Incomplete documentation of elements of Ottawa Ankle Rules despite an electronic medical record

Luis Salazar, Thomas Best, Brian Hiestand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to observe the frequency of complete documentation of the elements of the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) in acute foot and ankle injuries in an emergency department with an electronic medical record. Procedure: Seven hundred patient visits for acute ankle/foot injuries were reviewed. Each component of the OAR was tabulated as positive, negative, or not documented. Radiograph ordering and results were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Main Findings: Of the 700 charts evaluated, 663 received a radiograph, with 138 fractures identified. The OAR components were completely documented in 288 subjects (41%; 95% confidence interval, 37%-45%). One hundred percent of the charts documented weight-bearing status (template provided), but less than 0.5% (n = 3) documented a navicular examination (not mentioned on the template). Conclusion: Incomplete documentation of examination components is common, even with prompting from an electronic medical record. This engenders both medicolegal risk and an inability to perform quality analyses to minimize unnecessary radiograph use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)999-1002
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume29
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Foot Injuries
Ankle
Documentation
Ankle Injuries
Weight-Bearing
Hospital Emergency Service
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Incomplete documentation of elements of Ottawa Ankle Rules despite an electronic medical record. / Salazar, Luis; Best, Thomas; Hiestand, Brian.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 9, 01.11.2011, p. 999-1002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b99f3cc53e2e4e65a487df93359d078c,
title = "Incomplete documentation of elements of Ottawa Ankle Rules despite an electronic medical record",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of the study was to observe the frequency of complete documentation of the elements of the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) in acute foot and ankle injuries in an emergency department with an electronic medical record. Procedure: Seven hundred patient visits for acute ankle/foot injuries were reviewed. Each component of the OAR was tabulated as positive, negative, or not documented. Radiograph ordering and results were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Main Findings: Of the 700 charts evaluated, 663 received a radiograph, with 138 fractures identified. The OAR components were completely documented in 288 subjects (41{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval, 37{\%}-45{\%}). One hundred percent of the charts documented weight-bearing status (template provided), but less than 0.5{\%} (n = 3) documented a navicular examination (not mentioned on the template). Conclusion: Incomplete documentation of examination components is common, even with prompting from an electronic medical record. This engenders both medicolegal risk and an inability to perform quality analyses to minimize unnecessary radiograph use.",
author = "Luis Salazar and Thomas Best and Brian Hiestand",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2010.05.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "999--1002",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incomplete documentation of elements of Ottawa Ankle Rules despite an electronic medical record

AU - Salazar, Luis

AU - Best, Thomas

AU - Hiestand, Brian

PY - 2011/11/1

Y1 - 2011/11/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of the study was to observe the frequency of complete documentation of the elements of the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) in acute foot and ankle injuries in an emergency department with an electronic medical record. Procedure: Seven hundred patient visits for acute ankle/foot injuries were reviewed. Each component of the OAR was tabulated as positive, negative, or not documented. Radiograph ordering and results were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Main Findings: Of the 700 charts evaluated, 663 received a radiograph, with 138 fractures identified. The OAR components were completely documented in 288 subjects (41%; 95% confidence interval, 37%-45%). One hundred percent of the charts documented weight-bearing status (template provided), but less than 0.5% (n = 3) documented a navicular examination (not mentioned on the template). Conclusion: Incomplete documentation of examination components is common, even with prompting from an electronic medical record. This engenders both medicolegal risk and an inability to perform quality analyses to minimize unnecessary radiograph use.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of the study was to observe the frequency of complete documentation of the elements of the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) in acute foot and ankle injuries in an emergency department with an electronic medical record. Procedure: Seven hundred patient visits for acute ankle/foot injuries were reviewed. Each component of the OAR was tabulated as positive, negative, or not documented. Radiograph ordering and results were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Main Findings: Of the 700 charts evaluated, 663 received a radiograph, with 138 fractures identified. The OAR components were completely documented in 288 subjects (41%; 95% confidence interval, 37%-45%). One hundred percent of the charts documented weight-bearing status (template provided), but less than 0.5% (n = 3) documented a navicular examination (not mentioned on the template). Conclusion: Incomplete documentation of examination components is common, even with prompting from an electronic medical record. This engenders both medicolegal risk and an inability to perform quality analyses to minimize unnecessary radiograph use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80855129663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80855129663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.05.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.05.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 20674227

AN - SCOPUS:80855129663

VL - 29

SP - 999

EP - 1002

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 9

ER -