In-stream bacteria modeling as a function of the hydrologic state of a watershed

Jeffrey J. Iudicello, David A. Chin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a new way of modeling in-stream bacteria concentrations by examining a watershed in terms of wet and dry hydrologic states. Flow-duration curves were developed for four catchments of the Little River Experimental Watershed in Tifton, Georgia, and HSPF and SWAT bacteria models were built for the catchments. The flow-duration curves were used to designate wet and dry states of the catchments based on flow conditions instead of calendar day, the bacteria data sets were divided into wet and dry groups accordingly, and the models were calibrated to the wet and dry states. Water-quality parameter sensitivities revealed that each model placed varying emphasis on the parameters in each state according to the model's structure, and certain parameters were insensitive in both wet and dry states. A custom parameter added to the models to represent background in-stream and/or distributed loads was consistently sensitive across hydrologic states and improved model predictions in both computer models. Seven of the eight scenarios considered attained better model predictions in the wet state than the dry state as evaluated by a log-transformed Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency. The results show that fundamental aspects of the models' performance are revealed in light of the analysis by hydrologic state and can provide future guidance for the collection of better datasets for use in bacteria modeling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number04014073
JournalJournal of Environmental Engineering (United States)
Volume141
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Watersheds
Bacteria
watershed
bacterium
modeling
Catchments
catchment
Model structures
prediction
Water quality
Rivers
water quality
parameter
river

Keywords

  • Fecal coliform
  • Flow duration curve
  • Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF)
  • Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT)
  • Water quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

In-stream bacteria modeling as a function of the hydrologic state of a watershed. / Iudicello, Jeffrey J.; Chin, David A.

In: Journal of Environmental Engineering (United States), Vol. 141, No. 4, 04014073, 01.04.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4fbc1a98a78643538e01781ee4c59122,
title = "In-stream bacteria modeling as a function of the hydrologic state of a watershed",
abstract = "This paper presents a new way of modeling in-stream bacteria concentrations by examining a watershed in terms of wet and dry hydrologic states. Flow-duration curves were developed for four catchments of the Little River Experimental Watershed in Tifton, Georgia, and HSPF and SWAT bacteria models were built for the catchments. The flow-duration curves were used to designate wet and dry states of the catchments based on flow conditions instead of calendar day, the bacteria data sets were divided into wet and dry groups accordingly, and the models were calibrated to the wet and dry states. Water-quality parameter sensitivities revealed that each model placed varying emphasis on the parameters in each state according to the model's structure, and certain parameters were insensitive in both wet and dry states. A custom parameter added to the models to represent background in-stream and/or distributed loads was consistently sensitive across hydrologic states and improved model predictions in both computer models. Seven of the eight scenarios considered attained better model predictions in the wet state than the dry state as evaluated by a log-transformed Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency. The results show that fundamental aspects of the models' performance are revealed in light of the analysis by hydrologic state and can provide future guidance for the collection of better datasets for use in bacteria modeling.",
keywords = "Fecal coliform, Flow duration curve, Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF), Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT), Water quality",
author = "Iudicello, {Jeffrey J.} and Chin, {David A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000879",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "141",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE",
issn = "0733-9372",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In-stream bacteria modeling as a function of the hydrologic state of a watershed

AU - Iudicello, Jeffrey J.

AU - Chin, David A.

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - This paper presents a new way of modeling in-stream bacteria concentrations by examining a watershed in terms of wet and dry hydrologic states. Flow-duration curves were developed for four catchments of the Little River Experimental Watershed in Tifton, Georgia, and HSPF and SWAT bacteria models were built for the catchments. The flow-duration curves were used to designate wet and dry states of the catchments based on flow conditions instead of calendar day, the bacteria data sets were divided into wet and dry groups accordingly, and the models were calibrated to the wet and dry states. Water-quality parameter sensitivities revealed that each model placed varying emphasis on the parameters in each state according to the model's structure, and certain parameters were insensitive in both wet and dry states. A custom parameter added to the models to represent background in-stream and/or distributed loads was consistently sensitive across hydrologic states and improved model predictions in both computer models. Seven of the eight scenarios considered attained better model predictions in the wet state than the dry state as evaluated by a log-transformed Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency. The results show that fundamental aspects of the models' performance are revealed in light of the analysis by hydrologic state and can provide future guidance for the collection of better datasets for use in bacteria modeling.

AB - This paper presents a new way of modeling in-stream bacteria concentrations by examining a watershed in terms of wet and dry hydrologic states. Flow-duration curves were developed for four catchments of the Little River Experimental Watershed in Tifton, Georgia, and HSPF and SWAT bacteria models were built for the catchments. The flow-duration curves were used to designate wet and dry states of the catchments based on flow conditions instead of calendar day, the bacteria data sets were divided into wet and dry groups accordingly, and the models were calibrated to the wet and dry states. Water-quality parameter sensitivities revealed that each model placed varying emphasis on the parameters in each state according to the model's structure, and certain parameters were insensitive in both wet and dry states. A custom parameter added to the models to represent background in-stream and/or distributed loads was consistently sensitive across hydrologic states and improved model predictions in both computer models. Seven of the eight scenarios considered attained better model predictions in the wet state than the dry state as evaluated by a log-transformed Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency. The results show that fundamental aspects of the models' performance are revealed in light of the analysis by hydrologic state and can provide future guidance for the collection of better datasets for use in bacteria modeling.

KW - Fecal coliform

KW - Flow duration curve

KW - Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF)

KW - Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT)

KW - Water quality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924959157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924959157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000879

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000879

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84924959157

VL - 141

JO - Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE

JF - Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE

SN - 0733-9372

IS - 4

M1 - 04014073

ER -