Denisse; Prado, Guillermo J; Estrada, Yannine; Velazquez, Maria Rosa; Tamariz, Leonardo.

In: Accountability in Research, 17.05.2018, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Quevedo, Ana ; Condo, Cecilia ; Valenzuela, Gilda ; Molina, Lucy ; Castillo, Eduardo ; Palacio, Ana M ; Pareja, Denisse ; Prado, Guillermo J ; Estrada, Yannine ; Velazquez, Maria Rosa ; Tamariz, Leonardo. / Informed consent comprehension among vulnerable populations in Ecuador : video-delivered vs. in-person standard method. In: Accountability in Research. 2018 ; pp. 1-14.
@article{d96dbde1bde943fb8cd3160b6a1567f4,
title = "Informed consent comprehension among vulnerable populations in Ecuador: video-delivered vs. in-person standard method",
abstract = "The informed consent comprehension process is key to engaging potential research subject participation. The aim of this study is to compare informed consent comprehension between two methods: standard and video-delivered. We compared the in-person and video-delivered informed consent process in the Familias Unidas intervention. We evaluated comprehension using a 7-item true/false questionnaire. There were a total of 152 participants in the control group and 87 in the experimental. General characteristics were similar between both groups (p > 0.05). First-attempt informed consent comprehension was higher in the intervention group but was not statistically significant (80{\%} and 78{\%} respectively p = 0.44). A video-delivered informed consent process did not differ from the standard method of informed consent in a low educational and socioeconomic environment.",
keywords = "General medicine/internal medicine, informed consent, low health literacy, low literacy, low literacy, research ethics, telehealth",
author = "Ana Quevedo and Cecilia Condo and Gilda Valenzuela and Lucy Molina and Eduardo Castillo and Palacio, {Ana M} and Denisse Pareja and Prado, {Guillermo J} and Yannine Estrada and Velazquez, {Maria Rosa} and Leonardo Tamariz",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/08989621.2018.1470931",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Accountability in Research",
issn = "0898-9621",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informed consent comprehension among vulnerable populations in Ecuador

T2 - video-delivered vs. in-person standard method

AU - Quevedo, Ana

AU - Condo, Cecilia

AU - Valenzuela, Gilda

AU - Molina, Lucy

AU - Castillo, Eduardo

AU - Palacio, Ana M

AU - Pareja, Denisse

AU - Prado, Guillermo J

AU - Estrada, Yannine

AU - Velazquez, Maria Rosa

AU - Tamariz, Leonardo

PY - 2018/5/17

Y1 - 2018/5/17

N2 - The informed consent comprehension process is key to engaging potential research subject participation. The aim of this study is to compare informed consent comprehension between two methods: standard and video-delivered. We compared the in-person and video-delivered informed consent process in the Familias Unidas intervention. We evaluated comprehension using a 7-item true/false questionnaire. There were a total of 152 participants in the control group and 87 in the experimental. General characteristics were similar between both groups (p > 0.05). First-attempt informed consent comprehension was higher in the intervention group but was not statistically significant (80% and 78% respectively p = 0.44). A video-delivered informed consent process did not differ from the standard method of informed consent in a low educational and socioeconomic environment.

AB - The informed consent comprehension process is key to engaging potential research subject participation. The aim of this study is to compare informed consent comprehension between two methods: standard and video-delivered. We compared the in-person and video-delivered informed consent process in the Familias Unidas intervention. We evaluated comprehension using a 7-item true/false questionnaire. There were a total of 152 participants in the control group and 87 in the experimental. General characteristics were similar between both groups (p > 0.05). First-attempt informed consent comprehension was higher in the intervention group but was not statistically significant (80% and 78% respectively p = 0.44). A video-delivered informed consent process did not differ from the standard method of informed consent in a low educational and socioeconomic environment.

KW - General medicine/internal medicine

KW - informed consent

KW - low health literacy

KW - low literacy

KW - low literacy

KW - research ethics

KW - telehealth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047003597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047003597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08989621.2018.1470931

DO - 10.1080/08989621.2018.1470931

M3 - Article

C2 - 29717898

AN - SCOPUS:85047003597

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Accountability in Research

JF - Accountability in Research

SN - 0898-9621

ER -