Indivisibility and linkage arguments: A reply to gilabert

James Nickel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This reply discusses Pablo Gilabert's response to my article, "Rethinking Indivisibility." It welcomes his distinction between conceptual, normative, epistemic, and causal forms of support from one right to another. It denies, however, that "Rethinking Indivisibility" downplayed linkage arguments for human rights (although it did call for careful evaluation of such arguments), and rejects Gilabert's suggestion that we understand the indivisibility of two rights as two rights being highly useful to each other (interdependence) rather than as mutual indispensability. In the final section, I offer two new worries about the system-wide indivisibility of human rights.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-446
Number of pages8
JournalHuman Rights Quarterly
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

human rights
interdependence
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Indivisibility and linkage arguments : A reply to gilabert. / Nickel, James.

In: Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2, 05.2010, p. 439-446.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nickel, James. / Indivisibility and linkage arguments : A reply to gilabert. In: Human Rights Quarterly. 2010 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 439-446.
@article{b3e16dbcfff14cecb08a283ddc86f698,
title = "Indivisibility and linkage arguments: A reply to gilabert",
abstract = "This reply discusses Pablo Gilabert's response to my article, {"}Rethinking Indivisibility.{"} It welcomes his distinction between conceptual, normative, epistemic, and causal forms of support from one right to another. It denies, however, that {"}Rethinking Indivisibility{"} downplayed linkage arguments for human rights (although it did call for careful evaluation of such arguments), and rejects Gilabert's suggestion that we understand the indivisibility of two rights as two rights being highly useful to each other (interdependence) rather than as mutual indispensability. In the final section, I offer two new worries about the system-wide indivisibility of human rights.",
author = "James Nickel",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1353/hrq.0.0145",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "439--446",
journal = "Human Rights Quarterly",
issn = "0275-0392",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indivisibility and linkage arguments

T2 - A reply to gilabert

AU - Nickel, James

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - This reply discusses Pablo Gilabert's response to my article, "Rethinking Indivisibility." It welcomes his distinction between conceptual, normative, epistemic, and causal forms of support from one right to another. It denies, however, that "Rethinking Indivisibility" downplayed linkage arguments for human rights (although it did call for careful evaluation of such arguments), and rejects Gilabert's suggestion that we understand the indivisibility of two rights as two rights being highly useful to each other (interdependence) rather than as mutual indispensability. In the final section, I offer two new worries about the system-wide indivisibility of human rights.

AB - This reply discusses Pablo Gilabert's response to my article, "Rethinking Indivisibility." It welcomes his distinction between conceptual, normative, epistemic, and causal forms of support from one right to another. It denies, however, that "Rethinking Indivisibility" downplayed linkage arguments for human rights (although it did call for careful evaluation of such arguments), and rejects Gilabert's suggestion that we understand the indivisibility of two rights as two rights being highly useful to each other (interdependence) rather than as mutual indispensability. In the final section, I offer two new worries about the system-wide indivisibility of human rights.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952936539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952936539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/hrq.0.0145

DO - 10.1353/hrq.0.0145

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77952936539

VL - 32

SP - 439

EP - 446

JO - Human Rights Quarterly

JF - Human Rights Quarterly

SN - 0275-0392

IS - 2

ER -