Influence of critical illness on physicians' prognoses for underlying disease

A randomized study using simulated cases

Andrew Quartin, Ricardo O. Calonge, Roland Schein, Lee A. Crandall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: During critical illness, physicians often provide estimates of the severity of underlying disease to aid patients and families when formulating care directives. We sought to determine whether factors such as the superimposed acute illness, the prognoses of other patients cared for by the same physician, or the phrasing of inquiry influence these assessments of underlying disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Internal medicine attending and resident physicians participated in a computerized, Web-available survey that described two case vignettes, one with cardiomyopathy and the other with lung cancer as underlying diseases. Using random assignment, each respondent was presented one case as having septic shock, and the other as an uneventful clinic visit. Respondents were explicitly asked to ignore the context and to assess the severity of the underlying disease alone to predict survival time and quality of life. The order in which subjects encountered the cases and phrasing of the survival question also were varied through randomization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mortality predictions for the cardiomyopathy case at 5 yrs were sensitive to both context (predicted survival, 39% ± 23% when presented as septic vs. 52% ± 24% when presented as a clinic patient; p < .001) and to whether a lung cancer case was presented before it (39% ± 23% when presented after lung cancer vs. 52% ± 24% when presented before; p < .001). These effects were independent and led to mean predicted 5-yr survival probabilities ranging from 31% to 59%. Predicted 1-yr survival from lung cancer was sensitive to phrasing (p < .05) but not to context. Quality of life predictions were also sensitive to context and case order. CONCLUSIONS: Physician appraisal of underlying disease severity is potentially vulnerable to a number of biases that may be relevant in the critical care setting. These biases appear to vary with the nature of the underlying disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)462-470
Number of pages9
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2008

Fingerprint

Critical Illness
Physicians
Lung Neoplasms
Survival
Cardiomyopathies
Quality of Life
Critical Care
Ambulatory Care
Internal Medicine
Septic Shock
Random Allocation
Mortality
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Comorbidity
  • Decision-making
  • Intensive care units
  • Physician-patient relations
  • Sepsis
  • Septic shock

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Influence of critical illness on physicians' prognoses for underlying disease : A randomized study using simulated cases. / Quartin, Andrew; Calonge, Ricardo O.; Schein, Roland; Crandall, Lee A.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.02.2008, p. 462-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{99dee1c35c9c4a2aa2ce17299bd2ee22,
title = "Influence of critical illness on physicians' prognoses for underlying disease: A randomized study using simulated cases",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: During critical illness, physicians often provide estimates of the severity of underlying disease to aid patients and families when formulating care directives. We sought to determine whether factors such as the superimposed acute illness, the prognoses of other patients cared for by the same physician, or the phrasing of inquiry influence these assessments of underlying disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Internal medicine attending and resident physicians participated in a computerized, Web-available survey that described two case vignettes, one with cardiomyopathy and the other with lung cancer as underlying diseases. Using random assignment, each respondent was presented one case as having septic shock, and the other as an uneventful clinic visit. Respondents were explicitly asked to ignore the context and to assess the severity of the underlying disease alone to predict survival time and quality of life. The order in which subjects encountered the cases and phrasing of the survival question also were varied through randomization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mortality predictions for the cardiomyopathy case at 5 yrs were sensitive to both context (predicted survival, 39{\%} ± 23{\%} when presented as septic vs. 52{\%} ± 24{\%} when presented as a clinic patient; p < .001) and to whether a lung cancer case was presented before it (39{\%} ± 23{\%} when presented after lung cancer vs. 52{\%} ± 24{\%} when presented before; p < .001). These effects were independent and led to mean predicted 5-yr survival probabilities ranging from 31{\%} to 59{\%}. Predicted 1-yr survival from lung cancer was sensitive to phrasing (p < .05) but not to context. Quality of life predictions were also sensitive to context and case order. CONCLUSIONS: Physician appraisal of underlying disease severity is potentially vulnerable to a number of biases that may be relevant in the critical care setting. These biases appear to vary with the nature of the underlying disease.",
keywords = "Comorbidity, Decision-making, Intensive care units, Physician-patient relations, Sepsis, Septic shock",
author = "Andrew Quartin and Calonge, {Ricardo O.} and Roland Schein and Crandall, {Lee A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E3181611F968",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "462--470",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of critical illness on physicians' prognoses for underlying disease

T2 - A randomized study using simulated cases

AU - Quartin, Andrew

AU - Calonge, Ricardo O.

AU - Schein, Roland

AU - Crandall, Lee A.

PY - 2008/2/1

Y1 - 2008/2/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: During critical illness, physicians often provide estimates of the severity of underlying disease to aid patients and families when formulating care directives. We sought to determine whether factors such as the superimposed acute illness, the prognoses of other patients cared for by the same physician, or the phrasing of inquiry influence these assessments of underlying disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Internal medicine attending and resident physicians participated in a computerized, Web-available survey that described two case vignettes, one with cardiomyopathy and the other with lung cancer as underlying diseases. Using random assignment, each respondent was presented one case as having septic shock, and the other as an uneventful clinic visit. Respondents were explicitly asked to ignore the context and to assess the severity of the underlying disease alone to predict survival time and quality of life. The order in which subjects encountered the cases and phrasing of the survival question also were varied through randomization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mortality predictions for the cardiomyopathy case at 5 yrs were sensitive to both context (predicted survival, 39% ± 23% when presented as septic vs. 52% ± 24% when presented as a clinic patient; p < .001) and to whether a lung cancer case was presented before it (39% ± 23% when presented after lung cancer vs. 52% ± 24% when presented before; p < .001). These effects were independent and led to mean predicted 5-yr survival probabilities ranging from 31% to 59%. Predicted 1-yr survival from lung cancer was sensitive to phrasing (p < .05) but not to context. Quality of life predictions were also sensitive to context and case order. CONCLUSIONS: Physician appraisal of underlying disease severity is potentially vulnerable to a number of biases that may be relevant in the critical care setting. These biases appear to vary with the nature of the underlying disease.

AB - OBJECTIVE: During critical illness, physicians often provide estimates of the severity of underlying disease to aid patients and families when formulating care directives. We sought to determine whether factors such as the superimposed acute illness, the prognoses of other patients cared for by the same physician, or the phrasing of inquiry influence these assessments of underlying disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS: Internal medicine attending and resident physicians participated in a computerized, Web-available survey that described two case vignettes, one with cardiomyopathy and the other with lung cancer as underlying diseases. Using random assignment, each respondent was presented one case as having septic shock, and the other as an uneventful clinic visit. Respondents were explicitly asked to ignore the context and to assess the severity of the underlying disease alone to predict survival time and quality of life. The order in which subjects encountered the cases and phrasing of the survival question also were varied through randomization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mortality predictions for the cardiomyopathy case at 5 yrs were sensitive to both context (predicted survival, 39% ± 23% when presented as septic vs. 52% ± 24% when presented as a clinic patient; p < .001) and to whether a lung cancer case was presented before it (39% ± 23% when presented after lung cancer vs. 52% ± 24% when presented before; p < .001). These effects were independent and led to mean predicted 5-yr survival probabilities ranging from 31% to 59%. Predicted 1-yr survival from lung cancer was sensitive to phrasing (p < .05) but not to context. Quality of life predictions were also sensitive to context and case order. CONCLUSIONS: Physician appraisal of underlying disease severity is potentially vulnerable to a number of biases that may be relevant in the critical care setting. These biases appear to vary with the nature of the underlying disease.

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Decision-making

KW - Intensive care units

KW - Physician-patient relations

KW - Sepsis

KW - Septic shock

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38549143649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38549143649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E3181611F968

DO - 10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E3181611F968

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 462

EP - 470

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 2

ER -