Increased Reliability of Quantitative Ultrasound Measures of the Supraspinatus Tendon Using Multiple Image Analysts and Analysis Runs

Elizabeth Felix, Rachel E Cowan, Tyler S. Clark, Diana D. Cardenas, Robert W Irwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is an inexpensive and promising tool for sensitive measurement of tendon pathology. However, few studies have reported the psychometric properties of measurements obtained using this technique for assessments of the supraspinatus tendon. The present study was undertaken to determine the variance contributed by several sources of error (participant, ultrasound operator, image analyst, analysis session) to QUS measures of the supraspinatus tendon. Transverse images of the supraspinatus tendon were captured from eleven subjects (22 shoulders) by two ultrasonographers, and each image was analyzed by two image analysts who each completed two analysis runs. Generalizability theory and intraclass correlations were used to assess the reliability of seven QUS metrics. Measures of tendon/cartilage thickness demonstrated the greatest degree of overall dependability (φ = 0.84), followed by echogenicity (φ = 0.56), variance (φ = 0.55), and entropy (φ = 0.47), suggesting that these measures of the supraspinatus tendon may be promising metrics for assessing differences in tendon health. Interrater reliability between ultrasound operators ranged from low to moderate for different QUS metrics, but using more than one image analyst and performing repeated measurement analysis runs on each image help increase reliability of QUS measures for the supraspinatus tendon.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-67
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume97
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Rotator Cuff
Tendons
Entropy
Psychometrics
Cartilage
Research Design
Pathology
Health

Keywords

  • Quantitative Ultrasound
  • Reliability
  • Shoulder
  • Supraspinatus
  • Tendon
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{2826fb2ac4aa4ee2b3bc844d4364426f,
title = "Increased Reliability of Quantitative Ultrasound Measures of the Supraspinatus Tendon Using Multiple Image Analysts and Analysis Runs",
abstract = "Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is an inexpensive and promising tool for sensitive measurement of tendon pathology. However, few studies have reported the psychometric properties of measurements obtained using this technique for assessments of the supraspinatus tendon. The present study was undertaken to determine the variance contributed by several sources of error (participant, ultrasound operator, image analyst, analysis session) to QUS measures of the supraspinatus tendon. Transverse images of the supraspinatus tendon were captured from eleven subjects (22 shoulders) by two ultrasonographers, and each image was analyzed by two image analysts who each completed two analysis runs. Generalizability theory and intraclass correlations were used to assess the reliability of seven QUS metrics. Measures of tendon/cartilage thickness demonstrated the greatest degree of overall dependability (φ = 0.84), followed by echogenicity (φ = 0.56), variance (φ = 0.55), and entropy (φ = 0.47), suggesting that these measures of the supraspinatus tendon may be promising metrics for assessing differences in tendon health. Interrater reliability between ultrasound operators ranged from low to moderate for different QUS metrics, but using more than one image analyst and performing repeated measurement analysis runs on each image help increase reliability of QUS measures for the supraspinatus tendon.",
keywords = "Quantitative Ultrasound, Reliability, Shoulder, Supraspinatus, Tendon, Ultrasonography",
author = "Elizabeth Felix and Cowan, {Rachel E} and Clark, {Tyler S.} and Cardenas, {Diana D.} and Irwin, {Robert W}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHM.0000000000000820",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "62--67",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increased Reliability of Quantitative Ultrasound Measures of the Supraspinatus Tendon Using Multiple Image Analysts and Analysis Runs

AU - Felix, Elizabeth

AU - Cowan, Rachel E

AU - Clark, Tyler S.

AU - Cardenas, Diana D.

AU - Irwin, Robert W

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is an inexpensive and promising tool for sensitive measurement of tendon pathology. However, few studies have reported the psychometric properties of measurements obtained using this technique for assessments of the supraspinatus tendon. The present study was undertaken to determine the variance contributed by several sources of error (participant, ultrasound operator, image analyst, analysis session) to QUS measures of the supraspinatus tendon. Transverse images of the supraspinatus tendon were captured from eleven subjects (22 shoulders) by two ultrasonographers, and each image was analyzed by two image analysts who each completed two analysis runs. Generalizability theory and intraclass correlations were used to assess the reliability of seven QUS metrics. Measures of tendon/cartilage thickness demonstrated the greatest degree of overall dependability (φ = 0.84), followed by echogenicity (φ = 0.56), variance (φ = 0.55), and entropy (φ = 0.47), suggesting that these measures of the supraspinatus tendon may be promising metrics for assessing differences in tendon health. Interrater reliability between ultrasound operators ranged from low to moderate for different QUS metrics, but using more than one image analyst and performing repeated measurement analysis runs on each image help increase reliability of QUS measures for the supraspinatus tendon.

AB - Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is an inexpensive and promising tool for sensitive measurement of tendon pathology. However, few studies have reported the psychometric properties of measurements obtained using this technique for assessments of the supraspinatus tendon. The present study was undertaken to determine the variance contributed by several sources of error (participant, ultrasound operator, image analyst, analysis session) to QUS measures of the supraspinatus tendon. Transverse images of the supraspinatus tendon were captured from eleven subjects (22 shoulders) by two ultrasonographers, and each image was analyzed by two image analysts who each completed two analysis runs. Generalizability theory and intraclass correlations were used to assess the reliability of seven QUS metrics. Measures of tendon/cartilage thickness demonstrated the greatest degree of overall dependability (φ = 0.84), followed by echogenicity (φ = 0.56), variance (φ = 0.55), and entropy (φ = 0.47), suggesting that these measures of the supraspinatus tendon may be promising metrics for assessing differences in tendon health. Interrater reliability between ultrasound operators ranged from low to moderate for different QUS metrics, but using more than one image analyst and performing repeated measurement analysis runs on each image help increase reliability of QUS measures for the supraspinatus tendon.

KW - Quantitative Ultrasound

KW - Reliability

KW - Shoulder

KW - Supraspinatus

KW - Tendon

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038424996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038424996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000820

DO - 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000820

M3 - Article

C2 - 28872465

AN - SCOPUS:85038424996

VL - 97

SP - 62

EP - 67

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 1

ER -