In vitro performance characteristics of reused ablation catheters

Igor Ayzman, Samer R. Dibs, Jeffrey Goldberger, Rod Passman, Alan Kadish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Prior studies have found that there is a widespread practice of catheter reprocessing in cardiac electrophysiology laboratories. Effects of reprocessing of ablation catheters on temperature sensing and mechanical deflection are not fully known. Methods: Twenty-four new and used ablation catheters were studied. Deviation of temperature sensing by catheters from the temperature of a heated saline bath was measured. The angle of deflection of digitally scanned catheters at 75% and 100% handle deflection was also measured. New and used catheters were compared with respect to their temperature sensing accuracy and deflection characteristics. Results: Overall, there was 0.7±0.1°C (mean± standard error) deviation of the sensed temperature from the bath temperature, with no significant difference between new and used catheters. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the angle of deflection between new (66.7° ± 6.2° and 24.3° ± 6.8° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively) and used (59.6° ± 5.6° and 28.7° ± 9.9° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively) catheters. The difference in the angle of deflection between matched new and used catheters was 18.9° ± 4.2° and 10.9° ± 2.4° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively, with a relatively broad range (5.0°-35.6° and 0.4°-19.0° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively). Conclusions: This study found no significant overall difference in temperature sensing accuracy and deflection angle of new and used ablation catheters. Nevertheless, individual differences in deflection characteristics between new and used catheters are occasionally seen and warrant screening of reprocessed catheters prior to their reuse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-59
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Catheter Ablation
Catheters
Temperature
Baths
Cardiac Electrophysiology
In Vitro Techniques
Individuality

Keywords

  • Catheter ablation
  • Equipment reuse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

In vitro performance characteristics of reused ablation catheters. / Ayzman, Igor; Dibs, Samer R.; Goldberger, Jeffrey; Passman, Rod; Kadish, Alan.

In: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.08.2002, p. 53-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ayzman, Igor ; Dibs, Samer R. ; Goldberger, Jeffrey ; Passman, Rod ; Kadish, Alan. / In vitro performance characteristics of reused ablation catheters. In: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. 2002 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 53-59.
@article{3532c8668e494d58885589587c7338a2,
title = "In vitro performance characteristics of reused ablation catheters",
abstract = "Background: Prior studies have found that there is a widespread practice of catheter reprocessing in cardiac electrophysiology laboratories. Effects of reprocessing of ablation catheters on temperature sensing and mechanical deflection are not fully known. Methods: Twenty-four new and used ablation catheters were studied. Deviation of temperature sensing by catheters from the temperature of a heated saline bath was measured. The angle of deflection of digitally scanned catheters at 75{\%} and 100{\%} handle deflection was also measured. New and used catheters were compared with respect to their temperature sensing accuracy and deflection characteristics. Results: Overall, there was 0.7±0.1°C (mean± standard error) deviation of the sensed temperature from the bath temperature, with no significant difference between new and used catheters. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the angle of deflection between new (66.7° ± 6.2° and 24.3° ± 6.8° at 75{\%} and 100{\%} deflections, respectively) and used (59.6° ± 5.6° and 28.7° ± 9.9° at 75{\%} and 100{\%} deflections, respectively) catheters. The difference in the angle of deflection between matched new and used catheters was 18.9° ± 4.2° and 10.9° ± 2.4° at 75{\%} and 100{\%} deflections, respectively, with a relatively broad range (5.0°-35.6° and 0.4°-19.0° at 75{\%} and 100{\%} deflections, respectively). Conclusions: This study found no significant overall difference in temperature sensing accuracy and deflection angle of new and used ablation catheters. Nevertheless, individual differences in deflection characteristics between new and used catheters are occasionally seen and warrant screening of reprocessed catheters prior to their reuse.",
keywords = "Catheter ablation, Equipment reuse",
author = "Igor Ayzman and Dibs, {Samer R.} and Jeffrey Goldberger and Rod Passman and Alan Kadish",
year = "2002",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1020820200112",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "53--59",
journal = "Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology",
issn = "1383-875X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In vitro performance characteristics of reused ablation catheters

AU - Ayzman, Igor

AU - Dibs, Samer R.

AU - Goldberger, Jeffrey

AU - Passman, Rod

AU - Kadish, Alan

PY - 2002/8/1

Y1 - 2002/8/1

N2 - Background: Prior studies have found that there is a widespread practice of catheter reprocessing in cardiac electrophysiology laboratories. Effects of reprocessing of ablation catheters on temperature sensing and mechanical deflection are not fully known. Methods: Twenty-four new and used ablation catheters were studied. Deviation of temperature sensing by catheters from the temperature of a heated saline bath was measured. The angle of deflection of digitally scanned catheters at 75% and 100% handle deflection was also measured. New and used catheters were compared with respect to their temperature sensing accuracy and deflection characteristics. Results: Overall, there was 0.7±0.1°C (mean± standard error) deviation of the sensed temperature from the bath temperature, with no significant difference between new and used catheters. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the angle of deflection between new (66.7° ± 6.2° and 24.3° ± 6.8° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively) and used (59.6° ± 5.6° and 28.7° ± 9.9° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively) catheters. The difference in the angle of deflection between matched new and used catheters was 18.9° ± 4.2° and 10.9° ± 2.4° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively, with a relatively broad range (5.0°-35.6° and 0.4°-19.0° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively). Conclusions: This study found no significant overall difference in temperature sensing accuracy and deflection angle of new and used ablation catheters. Nevertheless, individual differences in deflection characteristics between new and used catheters are occasionally seen and warrant screening of reprocessed catheters prior to their reuse.

AB - Background: Prior studies have found that there is a widespread practice of catheter reprocessing in cardiac electrophysiology laboratories. Effects of reprocessing of ablation catheters on temperature sensing and mechanical deflection are not fully known. Methods: Twenty-four new and used ablation catheters were studied. Deviation of temperature sensing by catheters from the temperature of a heated saline bath was measured. The angle of deflection of digitally scanned catheters at 75% and 100% handle deflection was also measured. New and used catheters were compared with respect to their temperature sensing accuracy and deflection characteristics. Results: Overall, there was 0.7±0.1°C (mean± standard error) deviation of the sensed temperature from the bath temperature, with no significant difference between new and used catheters. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the angle of deflection between new (66.7° ± 6.2° and 24.3° ± 6.8° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively) and used (59.6° ± 5.6° and 28.7° ± 9.9° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively) catheters. The difference in the angle of deflection between matched new and used catheters was 18.9° ± 4.2° and 10.9° ± 2.4° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively, with a relatively broad range (5.0°-35.6° and 0.4°-19.0° at 75% and 100% deflections, respectively). Conclusions: This study found no significant overall difference in temperature sensing accuracy and deflection angle of new and used ablation catheters. Nevertheless, individual differences in deflection characteristics between new and used catheters are occasionally seen and warrant screening of reprocessed catheters prior to their reuse.

KW - Catheter ablation

KW - Equipment reuse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036704429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036704429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1020820200112

DO - 10.1023/A:1020820200112

M3 - Article

C2 - 12391420

AN - SCOPUS:0036704429

VL - 7

SP - 53

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

SN - 1383-875X

IS - 1

ER -