Informed consent and neuropsychological assessment: Ethical considerations and proposed guidelines

Doug Johnson-Greene, Corinne Hardy-Morais, Kenneth M. Adams, Christine Hardy, Paula Bergloff

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The rationale for obtaining informed consent from patients contains a number of legal, ethical, and moral arguments that are well entrenched in the medical community but which have been embraced only recently by psychologists. The current Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (1992) elucidate informed consent guidelines for treatment and research, but do not provide the same degree of clarity concerning informed consent for clinical assessment. The purpose of this paper is to open a dialogue about the use of informed consent in neuropsychological assessment and to provide proposed recommendations for obtaining informed consent from patients receiving neuropsychological evaluations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)454-460
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Neuropsychologist
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Informed consent and neuropsychological assessment: Ethical considerations and proposed guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this