Incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy: An interdepartmental survey and review of the literature

Endre Z. Neulander, Christopher K. Hawke, Mark S. Soloway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To survey and review the incidence of appendectomy performed during radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. We were interested in the reasons behind the decision and if continent diversions have changed the policy. Methods. We performed a selective survey among urologists in academic centers throughout the United States regarding their practice of incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy. We also reviewed the literature regarding the rationale for incidental appendectomy in general and during radical cystectomy in particular. Results. Among the 13 departments and 26 urologists replying to the survey, 9 (69%) departments and 20 (77%) individual clinicians are not performing routine incidental appendectomy. In 2 departments, it is considered a matter of choice, and, in 4 (31%) departments, appendectomy is performed routinely. Many believe that the low risk of subsequent appendicitis does not justify the procedure and that the appendix may be useful for future reconstruction. A review of the literature suggests that incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy is not necessary. Conclusions. Incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy is not necessary and is no longer being performed in many academic centers. The risk of subsequent appendicitis is extremely low. The decision may depend on the form of urinary diversion planned. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-244
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Appendectomy
Cystectomy
Urinary Diversion
Appendicitis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy : An interdepartmental survey and review of the literature. / Neulander, Endre Z.; Hawke, Christopher K.; Soloway, Mark S.

In: Urology, Vol. 56, No. 2, 01.08.2000, p. 241-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neulander, Endre Z. ; Hawke, Christopher K. ; Soloway, Mark S. / Incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy : An interdepartmental survey and review of the literature. In: Urology. 2000 ; Vol. 56, No. 2. pp. 241-244.
@article{8dd93d0badb044d19b895bbf2e51e422,
title = "Incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy: An interdepartmental survey and review of the literature",
abstract = "Objectives. To survey and review the incidence of appendectomy performed during radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. We were interested in the reasons behind the decision and if continent diversions have changed the policy. Methods. We performed a selective survey among urologists in academic centers throughout the United States regarding their practice of incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy. We also reviewed the literature regarding the rationale for incidental appendectomy in general and during radical cystectomy in particular. Results. Among the 13 departments and 26 urologists replying to the survey, 9 (69{\%}) departments and 20 (77{\%}) individual clinicians are not performing routine incidental appendectomy. In 2 departments, it is considered a matter of choice, and, in 4 (31{\%}) departments, appendectomy is performed routinely. Many believe that the low risk of subsequent appendicitis does not justify the procedure and that the appendix may be useful for future reconstruction. A review of the literature suggests that incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy is not necessary. Conclusions. Incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy is not necessary and is no longer being performed in many academic centers. The risk of subsequent appendicitis is extremely low. The decision may depend on the form of urinary diversion planned. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.",
author = "Neulander, {Endre Z.} and Hawke, {Christopher K.} and Soloway, {Mark S.}",
year = "2000",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00628-2",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "241--244",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy

T2 - An interdepartmental survey and review of the literature

AU - Neulander, Endre Z.

AU - Hawke, Christopher K.

AU - Soloway, Mark S.

PY - 2000/8/1

Y1 - 2000/8/1

N2 - Objectives. To survey and review the incidence of appendectomy performed during radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. We were interested in the reasons behind the decision and if continent diversions have changed the policy. Methods. We performed a selective survey among urologists in academic centers throughout the United States regarding their practice of incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy. We also reviewed the literature regarding the rationale for incidental appendectomy in general and during radical cystectomy in particular. Results. Among the 13 departments and 26 urologists replying to the survey, 9 (69%) departments and 20 (77%) individual clinicians are not performing routine incidental appendectomy. In 2 departments, it is considered a matter of choice, and, in 4 (31%) departments, appendectomy is performed routinely. Many believe that the low risk of subsequent appendicitis does not justify the procedure and that the appendix may be useful for future reconstruction. A review of the literature suggests that incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy is not necessary. Conclusions. Incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy is not necessary and is no longer being performed in many academic centers. The risk of subsequent appendicitis is extremely low. The decision may depend on the form of urinary diversion planned. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

AB - Objectives. To survey and review the incidence of appendectomy performed during radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. We were interested in the reasons behind the decision and if continent diversions have changed the policy. Methods. We performed a selective survey among urologists in academic centers throughout the United States regarding their practice of incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy. We also reviewed the literature regarding the rationale for incidental appendectomy in general and during radical cystectomy in particular. Results. Among the 13 departments and 26 urologists replying to the survey, 9 (69%) departments and 20 (77%) individual clinicians are not performing routine incidental appendectomy. In 2 departments, it is considered a matter of choice, and, in 4 (31%) departments, appendectomy is performed routinely. Many believe that the low risk of subsequent appendicitis does not justify the procedure and that the appendix may be useful for future reconstruction. A review of the literature suggests that incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy is not necessary. Conclusions. Incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy is not necessary and is no longer being performed in many academic centers. The risk of subsequent appendicitis is extremely low. The decision may depend on the form of urinary diversion planned. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033931687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033931687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00628-2

DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00628-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 10925086

AN - SCOPUS:0033931687

VL - 56

SP - 241

EP - 244

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 2

ER -