Induced Competence and the Bystander Effect

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research has shown that people are slower to offer help in an emergency when there are other bystanders present than when there are not. It was proposed that exposing subjects to information about treatment of medical emergencies (i.e., experimentally‐induced competence) would decrease this effect. Female college students either did or did not watch a series of public‐service films on medical emergencies under the pretext of evaluating the films' relative effectiveness. Three weeks later, subjects participated in an experiment in which an ostensible co‐subject experienced a choking fit and then fell silent. Subjects who had not viewed the films were slower to respond if they believed themselves to be in 6‐member groups than if they believed themselves to be in 2‐member groups. In contrast, subjects who had viewed the films responded quickly regardless of perceived group size. High competent subjects also responded more quickly than low competent subjects in a condition where another co‐subject gave evidence of being high in competence. Results from a 6‐week follow‐up group indicated, however, that the induced competence was not permanent. Discussion centers on the theoretical implications of the findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-111
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1982

Fingerprint

Bystander Effect
Mental Competency
Emergencies
Emergency Treatment
Airway Obstruction
Students
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Induced Competence and the Bystander Effect. / Pantin, Hilda; Carver, Charles S.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1982, p. 100-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0209c6fa44264fc69dea9d9b1fc458a6,
title = "Induced Competence and the Bystander Effect",
abstract = "Previous research has shown that people are slower to offer help in an emergency when there are other bystanders present than when there are not. It was proposed that exposing subjects to information about treatment of medical emergencies (i.e., experimentally‐induced competence) would decrease this effect. Female college students either did or did not watch a series of public‐service films on medical emergencies under the pretext of evaluating the films' relative effectiveness. Three weeks later, subjects participated in an experiment in which an ostensible co‐subject experienced a choking fit and then fell silent. Subjects who had not viewed the films were slower to respond if they believed themselves to be in 6‐member groups than if they believed themselves to be in 2‐member groups. In contrast, subjects who had viewed the films responded quickly regardless of perceived group size. High competent subjects also responded more quickly than low competent subjects in a condition where another co‐subject gave evidence of being high in competence. Results from a 6‐week follow‐up group indicated, however, that the induced competence was not permanent. Discussion centers on the theoretical implications of the findings.",
author = "Hilda Pantin and Carver, {Charles S}",
year = "1982",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.1982.tb00852.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "100--111",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Induced Competence and the Bystander Effect

AU - Pantin, Hilda

AU - Carver, Charles S

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - Previous research has shown that people are slower to offer help in an emergency when there are other bystanders present than when there are not. It was proposed that exposing subjects to information about treatment of medical emergencies (i.e., experimentally‐induced competence) would decrease this effect. Female college students either did or did not watch a series of public‐service films on medical emergencies under the pretext of evaluating the films' relative effectiveness. Three weeks later, subjects participated in an experiment in which an ostensible co‐subject experienced a choking fit and then fell silent. Subjects who had not viewed the films were slower to respond if they believed themselves to be in 6‐member groups than if they believed themselves to be in 2‐member groups. In contrast, subjects who had viewed the films responded quickly regardless of perceived group size. High competent subjects also responded more quickly than low competent subjects in a condition where another co‐subject gave evidence of being high in competence. Results from a 6‐week follow‐up group indicated, however, that the induced competence was not permanent. Discussion centers on the theoretical implications of the findings.

AB - Previous research has shown that people are slower to offer help in an emergency when there are other bystanders present than when there are not. It was proposed that exposing subjects to information about treatment of medical emergencies (i.e., experimentally‐induced competence) would decrease this effect. Female college students either did or did not watch a series of public‐service films on medical emergencies under the pretext of evaluating the films' relative effectiveness. Three weeks later, subjects participated in an experiment in which an ostensible co‐subject experienced a choking fit and then fell silent. Subjects who had not viewed the films were slower to respond if they believed themselves to be in 6‐member groups than if they believed themselves to be in 2‐member groups. In contrast, subjects who had viewed the films responded quickly regardless of perceived group size. High competent subjects also responded more quickly than low competent subjects in a condition where another co‐subject gave evidence of being high in competence. Results from a 6‐week follow‐up group indicated, however, that the induced competence was not permanent. Discussion centers on the theoretical implications of the findings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0343649126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0343649126&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1982.tb00852.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1982.tb00852.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0343649126

VL - 12

SP - 100

EP - 111

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 2

ER -