Incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy: An interdepartmental survey and review of the literature

Endre Z. Neulander, Christopher K. Hawke, Mark S. Soloway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives. To survey and review the incidence of appendectomy performed during radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. We were interested in the reasons behind the decision and if continent diversions have changed the policy. Methods. We performed a selective survey among urologists in academic centers throughout the United States regarding their practice of incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy. We also reviewed the literature regarding the rationale for incidental appendectomy in general and during radical cystectomy in particular. Results. Among the 13 departments and 26 urologists replying to the survey, 9 (69%) departments and 20 (77%) individual clinicians are not performing routine incidental appendectomy. In 2 departments, it is considered a matter of choice, and, in 4 (31%) departments, appendectomy is performed routinely. Many believe that the low risk of subsequent appendicitis does not justify the procedure and that the appendix may be useful for future reconstruction. A review of the literature suggests that incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy is not necessary. Conclusions. Incidental appendectomy during radical cystectomy is not necessary and is no longer being performed in many academic centers. The risk of subsequent appendicitis is extremely low. The decision may depend on the form of urinary diversion planned. Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-244
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2000

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this